https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1999864
Bug ID: 1999864
Summary: Cannot find package with font for Coptic although such
a package exists for Fedora 34
Product: Fedora
Version: 34
Status: NEW
Component: fontconfig
Assignee: tagoh(a)redhat.com
Reporter: mfabian(a)redhat.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: ajax(a)redhat.com, caillon+fedoraproject(a)gmail.com,
fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
gnome-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, mclasen(a)redhat.com,
pnemade(a)redhat.com, rhughes(a)redhat.com,
rstrode(a)redhat.com, sandmann(a)redhat.com,
tagoh(a)redhat.com
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
Created attachment 1819530
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1819530&action=edit
Gnome Software unable to find Coptic fonts
Using Fedora-Workstation-Live-x86_64-34-1.2.iso in qemu.
I played with emoji picker and Gnome popped up something requesting more fonts.
I clicked and then Gnome Software said:
“Unable to find the Coptic, Persian, Old (ca. 600-400 B.C.), Ugaritic you were
searching for. Please see _the documentation_ for more information.”
See attached screenshot.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2251384
Bug ID: 2251384
Summary: Wrong Arabic font prioritization in several apps.
(Droid kufi prioritized over noto-sans)
Product: Fedora
Version: 39
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Component: fontconfig
Severity: low
Assignee: tagoh(a)redhat.com
Reporter: alawamiaz(a)gmail.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: ajax(a)redhat.com, fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
gnome-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, mclasen(a)redhat.com,
rstrode(a)redhat.com, tagoh(a)redhat.com
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
Description of problem:
Few fedora releases ago, Noto-Sans-Arabic was set to be the default. It was
working fine and Arabic text was displayed in all web browsers using this font.
sometime in last few months, every web browser in fedora suddenly started
prioritizing "Druid Kufi" font over noto-sans-arabic. which now looks makes
arabic text looks jarring.
Interestingly, when running from live usb image, noto-sans-arabic is correctly
priotirized and being used to render all arabic web pages, but only for FEW
MINUTES and then suddenly it's switched to druid kufi!, without updating
anything, just running Firefox for few minutes.
It's also reproducible after fresh install, the first 3 minutes of using the
new fedora installation, Firefox and other browsers are displaying noto-sans
then suddenly switch to druid kufi.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
38-39
How reproducible:
Consistently
Steps to Reproduce:
1.Connect to internet
2.Open arabic webpage in firefox (ex, wikipedia)
3.text would be displayed with druid kufi instead of the default
noto-sans-arabic which was chosen to be the default sometime around fedora 36.
Actual results:
Arabic Text displayed with druid kufi font
Expected results:
Arabic text should be displayed using noto-sans-arabic as was the case before.
Additional info:
The font in gnome and top bars is still correctly displayed using
noto-sans-arabic. It's browsers that exhibit the problem.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2251384
Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2247028
Bug ID: 2247028
Summary: fonttools fails to build with Python 3.13: error:
implicit declaration of function ‘_PyLong_Copy’
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: fonttools
Assignee: pnemade(a)redhat.com
Reporter: ksurma(a)redhat.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, ksurma(a)redhat.com,
mhroncok(a)redhat.com, pnemade(a)redhat.com,
tagoh(a)redhat.com
Blocks: 2244836 (PYTHON3.13)
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
fonttools fails to build with Python 3.13.0a1.
This report is automated and not very verbose, but we'll try to get back here
with details.
Lib/fontTools/qu2cu/qu2cu.c: In function ‘__Pyx_PyLong_AbsNeg’:
Lib/fontTools/qu2cu/qu2cu.c:10421:26: error: implicit declaration of function
‘_PyLong_Copy’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
10421 | PyObject *copy = _PyLong_Copy((PyLongObject*)n);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~
https://docs.python.org/3.13/whatsnew/3.13.html
For the build logs, see:
https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/@python/python3.13/fedora-r…
For all our attempts to build fonttools with Python 3.13, see:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/g/python/python3.13/package/fonttoo…
Testing and mass rebuild of packages is happening in copr.
You can follow these instructions to test locally in mock if your package
builds with Python 3.13:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/g/python/python3.13/
Let us know here if you have any questions.
Python 3.13 is planned to be included in Fedora 41.
To make that update smoother, we're building Fedora packages with all
pre-releases of Python 3.13.
A build failure prevents us from testing all dependent packages (transitive
[Build]Requires),
so if this package is required a lot, it's important for us to get it fixed
soon.
We'd appreciate help from the people who know this package best,
but if you don't want to work on this now, let us know so we can try to work
around it on our side.
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2244836
[Bug 2244836] Python 3.13
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2247028
Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2245798
Bug ID: 2245798
Summary: fontforge fails to build with Python 3.13: error:
implicit declaration of function `Py_SetProgramName`
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: fontforge
Assignee: kevin(a)scrye.com
Reporter: ksurma(a)redhat.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, kevin(a)scrye.com,
ksurma(a)redhat.com, mhroncok(a)redhat.com,
pnemade(a)redhat.com
Blocks: 2231791 (F40FTBFS,RAWHIDEFTBFS), 2244836 (PYTHON3.13)
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
fontforge fails to build with Python 3.13.0a1.
/builddir/build/BUILD/fontforge-20230101/fontforge/python.c:19636:5: error:
implicit declaration of function ‘Py_SetProgramName’; did you mean
‘Py_GetProgramName’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
19636 | Py_SetProgramName(saved_progname);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
| Py_GetProgramName
Py_SetProgramName has been removed from Python 3.13.
According to https://docs.python.org/3.13/whatsnew/3.13.html:
Py_SetProgramName(): set PyConfig.program_name instead.
https://docs.python.org/3.13/whatsnew/3.13.html
For the build logs, see:
https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/@python/python3.13/fedora-r…
For all our attempts to build fontforge with Python 3.13, see:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/g/python/python3.13/package/fontfor…
Testing and mass rebuild of packages is happening in copr.
You can follow these instructions to test locally in mock if your package
builds with Python 3.13:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/g/python/python3.13/
Let us know here if you have any questions.
Python 3.13 is planned to be included in Fedora 41.
To make that update smoother, we're building Fedora packages with all
pre-releases of Python 3.13.
A build failure prevents us from testing all dependent packages (transitive
[Build]Requires),
so if this package is required a lot, it's important for us to get it fixed
soon.
We'd appreciate help from the people who know this package best,
but if you don't want to work on this now, let us know so we can try to work
around it on our side.
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2231791
[Bug 2231791] Fedora 40 FTBFS Tracker
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2244836
[Bug 2244836] Python 3.13
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2245798
Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2258723
Bug ID: 2258723
Summary: Variable fonts packages dont include all axis
Product: Fedora
Version: 39
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Component: google-noto-fonts
Keywords: RFE
Severity: low
Assignee: tagoh(a)redhat.com
Reporter: sharpenedblade(a)proton.me
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
petersen(a)redhat.com, pwu(a)redhat.com, tagoh(a)redhat.com
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
The *-vf packages package files from the `slim-variable-ttf` dir, which do not
include every axis available for the font. Variable font files with all
supported axis are in `variable-ttf` dir instead.
Reproducible: Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Install `google-noto-sans-vf`
2. Check which axis are supported
3. Download
`https://github.com/notofonts/notofonts.github.io/archive/refs/tags/noto-monthly-release-23.8.1.tar.gz`
and look in the `fonts/NotoSans/unhinted/variable-ttf` direcotry
Actual Results:
Only the weight axis is variable in this package
Expected Results:
The weight and width axis are variable in this package
Changing the path at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/google-noto-fonts/blob/rawhide/f/google-…
works for every variable font/script except for NotoKufiArabic, which has the
complete font files in the `variable` dir.
Before compression, this is ~16mb larger than before (total, across all
subpackages).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2258723
Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2207623
Bug ID: 2207623
Summary: Please branch and build mozilla-fira-fonts in epel9
Product: Fedora
Version: 38
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Component: mozilla-fira-fonts
Severity: medium
Assignee: relrod(a)redhat.com
Reporter: redhat(a)skarbek.name
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: admiller(a)redhat.com,
fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, relrod(a)redhat.com
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
Please branch and build mozilla-fira-fonts in epel9.
Reproducible: Always
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2207623
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2253923
Parag Nemade <pnemade(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Resolution|--- |NOTABUG
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Last Closed| |2024-04-23 03:30:51
--- Comment #16 from Parag Nemade <pnemade(a)redhat.com> ---
Thanks for your comment.
Please do keep reporting bugs as and when you find them.
But good to add one more comment to bug about what were you doing when that bug
occurred. This will help us to follow same steps to reproduce reported bug.
Bugs detected by Fedora shows how many times its detected. So if you find count
more than 1 time bug is detected then you can try to remember what were you
doing that might have caused that bug detected by Fedora on your system.
Right now I am closing this bug as there is not much information available on
how to reproduce this bug.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2253923
Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2253923
Sylvain Arth <sylvain(a)gwenved.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Flags|needinfo?(sylvain(a)gwenved.o |
|rg) |
--- Comment #15 from Sylvain Arth <sylvain(a)gwenved.org> ---
I'd like to answer, to the question "How to reproduce" because I really can't.
Nowadays; all my Fedora OS machines are running as virtual machines on two
different Windows servers.
The main purpose of those instances is to act as servers for mails, DNS, NTP
and many other usual servers like that.
Punctually, I use them for comparison about possibly different behaviour about
"mock-up software" of my personal coding in Ada complied with GNAT.
In other words, I usually just check by emails that all those V-machines and
servers are still in good health.
I very rarely fall into the bug I reported, whilst I'm currently doing anything
on.
Most of the time, It's after reboot-startup (clean or dirty because of some
failure of the hosting PC), at login time I get the warning about bugs detected
by Fedora.
I could ignore them, but my thought is that it could help bug solving, with
providing more data, even "raw" ones.
I very know this is not quite at all the best bug reporting way.
But I also know (I was famous about that prior I retired) my "bug catcher"
reputation.
In other words, I tend to fall into bug traps other people never fall in.
I ignore why about this, I just know it's a fact.
I just suspect it's because I've my own way to do things that is often not the
"most common way to do things".
But if my reports are rather totally useless, just tell me that's the actual
case.
If so, I will totally stop top sending such kind of reports, to only report
those I'm able to tell something like a clue about "how to reproduce,
possibly".
Regards
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2253923
Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…