https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2284076
Bug ID: 2284076
Summary: Directory is missing in RPM database.
Product: Fedora
Version: 40
Hardware: x86_64
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Component: fontconfig
Severity: medium
Assignee: tagoh(a)redhat.com
Reporter: pampelmuse(a)gmx.at
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: ajax(a)redhat.com, fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
gnome-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, mclasen(a)redhat.com,
rstrode(a)redhat.com, tagoh(a)redhat.com
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
The following directory is missing in RPM database:
/usr/lib/fontconfig/
Reproducible: Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1. rpm -qf /usr/lib/fontconfig/
file /usr/lib/fontconfig is not owned by any package
Actual Results:
not owned by any package
Expected Results:
fontconfig-2.15.0-4.fc40.x86_64
In spec file line 181 please add:
%dir /usr/lib/fontconfig/
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2284076
Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1490184
Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Flags|needinfo?(petersen(a)redhat.c |
|om) |
Resolution|--- |CURRENTRELEASE
Status|POST |CLOSED
Last Closed|2023-09-26 04:19:44 |2024-05-30 05:16:18
--- Comment #11 from Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> ---
Ah right thanks - I even did the koji builds, lol
Thanks for the clarification
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1490184
Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2210428
Aoife Moloney <amoloney(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Resolution|--- |EOL
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Last Closed| |2024-05-22 11:12:48
--- Comment #4 from Aoife Moloney <amoloney(a)redhat.com> ---
Fedora Linux 38 entered end-of-life (EOL) status on 2024-05-21.
Fedora Linux 38 is no longer maintained, which means that it
will not receive any further security or bug fix updates. As a result we
are closing this bug.
If you can reproduce this bug against a currently maintained version of Fedora
Linux
please feel free to reopen this bug against that version. Note that the version
field may be hidden. Click the "Show advanced fields" button if you do not see
the version field.
If you are unable to reopen this bug, please file a new report against an
active release.
Thank you for reporting this bug and we are sorry it could not be fixed.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2210428
Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2282132
Bug ID: 2282132
Summary: CVE-2024-35195 google-roboto-mono-fonts: requests:
subsequent requests to the same host ignore cert
verification [fedora-all]
Product: Fedora
Version: 40
Status: NEW
Component: google-roboto-mono-fonts
Keywords: Security, SecurityTracking
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
Assignee: link(a)sub-pop.net
Reporter: ybuenos(a)redhat.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, link(a)sub-pop.net
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
More information about this security flaw is available in the following bug:
http://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2282114
Disclaimer: Community trackers are created by Red Hat Product Security team on
a best effort basis. Package maintainers are required to ascertain if the flaw
indeed affects their package, before starting the update process.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2282132
Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…