January 2024 - fonts-bugs - Fedora Mailing-Lists

[Bug 2088665] New: Noto Sans is chosen to display symbol characters it doesn't contain

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2088665 Bug ID: 2088665 Summary: Noto Sans is chosen to display symbol characters it doesn't contain Product: Fedora Version: 36 Status: NEW Component: google-noto-fonts Assignee: tagoh(a)redhat.com Reporter: talk(a)danielflaum.net QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, petersen(a)redhat.com, psatpute(a)redhat.com, pwu(a)redhat.com, tagoh(a)redhat.com Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Created attachment 1881507 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1881507&action=edit A zipped sample PDF and image of relevant portion of PDF when affected by the issue Description of problem: Given a PDF lacking embedded fonts which use certain characters (including → and ≥), GNOME's Evince on Fedora 36 chooses to substitute the Noto Sans font, which does not include these characters. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): How reproducible: Successfully reproduced by two people independently. Steps to Reproduce: 1. Boot a fresh copy of Fedora 36 (the Live version in a VM will do). 2. Open the attached sample PDF in GNOME Evince (aka Document Viewer). 3. Observe the missing characters in the second paragraph from the top of the page. Actual results: See attached image. Expected results: The missing characters should be displayed properly as → (that is, https://unicode-table.com/en/2192/). Additional info: The filer initially sought help at https://ask.fedoraproject.org/t/missing-characters-in-pdfs-since-upgrade-..., which may be informative in reproducing the issue. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2088665

1 month, 1 week

1
26
0 / 0

[Bug 2093080] New: Default fonts for Arabic do not match the font packages list

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2093080 Bug ID: 2093080 Summary: Default fonts for Arabic do not match the font packages list Product: Fedora Version: 36 Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: fontconfig Severity: medium Assignee: tagoh(a)redhat.com Reporter: awilliam(a)redhat.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: ajax(a)redhat.com, caillon+fedoraproject(a)gmail.com, fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, gnome-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, mclasen(a)redhat.com, pnemade(a)redhat.com, rhughes(a)redhat.com, rstrode(a)redhat.com, sandmann(a)redhat.com, tagoh(a)redhat.com Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora There's a test case: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_i18n_default_fonts which requires checking the default fonts for various languages against a list, http://tagoh.fedorapeople.org/fonts/fc-test.sh . The current default fonts for Arabic installs do not match the list. The list states sans should be DejaVu Sans, serif should be FreeSerif or MPH 2B Damase, and mono should be DejaVu Sans Mono. These may have been changed recently, as our openQA reference text file expects them to be Noto Naskh Arabic (for both sans and serif?) and PakType Naskh Basic for mono. In any case, what we actually see doesn't match either the list or the openQA reference file. We see "Noto Sans Arabic" and "PakType Naqsh" in the output from the test, I think for serif (yes really) and monospace respectively. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2093080

1 month, 1 week

1
20
0 / 0

[Bug 1761885] New: rpm -V complains about mode for ghost .uuid files

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1761885 Bug ID: 1761885 Summary: rpm -V complains about mode for ghost .uuid files Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: fontpackages Assignee: nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net Reporter: mtasaka(a)fedoraproject.org QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net, paul(a)frixxon.co.uk, redhat-bugzilla(a)linuxnetz.de, tagoh(a)redhat.com Target Milestone: --- Link ID: Red Hat Bugzilla 1564432 Classification: Fedora Description of problem: rpm -Va complains a lot about mode of %ghost .uuid files: .M....... g /usr/share/fonts/paktype-naqsh/.uuid .M....... g /usr/share/fonts/lilypond/.uuid .M....... g /usr/share/fonts/sil-padauk/.uuid .M....... g /usr/share/fonts/google-droid/.uuid .M....... g /usr/share/fonts/lilypond/.uuid .M....... g /usr/share/fonts/smc-suruma/.uuid .M....... g /usr/share/fonts/google-android-emoji/.uuid .M....... g /usr/share/fonts/google-crosextra-carlito/.uuid .M....... g /usr/share/fonts/lohit-assamese/.uuid .M....... g /usr/share/fonts/dejavu/.uuid .M....... g /usr/share/fonts/lohit-telugu/.uuid .M....... g /usr/share/fonts/lilypond/.uuid ..... Looks like fontpackages-devel template rpmmacro creates .uuid which %ghost %atttr(0000) e.g. [root@localhost ~]# rpm -qf /usr/share/fonts/google-droid/.uuid google-droid-sans-fonts-20120715-16.fc31.noarch [root@localhost ~]# rpm -qlv google-droid-sans-fonts | grep uuid ---------- 1 root root 0 7月 25 23:03 /usr/share/fonts/google-droid/.uuid ref: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/fontpackages/blob/master/f/fontpackage... but I guess %transfiletriggerin script by fontconfig creates .uuid as 0755 permission (perhaps) Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): fontpackages-filesystem-1.44-25.fc31.noarch fontconfig-2.13.92-3.fc31.x86_64 fontconfig-2.13.92-3.fc31.i686 google-droid-sans-fonts-20120715-16.fc31.noarch How reproducible: 100% Steps to Reproduce: 1. See above, try $ rpm -Va 2. 3. Actual results: See above, lots of .uuid permission complaint Expected results: No complaint by rpm -Va Additional info: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

2 months

1
20
0 / 0

[Bug 2112732] New: Fail to build from source

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2112732 Bug ID: 2112732 Summary: Fail to build from source Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: campivisivi-titillium-fonts Assignee: luya_tfz(a)thefinalzone.net Reporter: tagoh(a)redhat.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, luya_tfz(a)thefinalzone.net Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Description of problem: Titillium_roman_upright_italic_2_0_OT.zip contains two directory. one is Titillium_roman_upright_italic_2_0_OT which is specified as a base directory in the spec file. another one is __MACOSX. the spec file doesn't clean up __MACOSX, thus, the build stop on extracting like: + /usr/lib/rpm/rpmuncompress -x /var/home/tagoh/rpmbuild/SOURCES/Titillium_roman_upright_italic_2_0_OT.zip replace __MACOSX/Titillium_roman_upright_italic_2_0_OT/._Titillium-Black.otf? [y]es, [n]o, [A]ll, [N]one, [r]ename: Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): campivisivi-titillium-fonts-20120913-25.fc37 How reproducible: always Steps to Reproduce: 1.download SRPM 2.rpmbuild --rebuild campivisivi-titillium-fonts-20120913-25.fc37.src.rpm 3.try again once the rebuild finished. Actual results: the rebuild always fails except first try. Expected results: the rebuild should be successfully finished any time. Additional info: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2112732

2 months, 1 week

1
4
0 / 0

[Bug 2259962] New: noto symbol font incorrect for PDF / Postscript

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2259962 Bug ID: 2259962 Summary: noto symbol font incorrect for PDF / Postscript Product: Fedora Version: 39 URL: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1SrcMEFqI26un4MAxh2OHd oTbOi9hgM4v OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: google-noto-fonts Keywords: Desktop Severity: medium Assignee: tagoh(a)redhat.com Reporter: vk2bea(a)gmail.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, petersen(a)redhat.com, pwu(a)redhat.com, tagoh(a)redhat.com Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora google-noto-fonts package installs configuration files - /etc/fonts/conf.d/58-google-noto-sans-symbols2.conf and /etc/fonts/conf.d/58-google-noto-sans-symbols-vf.conf which cause Postscript platform font /Symbol to use NotoSansSymbols[wght].ttf # fc-match Symbol NotoSansSymbols[wght].ttf: "Noto Sans Symbols" "Regular" This font does not have the glyphs required for the standard platform font "Symbol" https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Symbol_(typeface) This should not hijack /Symbol name ... the correct file could be StandardSymbolsPS.t1. This results in PDF files that use the Symbol font to produce no or wrong characters for the glyphs (example /Omega or /degree (see PDF file https://drive.google.com/file/d/1SrcMEFqI26un4MAxh2OHdoTbOi9hgM4v). This file renders correctly using browsers (Chrome Firefox or Ghostscript) because they include Postscript core fonts but evince, okular, atril rely on Fedora to provide fonts. These applications do not render the symbol glyphs Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: view PDF with symbol glyphs from Postscript standard symbol font Actual Results: no symbol glyphs shown for PDF viewers using Fedora fonts (rather than built in Postscript core fonts) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2259962 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-...

2 months, 3 weeks

1
8
0 / 0

[Bug 2261113] New: freetype: FTBFS in Fedora rawhide/f40

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2261113 Bug ID: 2261113 Summary: freetype: FTBFS in Fedora rawhide/f40 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: freetype Assignee: mkasik(a)redhat.com Reporter: releng(a)fedoraproject.org QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: ajax(a)redhat.com, fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, gnome-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, mclasen(a)redhat.com, mkasik(a)redhat.com, rstrode(a)redhat.com Blocks: 2231791 (F40FTBFS) Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora freetype failed to build from source in Fedora rawhide/f40 https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=112260144 For details on the mass rebuild see: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_40_Mass_Rebuild Please fix freetype at your earliest convenience and set the bug's status to ASSIGNED when you start fixing it. If the bug remains in NEW state for 8 weeks, freetype will be orphaned. Before branching of Fedora 41, freetype will be retired, if it still fails to build. For more details on the FTBFS policy, please visit: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Fails_to_build_from_source_Fai... Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2231791 [Bug 2231791] Fedora 40 FTBFS Tracker -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2261113 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-...

2 months, 3 weeks

1
4
0 / 0

[Bug 2260975] New: alfont: FTBFS in Fedora rawhide/f40

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2260975 Bug ID: 2260975 Summary: alfont: FTBFS in Fedora rawhide/f40 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: alfont Assignee: hdegoede(a)redhat.com Reporter: releng(a)fedoraproject.org QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, hdegoede(a)redhat.com Blocks: 2231791 (F40FTBFS) Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora alfont failed to build from source in Fedora rawhide/f40 https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=112192424 For details on the mass rebuild see: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_40_Mass_Rebuild Please fix alfont at your earliest convenience and set the bug's status to ASSIGNED when you start fixing it. If the bug remains in NEW state for 8 weeks, alfont will be orphaned. Before branching of Fedora 41, alfont will be retired, if it still fails to build. For more details on the FTBFS policy, please visit: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Fails_to_build_from_source_Fai... Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2231791 [Bug 2231791] Fedora 40 FTBFS Tracker -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2260975 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-...

2 months, 4 weeks

1
3
0 / 0

[Bug 2257809] New: CVE-2023-45139 fonttools: XML External Entity Injection (XXE) Vulnerability [fedora-all]

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2257809 Bug ID: 2257809 Summary: CVE-2023-45139 fonttools: XML External Entity Injection (XXE) Vulnerability [fedora-all] Product: Fedora Version: 39 Status: NEW Component: fonttools Keywords: Security, SecurityTracking Severity: high Priority: high Assignee: pnemade(a)redhat.com Reporter: trathi(a)redhat.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, pnemade(a)redhat.com, tagoh(a)redhat.com Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora More information about this security flaw is available in the following bug: http://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2257808 Disclaimer: Community trackers are created by Red Hat Product Security team on a best effort basis. Package maintainers are required to ascertain if the flaw indeed affects their package, before starting the update process. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2257809 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-...

3 months

1
6
0 / 0

[Bug 2077991] CVE-2022-27405 FreeType: Segmentation violation via FNT_Size_Request

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2077991 errata-xmlrpc <errata-xmlrpc(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Link ID| |Red Hat Product Errata | |RHSA-2024:0420 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2077991

3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 2077985] CVE-2022-27406 Freetype: Segmentation violation via FT_Request_Size

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2077985 errata-xmlrpc <errata-xmlrpc(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Link ID| |Red Hat Product Errata | |RHSA-2024:0420 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2077985

3 months

1
0
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

fonts-bugs January 2024