January 2024 - fonts-bugs - Fedora mailing-lists

[Bug 1999078] New: Hinting broken for Bitstream Vera/DejaVu in Epiphany
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 27 Nov '24

27 Nov '24

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1999078 Bug ID: 1999078 Summary: Hinting broken for Bitstream Vera/DejaVu in Epiphany Product: Fedora Version: 34 Status: NEW Component: freetype Assignee: mkasik(a)redhat.com Reporter: ossman(a)cendio.se QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: ajax(a)redhat.com, caillon+fedoraproject(a)gmail.com, fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, gnome-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, kevin(a)tigcc.ticalc.org, mark(a)net-c.com, mclasen(a)redhat.com, mkasik(a)redhat.com, rhughes(a)redhat.com, rstrode(a)redhat.com, sandmann(a)redhat.com Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Created attachment 1819062 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1819062&action=edit Screenshot with varying sub pixel placement Description of problem: After upgrading from Fedora 33 to Fedora 34, there is some extremely odd hinting bug in Epiphany. The same glyph appears with different amount of hinting in the same line of text, causing a very odd and blurry appearance. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): freetype-2.10.4-3.fc34.x86_64 bitstream-vera-sans-fonts-1.10-41.fc33.noarch dejavu-sans-fonts-2.37-16.fc34.noarch epiphany-40.3-1.fc34.x86_64 webkit2gtk3-2.32.3-1.fc34.x86_64 pango-1.48.9-2.fc34.x86_64 How reproducible: 100% Steps to Reproduce: 1. Configure Epiphany to use Bitstream Vera or DejaVu Sans Book 2. Configure full hinting Actual results: Fully hinted, consistent glyphs. Expected results: Some glyphs are fully hinted, some look like they've been offset by a fraction of a pixel. (See screenshot) Additional info: So far I'm only seeing this in Epiphany. I still filed this for freetype since as far as I know it is freetype that does all glyph layout, hinting and sub-pixel stuff. Feel free to move as appropriate. So it seems odd that a bug in Epiphany can screw this up. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 43

[Bug 1833858] New: Hangul Jamo is seperated and printed respectively
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 27 Nov '24

27 Nov '24

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1833858 Bug ID: 1833858 Summary: Hangul Jamo is seperated and printed respectively Product: Fedora Version: 32 Status: NEW Component: google-droid-fonts Assignee: nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net Reporter: hyunwoo.park(a)gmail.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net, oliver(a)redhat.com, paul(a)frixxon.co.uk, tremble(a)tremble.org.uk Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Created attachment 1687129 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1687129&action=edit wrong display of Hangul at LibreOffice Writer Description of problem: When Hangul is output to the monitor, Chosung, Neutral, and Jongseong are output separately. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): Font file, /usr/share/fonts/google-droid-sans-fonts/DroidSansFallbackFull.ttf, of google-droid-sans-fonts-20200215-3.fc32.noarch How reproducible: If you create a test.html containing "가속도" and open the file in the chrome browser, the Korean alphabet will be displayed separately. Or, write "가속도" at LibreOffice Writer and select font as "Droid Sans Fallback". Steps to Reproduce: 1. write "가속도" at LibreOffece Writer 2. select the text and change font name to "Droid Sans Fallback" Actual results: The text is displayed like "가ㅅㅗㄱㄷㅗ". Expected results: Text should be "가속도" Additional info: https://kldp.org/node/163247 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 43

[Bug 2213602] New: update to version 7.0
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 30 Sep '24

30 Sep '24

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2213602 Bug ID: 2213602 Summary: update to version 7.0 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: paktype-naskh-basic-fonts Severity: medium Assignee: extras-orphan(a)fedoraproject.org Reporter: petersen(a)redhat.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: extras-orphan(a)fedoraproject.org, fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, psatpute(a)redhat.com, vishalvijayraghavan(a)gmail.com Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Currently we have version 6.0 in Fedora. In April 7.0 was released. Reproducible: Always -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2213602 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…

1 5

[Bug 1999864] New: Cannot find package with font for Coptic although such a package exists for Fedora 34
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 19 Sep '24

19 Sep '24

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1999864 Bug ID: 1999864 Summary: Cannot find package with font for Coptic although such a package exists for Fedora 34 Product: Fedora Version: 34 Status: NEW Component: fontconfig Assignee: tagoh(a)redhat.com Reporter: mfabian(a)redhat.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: ajax(a)redhat.com, caillon+fedoraproject(a)gmail.com, fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, gnome-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, mclasen(a)redhat.com, pnemade(a)redhat.com, rhughes(a)redhat.com, rstrode(a)redhat.com, sandmann(a)redhat.com, tagoh(a)redhat.com Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Created attachment 1819530 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1819530&action=edit Gnome Software unable to find Coptic fonts Using Fedora-Workstation-Live-x86_64-34-1.2.iso in qemu. I played with emoji picker and Gnome popped up something requesting more fonts. I clicked and then Gnome Software said: “Unable to find the Coptic, Persian, Old (ca. 600-400 B.C.), Ugaritic you were searching for. Please see _the documentation_ for more information.” See attached screenshot. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 15

[Bug 2251384] New: Wrong Arabic font prioritization in several apps. (Droid kufi prioritized over noto-sans)
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 05 Sep '24

05 Sep '24

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2251384 Bug ID: 2251384 Summary: Wrong Arabic font prioritization in several apps. (Droid kufi prioritized over noto-sans) Product: Fedora Version: 39 OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: fontconfig Severity: low Assignee: tagoh(a)redhat.com Reporter: alawamiaz(a)gmail.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: ajax(a)redhat.com, fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, gnome-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, mclasen(a)redhat.com, rstrode(a)redhat.com, tagoh(a)redhat.com Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Description of problem: Few fedora releases ago, Noto-Sans-Arabic was set to be the default. It was working fine and Arabic text was displayed in all web browsers using this font. sometime in last few months, every web browser in fedora suddenly started prioritizing "Druid Kufi" font over noto-sans-arabic. which now looks makes arabic text looks jarring. Interestingly, when running from live usb image, noto-sans-arabic is correctly priotirized and being used to render all arabic web pages, but only for FEW MINUTES and then suddenly it's switched to druid kufi!, without updating anything, just running Firefox for few minutes. It's also reproducible after fresh install, the first 3 minutes of using the new fedora installation, Firefox and other browsers are displaying noto-sans then suddenly switch to druid kufi. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 38-39 How reproducible: Consistently Steps to Reproduce: 1.Connect to internet 2.Open arabic webpage in firefox (ex, wikipedia) 3.text would be displayed with druid kufi instead of the default noto-sans-arabic which was chosen to be the default sometime around fedora 36. Actual results: Arabic Text displayed with druid kufi font Expected results: Arabic text should be displayed using noto-sans-arabic as was the case before. Additional info: The font in gnome and top bars is still correctly displayed using noto-sans-arabic. It's browsers that exhibit the problem. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2251384 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…

1 12

[Bug 2247028] New: fonttools fails to build with Python 3.13: error: implicit declaration of function ‘_PyLong_Copy’
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 01 Jul '24

01 Jul '24

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2247028 Bug ID: 2247028 Summary: fonttools fails to build with Python 3.13: error: implicit declaration of function ‘_PyLong_Copy’ Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: fonttools Assignee: pnemade(a)redhat.com Reporter: ksurma(a)redhat.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, ksurma(a)redhat.com, mhroncok(a)redhat.com, pnemade(a)redhat.com, tagoh(a)redhat.com Blocks: 2244836 (PYTHON3.13) Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora fonttools fails to build with Python 3.13.0a1. This report is automated and not very verbose, but we'll try to get back here with details. Lib/fontTools/qu2cu/qu2cu.c: In function ‘__Pyx_PyLong_AbsNeg’: Lib/fontTools/qu2cu/qu2cu.c:10421:26: error: implicit declaration of function ‘_PyLong_Copy’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] 10421 | PyObject *copy = _PyLong_Copy((PyLongObject*)n); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~ https://docs.python.org/3.13/whatsnew/3.13.html For the build logs, see: https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/@python/python3.13/fedora-r… For all our attempts to build fonttools with Python 3.13, see: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/g/python/python3.13/package/fonttoo… Testing and mass rebuild of packages is happening in copr. You can follow these instructions to test locally in mock if your package builds with Python 3.13: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/g/python/python3.13/ Let us know here if you have any questions. Python 3.13 is planned to be included in Fedora 41. To make that update smoother, we're building Fedora packages with all pre-releases of Python 3.13. A build failure prevents us from testing all dependent packages (transitive [Build]Requires), so if this package is required a lot, it's important for us to get it fixed soon. We'd appreciate help from the people who know this package best, but if you don't want to work on this now, let us know so we can try to work around it on our side. Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2244836 [Bug 2244836] Python 3.13 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2247028 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…

1 1

[Bug 2260975] New: alfont: FTBFS in Fedora rawhide/f40
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 15 Jun '24

15 Jun '24

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2260975 Bug ID: 2260975 Summary: alfont: FTBFS in Fedora rawhide/f40 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: alfont Assignee: hdegoede(a)redhat.com Reporter: releng(a)fedoraproject.org QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, hdegoede(a)redhat.com Blocks: 2231791 (F40FTBFS) Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora alfont failed to build from source in Fedora rawhide/f40 https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=112192424 For details on the mass rebuild see: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_40_Mass_Rebuild Please fix alfont at your earliest convenience and set the bug's status to ASSIGNED when you start fixing it. If the bug remains in NEW state for 8 weeks, alfont will be orphaned. Before branching of Fedora 41, alfont will be retired, if it still fails to build. For more details on the FTBFS policy, please visit: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Fails_to_build_from_source_Fails… Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2231791 [Bug 2231791] Fedora 40 FTBFS Tracker -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2260975 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…

1 5

[Bug 2245798] New: fontforge fails to build with Python 3.13: error: implicit declaration of function `Py_SetProgramName`
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 15 Jun '24

15 Jun '24

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2245798 Bug ID: 2245798 Summary: fontforge fails to build with Python 3.13: error: implicit declaration of function `Py_SetProgramName` Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: fontforge Assignee: kevin(a)scrye.com Reporter: ksurma(a)redhat.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, kevin(a)scrye.com, ksurma(a)redhat.com, mhroncok(a)redhat.com, pnemade(a)redhat.com Blocks: 2231791 (F40FTBFS,RAWHIDEFTBFS), 2244836 (PYTHON3.13) Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora fontforge fails to build with Python 3.13.0a1. /builddir/build/BUILD/fontforge-20230101/fontforge/python.c:19636:5: error: implicit declaration of function ‘Py_SetProgramName’; did you mean ‘Py_GetProgramName’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] 19636 | Py_SetProgramName(saved_progname); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ | Py_GetProgramName Py_SetProgramName has been removed from Python 3.13. According to https://docs.python.org/3.13/whatsnew/3.13.html: Py_SetProgramName(): set PyConfig.program_name instead. https://docs.python.org/3.13/whatsnew/3.13.html For the build logs, see: https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/@python/python3.13/fedora-r… For all our attempts to build fontforge with Python 3.13, see: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/g/python/python3.13/package/fontfor… Testing and mass rebuild of packages is happening in copr. You can follow these instructions to test locally in mock if your package builds with Python 3.13: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/g/python/python3.13/ Let us know here if you have any questions. Python 3.13 is planned to be included in Fedora 41. To make that update smoother, we're building Fedora packages with all pre-releases of Python 3.13. A build failure prevents us from testing all dependent packages (transitive [Build]Requires), so if this package is required a lot, it's important for us to get it fixed soon. We'd appreciate help from the people who know this package best, but if you don't want to work on this now, let us know so we can try to work around it on our side. Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2231791 [Bug 2231791] Fedora 40 FTBFS Tracker https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2244836 [Bug 2244836] Python 3.13 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2245798 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…

1 2

[Bug 2258723] New: Variable fonts packages dont include all axis
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 19 May '24

19 May '24

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2258723 Bug ID: 2258723 Summary: Variable fonts packages dont include all axis Product: Fedora Version: 39 OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: google-noto-fonts Keywords: RFE Severity: low Assignee: tagoh(a)redhat.com Reporter: sharpenedblade(a)proton.me QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, petersen(a)redhat.com, pwu(a)redhat.com, tagoh(a)redhat.com Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora The *-vf packages package files from the `slim-variable-ttf` dir, which do not include every axis available for the font. Variable font files with all supported axis are in `variable-ttf` dir instead. Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. Install `google-noto-sans-vf` 2. Check which axis are supported 3. Download `https://github.com/notofonts/notofonts.github.io/archive/refs/tags/noto-monthly-release-23.8.1.tar.gz` and look in the `fonts/NotoSans/unhinted/variable-ttf` direcotry Actual Results: Only the weight axis is variable in this package Expected Results: The weight and width axis are variable in this package Changing the path at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/google-noto-fonts/blob/rawhide/f/google-… works for every variable font/script except for NotoKufiArabic, which has the complete font files in the `variable` dir. Before compression, this is ~16mb larger than before (total, across all subpackages). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2258723 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…

1 2

[Bug 2207623] New: Please branch and build mozilla-fira-fonts in epel9
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 15 May '24

15 May '24

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2207623 Bug ID: 2207623 Summary: Please branch and build mozilla-fira-fonts in epel9 Product: Fedora Version: 38 OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: mozilla-fira-fonts Severity: medium Assignee: relrod(a)redhat.com Reporter: redhat(a)skarbek.name QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: admiller(a)redhat.com, fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, relrod(a)redhat.com Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Please branch and build mozilla-fira-fonts in epel9. Reproducible: Always -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2207623

1 5

[Bug 2088665] New: Noto Sans is chosen to display symbol characters it doesn't contain
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 18 Mar '24

18 Mar '24

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2088665 Bug ID: 2088665 Summary: Noto Sans is chosen to display symbol characters it doesn't contain Product: Fedora Version: 36 Status: NEW Component: google-noto-fonts Assignee: tagoh(a)redhat.com Reporter: talk(a)danielflaum.net QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, petersen(a)redhat.com, psatpute(a)redhat.com, pwu(a)redhat.com, tagoh(a)redhat.com Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Created attachment 1881507 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1881507&action=edit A zipped sample PDF and image of relevant portion of PDF when affected by the issue Description of problem: Given a PDF lacking embedded fonts which use certain characters (including → and ≥), GNOME's Evince on Fedora 36 chooses to substitute the Noto Sans font, which does not include these characters. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): How reproducible: Successfully reproduced by two people independently. Steps to Reproduce: 1. Boot a fresh copy of Fedora 36 (the Live version in a VM will do). 2. Open the attached sample PDF in GNOME Evince (aka Document Viewer). 3. Observe the missing characters in the second paragraph from the top of the page. Actual results: See attached image. Expected results: The missing characters should be displayed properly as → (that is, https://unicode-table.com/en/2192/) Additional info: The filer initially sought help at https://ask.fedoraproject.org/t/missing-characters-in-pdfs-since-upgrade-fr…, which may be informative in reproducing the issue. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2088665

1 26

[Bug 2093080] New: Default fonts for Arabic do not match the font packages list
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 15 Mar '24

15 Mar '24

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2093080 Bug ID: 2093080 Summary: Default fonts for Arabic do not match the font packages list Product: Fedora Version: 36 Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: fontconfig Severity: medium Assignee: tagoh(a)redhat.com Reporter: awilliam(a)redhat.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: ajax(a)redhat.com, caillon+fedoraproject(a)gmail.com, fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, gnome-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, mclasen(a)redhat.com, pnemade(a)redhat.com, rhughes(a)redhat.com, rstrode(a)redhat.com, sandmann(a)redhat.com, tagoh(a)redhat.com Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora There's a test case: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_i18n_default_fonts which requires checking the default fonts for various languages against a list, http://tagoh.fedorapeople.org/fonts/fc-test.sh . The current default fonts for Arabic installs do not match the list. The list states sans should be DejaVu Sans, serif should be FreeSerif or MPH 2B Damase, and mono should be DejaVu Sans Mono. These may have been changed recently, as our openQA reference text file expects them to be Noto Naskh Arabic (for both sans and serif?) and PakType Naskh Basic for mono. In any case, what we actually see doesn't match either the list or the openQA reference file. We see "Noto Sans Arabic" and "PakType Naqsh" in the output from the test, I think for serif (yes really) and monospace respectively. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2093080

1 20

[Bug 1761885] New: rpm -V complains about mode for ghost .uuid files
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 24 Feb '24

24 Feb '24

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1761885 Bug ID: 1761885 Summary: rpm -V complains about mode for ghost .uuid files Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: fontpackages Assignee: nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net Reporter: mtasaka(a)fedoraproject.org QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net, paul(a)frixxon.co.uk, redhat-bugzilla(a)linuxnetz.de, tagoh(a)redhat.com Target Milestone: --- Link ID: Red Hat Bugzilla 1564432 Classification: Fedora Description of problem: rpm -Va complains a lot about mode of %ghost .uuid files: .M....... g /usr/share/fonts/paktype-naqsh/.uuid .M....... g /usr/share/fonts/lilypond/.uuid .M....... g /usr/share/fonts/sil-padauk/.uuid .M....... g /usr/share/fonts/google-droid/.uuid .M....... g /usr/share/fonts/lilypond/.uuid .M....... g /usr/share/fonts/smc-suruma/.uuid .M....... g /usr/share/fonts/google-android-emoji/.uuid .M....... g /usr/share/fonts/google-crosextra-carlito/.uuid .M....... g /usr/share/fonts/lohit-assamese/.uuid .M....... g /usr/share/fonts/dejavu/.uuid .M....... g /usr/share/fonts/lohit-telugu/.uuid .M....... g /usr/share/fonts/lilypond/.uuid ..... Looks like fontpackages-devel template rpmmacro creates .uuid which %ghost %atttr(0000) e.g. [root@localhost ~]# rpm -qf /usr/share/fonts/google-droid/.uuid google-droid-sans-fonts-20120715-16.fc31.noarch [root@localhost ~]# rpm -qlv google-droid-sans-fonts | grep uuid ---------- 1 root root 0 7月 25 23:03 /usr/share/fonts/google-droid/.uuid ref: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/fontpackages/blob/master/f/fontpackages-… but I guess %transfiletriggerin script by fontconfig creates .uuid as 0755 permission (perhaps) Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): fontpackages-filesystem-1.44-25.fc31.noarch fontconfig-2.13.92-3.fc31.x86_64 fontconfig-2.13.92-3.fc31.i686 google-droid-sans-fonts-20120715-16.fc31.noarch How reproducible: 100% Steps to Reproduce: 1. See above, try $ rpm -Va 2. 3. Actual results: See above, lots of .uuid permission complaint Expected results: No complaint by rpm -Va Additional info: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 20

[Bug 2112732] New: Fail to build from source
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 18 Feb '24

18 Feb '24

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2112732 Bug ID: 2112732 Summary: Fail to build from source Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: campivisivi-titillium-fonts Assignee: luya_tfz(a)thefinalzone.net Reporter: tagoh(a)redhat.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, luya_tfz(a)thefinalzone.net Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Description of problem: Titillium_roman_upright_italic_2_0_OT.zip contains two directory. one is Titillium_roman_upright_italic_2_0_OT which is specified as a base directory in the spec file. another one is __MACOSX. the spec file doesn't clean up __MACOSX, thus, the build stop on extracting like: + /usr/lib/rpm/rpmuncompress -x /var/home/tagoh/rpmbuild/SOURCES/Titillium_roman_upright_italic_2_0_OT.zip replace __MACOSX/Titillium_roman_upright_italic_2_0_OT/._Titillium-Black.otf? [y]es, [n]o, [A]ll, [N]one, [r]ename: Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): campivisivi-titillium-fonts-20120913-25.fc37 How reproducible: always Steps to Reproduce: 1.download SRPM 2.rpmbuild --rebuild campivisivi-titillium-fonts-20120913-25.fc37.src.rpm 3.try again once the rebuild finished. Actual results: the rebuild always fails except first try. Expected results: the rebuild should be successfully finished any time. Additional info: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2112732

1 4

[Bug 2259962] New: noto symbol font incorrect for PDF / Postscript
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 01 Feb '24

01 Feb '24

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2259962 Bug ID: 2259962 Summary: noto symbol font incorrect for PDF / Postscript Product: Fedora Version: 39 URL: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1SrcMEFqI26un4MAxh2OHd oTbOi9hgM4v OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: google-noto-fonts Keywords: Desktop Severity: medium Assignee: tagoh(a)redhat.com Reporter: vk2bea(a)gmail.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, petersen(a)redhat.com, pwu(a)redhat.com, tagoh(a)redhat.com Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora google-noto-fonts package installs configuration files - /etc/fonts/conf.d/58-google-noto-sans-symbols2.conf and /etc/fonts/conf.d/58-google-noto-sans-symbols-vf.conf which cause Postscript platform font /Symbol to use NotoSansSymbols[wght].ttf # fc-match Symbol NotoSansSymbols[wght].ttf: "Noto Sans Symbols" "Regular" This font does not have the glyphs required for the standard platform font "Symbol" https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Symbol_(typeface) This should not hijack /Symbol name ... the correct file could be StandardSymbolsPS.t1. This results in PDF files that use the Symbol font to produce no or wrong characters for the glyphs (example /Omega or /degree (see PDF file https://drive.google.com/file/d/1SrcMEFqI26un4MAxh2OHdoTbOi9hgM4v) This file renders correctly using browsers (Chrome Firefox or Ghostscript) because they include Postscript core fonts but evince, okular, atril rely on Fedora to provide fonts. These applications do not render the symbol glyphs Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: view PDF with symbol glyphs from Postscript standard symbol font Actual Results: no symbol glyphs shown for PDF viewers using Fedora fonts (rather than built in Postscript core fonts) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2259962 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…

1 8

[Bug 2261113] New: freetype: FTBFS in Fedora rawhide/f40
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 30 Jan '24

30 Jan '24

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2261113 Bug ID: 2261113 Summary: freetype: FTBFS in Fedora rawhide/f40 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: freetype Assignee: mkasik(a)redhat.com Reporter: releng(a)fedoraproject.org QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: ajax(a)redhat.com, fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, gnome-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, mclasen(a)redhat.com, mkasik(a)redhat.com, rstrode(a)redhat.com Blocks: 2231791 (F40FTBFS) Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora freetype failed to build from source in Fedora rawhide/f40 https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=112260144 For details on the mass rebuild see: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_40_Mass_Rebuild Please fix freetype at your earliest convenience and set the bug's status to ASSIGNED when you start fixing it. If the bug remains in NEW state for 8 weeks, freetype will be orphaned. Before branching of Fedora 41, freetype will be retired, if it still fails to build. For more details on the FTBFS policy, please visit: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Fails_to_build_from_source_Fails… Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2231791 [Bug 2231791] Fedora 40 FTBFS Tracker -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2261113 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…

1 4

[Bug 2257809] New: CVE-2023-45139 fonttools: XML External Entity Injection (XXE) Vulnerability [fedora-all]
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 24 Jan '24

24 Jan '24

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2257809 Bug ID: 2257809 Summary: CVE-2023-45139 fonttools: XML External Entity Injection (XXE) Vulnerability [fedora-all] Product: Fedora Version: 39 Status: NEW Component: fonttools Keywords: Security, SecurityTracking Severity: high Priority: high Assignee: pnemade(a)redhat.com Reporter: trathi(a)redhat.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, pnemade(a)redhat.com, tagoh(a)redhat.com Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora More information about this security flaw is available in the following bug: http://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2257808 Disclaimer: Community trackers are created by Red Hat Product Security team on a best effort basis. Package maintainers are required to ascertain if the flaw indeed affects their package, before starting the update process. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2257809 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…

1 6

[Bug 2077991] CVE-2022-27405 FreeType: Segmentation violation via FNT_Size_Request
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 24 Jan '24

24 Jan '24

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2077991 errata-xmlrpc <errata-xmlrpc(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Link ID| |Red Hat Product Errata | |RHSA-2024:0420 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2077991

1 0

[Bug 2077989] CVE-2022-27404 FreeType: Buffer overflow in sfnt_init_face
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 24 Jan '24

24 Jan '24

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2077989 errata-xmlrpc <errata-xmlrpc(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Link ID| |Red Hat Product Errata | |RHSA-2024:0420 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2077989

1 0

[Bug 2077985] CVE-2022-27406 Freetype: Segmentation violation via FT_Request_Size
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 24 Jan '24

24 Jan '24

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2077985 errata-xmlrpc <errata-xmlrpc(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Link ID| |Red Hat Product Errata | |RHSA-2024:0420 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2077985

1 0

[Bug 2077991] CVE-2022-27405 FreeType: Segmentation violation via FNT_Size_Request
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 24 Jan '24

24 Jan '24

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2077991 --- Comment #8 from errata-xmlrpc <errata-xmlrpc(a)redhat.com> --- This issue has been addressed in the following products: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.6 Extended Update Support Via RHSA-2024:0420 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:0420 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2077991 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…

1 0

[Bug 2077985] CVE-2022-27406 Freetype: Segmentation violation via FT_Request_Size
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 24 Jan '24

24 Jan '24

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2077985 --- Comment #9 from errata-xmlrpc <errata-xmlrpc(a)redhat.com> --- This issue has been addressed in the following products: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.6 Extended Update Support Via RHSA-2024:0420 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:0420 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2077985 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…

1 0

[Bug 2077989] CVE-2022-27404 FreeType: Buffer overflow in sfnt_init_face
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 24 Jan '24

24 Jan '24

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2077989 --- Comment #8 from errata-xmlrpc <errata-xmlrpc(a)redhat.com> --- This issue has been addressed in the following products: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.6 Extended Update Support Via RHSA-2024:0420 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:0420 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2077989 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…

1 0

[Bug 1580458] [ta_IN] Error in latest Tamil ttf
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 24 Jan '24

24 Jan '24

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1580458 --- Comment #16 from Sudip Shil <sshil(a)redhat.com> --- PR created in upstream: https://github.com/lohit-fonts/lohit-tamil-fonts/pull/1 Will update in fedora rpms soon after this PR is accepted -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1580458 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…

1 0

URGENT!! ORDERS 1-24-2024
by =?UTF-8?B?IlZpY2t5Lmd1IOmUgOWUrumHjyI8dmlja3kuZ3VA?=lists.fedoraproject.org＠fedoraproject.org 23 Jan '24

23 Jan '24

Good Morning dear, We have called your office many times and also sent many emails to your office mail but no reply, we need to re-order some of your products urgently for this January. Please check attached sample photos and give us quotations and your fastest delivery date. 谢谢~ ***CNY Holiday Notice: From Feb. 8th. To Feb 18th.*** 所有进仓通知/预配请在截单货前1个工作日中午前给到，否则我司不予安排发货！ Best Regards J Vicky Gu 外贸中心船务科浙江亿力机电股份有限公司 ZHEJIANG YILI MACHINERY AND ELECTRIC CO., LTD Tel: 021-64892121-1037 Email: vicky.gu(a)yili-biz.com Web: http://www.yili-biz.com Add: NO.111 LINGXIU ROAD LUOXING STREET JIASHAN ZHEJIANG P.R.CHINA 314100 寄单地址：上海市闵行区向阳路1318号

1 0

[Bug 2210428] Red Hat Mono Regular shows up as italic
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 18 Jan '24

18 Jan '24

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2210428 Akira TAGOH <tagoh(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tagoh(a)redhat.com --- Comment #2 from Akira TAGOH <tagoh(a)redhat.com> --- This should be fixed in redhat-fonts-4.0.3-5. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2210428 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…

1 0

[Bug 1580458] [ta_IN] Error in latest Tamil ttf
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 16 Jan '24

16 Jan '24

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1580458 --- Comment #15 from Sudip Shil <sshil(a)redhat.com> --- Lohit-Tamil ttf screenshot: http://bit.ly/screenshotTamil (version mismatch) NotoSansTamil-Regular ttf screenshot: https://bit.ly/NotoSansTamilRegularScreenshotSudip (unicode value: U+0ba8), (unicode char: ந) | (unicode value: U+0bb0), (unicode char: ர) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1580458 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…

1 0

[Bug 2217137] New: freetype-2.13.1 is available
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 16 Jan '24

16 Jan '24

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2217137 Bug ID: 2217137 Summary: freetype-2.13.1 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: freetype Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee: mkasik(a)redhat.com Reporter: upstream-release-monitoring(a)fedoraproject.org QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: ajax(a)redhat.com, fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, gnome-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, mclasen(a)redhat.com, mkasik(a)redhat.com, rstrode(a)redhat.com Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Releases retrieved: 2.13.1 Upstream release that is considered latest: 2.13.1 Current version/release in rawhide: 2.13.0-1.fc39 URL: https://www.freetype.org/ Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/ More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/package-maintainers/Upstream_Release_M… Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added upstream. Based on the information from Anitya: https://release-monitoring.org/project/854/ To change the monitoring settings for the project, please visit: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/freetype -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2217137 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…

1 6

[Bug 2186430] New: CVE-2023-2004 freetype: integer overflowin in tt_hvadvance_adjust() in src/truetype/ttgxvar.c [fedora-all]
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 15 Jan '24

15 Jan '24

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2186430 Bug ID: 2186430 Summary: CVE-2023-2004 freetype: integer overflowin in tt_hvadvance_adjust() in src/truetype/ttgxvar.c [fedora-all] Product: Fedora Version: 37 Status: NEW Component: freetype Keywords: Security, SecurityTracking Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: mkasik(a)redhat.com Reporter: trathi(a)redhat.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: ajax(a)redhat.com, fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, gnome-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, mclasen(a)redhat.com, mkasik(a)redhat.com, rstrode(a)redhat.com, sandmann(a)redhat.com Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora More information about this security flaw is available in the following bug: http://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2186428 Disclaimer: Community trackers are created by Red Hat Product Security team on a best effort basis. Package maintainers are required to ascertain if the flaw indeed affects their package, before starting the update process. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2186430

1 4

[Bug 2257911] New: fonttools-4.47.2 is available
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 12 Jan '24

12 Jan '24

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2257911 Bug ID: 2257911 Summary: fonttools-4.47.2 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: fonttools Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee: pnemade(a)redhat.com Reporter: upstream-release-monitoring(a)fedoraproject.org QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, pnemade(a)redhat.com, tagoh(a)redhat.com Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Releases retrieved: 4.47.1, 4.47.2 Upstream release that is considered latest: 4.47.2 Current version/release in rawhide: 4.47.0-1.fc40 URL: https://github.com/fonttools/fonttools/ Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/ More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/package-maintainers/Upstream_Release_M… Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added upstream. Based on the information from Anitya: https://release-monitoring.org/project/7388/ To change the monitoring settings for the project, please visit: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/fonttools -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2257911 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…

1 4

[Bug 2210428] Red Hat Mono Regular shows up as italic
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 04 Jan '24

04 Jan '24

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2210428 Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproj | |ect.org -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2210428

1 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

fonts-bugs January 2024