https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2315321
Akira TAGOH <tagoh(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Resolution|--- |WORKSFORME
Last Closed| |2024-09-30 12:07:18
--- Comment #1 from Akira TAGOH <tagoh(a)redhat.com> ---
All the man pages regarding API is available in fontconfig-devel subpackage.
$ rpm -qf /usr/share/man/man3/FcPatternFormat.3.gz
fontconfig-devel-2.15.0-6.fc40.x86_64
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2315321
Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2213602
Bug ID: 2213602
Summary: update to version 7.0
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Component: paktype-naskh-basic-fonts
Severity: medium
Assignee: extras-orphan(a)fedoraproject.org
Reporter: petersen(a)redhat.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: extras-orphan(a)fedoraproject.org,
fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
psatpute(a)redhat.com, vishalvijayraghavan(a)gmail.com
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
Currently we have version 6.0 in Fedora.
In April 7.0 was released.
Reproducible: Always
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2213602
Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2315497
Bug ID: 2315497
Summary: Please branch and build adobe-source-code-pro-fonts in
epel10
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: adobe-source-code-pro-fonts
Assignee: mattrose(a)folkwolf.net
Reporter: davide(a)cavalca.name
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, mark(a)net-c.com,
mattrose(a)folkwolf.net
Blocks: 1914423 (EPELPackagersSIG)
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
Please branch and build adobe-source-code-pro-fonts in epel10.
If you do not wish to maintain adobe-source-code-pro-fonts in epel10,
or do not think you will be able to do this in a timely manner,
the EPEL Packagers SIG would be happy to be a co-maintainer of the package;
please add the epel-packagers-sig group through
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/adobe-source-code-pro-fonts/addgroup
and grant it commit access, or collaborator access on epel* branches.
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1914423
[Bug 1914423] Tracker for epel-packagers-sig
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2315497
Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2315321
Nikola Forró <nforro(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
Component|man-pages |fontconfig
CC| |ajax(a)redhat.com,
| |fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproj
| |ect.org,
| |gnome-sig(a)lists.fedoraproje
| |ct.org,
| |i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproje
| |ct.org, mclasen(a)redhat.com,
| |rstrode(a)redhat.com,
| |tagoh(a)redhat.com
Assignee|nforro(a)redhat.com |tagoh(a)redhat.com
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2315321
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2312891
Bug ID: 2312891
Summary: liberation-fonts doesn't gets auto-replaced with
liberation-fonts-all on F40 -> F41 upgrade
Product: Fedora
Version: 41
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Component: liberation-fonts
Severity: medium
Assignee: petersen(a)redhat.com
Reporter: mateusrodcosta(a)gmail.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
gnome-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, mark(a)net-c.com,
mclasen(a)redhat.com, petersen(a)redhat.com,
rhughes(a)redhat.com, rstrode(a)redhat.com,
vishalvijayraghavan(a)gmail.com
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
When upgrading from Fedora Silverbue 40 to Fedora Silverblue 41,
liberation-fonts wasn't properly replaced with liberation-fonts-all, causing
dependency issues
I managed to fix it manually but ideally it should have been replaced
automatically.
The dependency error message (which I didn't copy as I had borken terminal due
to a separate GTK issue) basically seemed to be from liberation-fonts rewuiring
specific versions of the sans, serif and mono fonts, preventing their upgrades.
Reproducible: Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Upgrade from F40 to F41 Beta with liberation-fonts installed
2. Check for dependency slving issues
3.
Actual Results:
Dependency issues on Fedorea Silveblue 41
Expected Results:
No issues
Interestingly the problem only appeared on my first transaction after the F41
rebase
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2312891
Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2314038
Bug ID: 2314038
Summary: F40 to F41 system-upgrade fails due to
google-noto-fonts conflicts
Product: Fedora
Version: 40
Hardware: x86_64
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Component: google-noto-fonts
Keywords: Upgrades
Severity: medium
Assignee: tagoh(a)redhat.com
Reporter: sebastian.spree(a)web.de
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
petersen(a)redhat.com, pwu(a)redhat.com, tagoh(a)redhat.com
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
I am on Fedora 40. It's a Cinnamon installation, but I have also Budgie, GNOME
and Cosmic (COPR) installed. I am running mainly GNOME.
Upgrading to Fedora 41 beta fails due to:
Running transaction check
Error: transaction check vs depsolve:
google-noto-sans-meeteimayek-vf-fonts < 20240701-2.fc41 is obsoleted by
google-noto-sans-meetei-mayek-vf-fonts-20240701-2.fc41.noarch
google-noto-sans-symbols2-fonts < 20240701-2.fc41 is obsoleted by
google-noto-sans-symbols-2-fonts-20240701-2.fc41.noarch
openjpeg2 < 2.5.2-2 is obsoleted by openjpeg-2.5.2-3.fc41.x86_64
google-noto-fonts-common = 20240301-2.fc40 is needed by (installed)
google-noto-sans-symbols2-fonts-20240301-2.fc40.noarch
google-noto-fonts-common = 20240301-2.fc40 is needed by (installed)
google-noto-sans-meeteimayek-vf-fonts-20240301-2.fc40.noarch
google-noto-fonts-common = 20240301-2.fc40 is needed by (installed)
google-noto-sans-symbols2-fonts-20240301-2.fc40.noarch
google-noto-fonts-common = 20240301-2.fc40 is needed by (installed)
google-noto-sans-meeteimayek-vf-fonts-20240301-2.fc40.noarch
To diagnose the problem, try running: 'rpm -Va --nofiles --nodigest'.
You probably have corrupted RPMDB, running 'rpm --rebuilddb' might fix the
issue.
The downloaded packages were saved in cache until the next successful
transaction.
You can remove cached packages by executing 'dnf clean packages'
Reproducible: Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1.run sudo dnf upgrade --refresh
2.reboot
3.run sudo dnf system-upgrade --best download --releasever=41
Actual Results:
upgrade fails due to dependency conflicts
Expected Results:
upgrade should succeed
Trying to resolve this by removing
google-noto-sans-symbols2-fonts-20240301-2.fc40.noarch
google-noto-sans-meeteimayek-vf-fonts-20240301-2.fc40.noarch
google-noto-sans-symbols2-fonts-20240301-2.fc40.noarch
google-noto-sans-meeteimayek-vf-fonts-20240301-2.fc40.noarch
fails with
Running transaction check
Error: transaction check vs depsolve:
rit-meera-new-fonts is needed by (installed)
default-fonts-ml-4.0-13.fc40.noarch
To diagnose the problem, try running: 'rpm -Va --nofiles --nodigest'.
You probably have corrupted RPMDB, running 'rpm --rebuilddb' might fix the
issue.
Running rpm --rebuilddb does not fix the situation.
For output of
rpm -Va --nofiles --nodigest
see attachement
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2314038
Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1999864
Bug ID: 1999864
Summary: Cannot find package with font for Coptic although such
a package exists for Fedora 34
Product: Fedora
Version: 34
Status: NEW
Component: fontconfig
Assignee: tagoh(a)redhat.com
Reporter: mfabian(a)redhat.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: ajax(a)redhat.com, caillon+fedoraproject(a)gmail.com,
fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
gnome-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, mclasen(a)redhat.com,
pnemade(a)redhat.com, rhughes(a)redhat.com,
rstrode(a)redhat.com, sandmann(a)redhat.com,
tagoh(a)redhat.com
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
Created attachment 1819530
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1819530&action=edit
Gnome Software unable to find Coptic fonts
Using Fedora-Workstation-Live-x86_64-34-1.2.iso in qemu.
I played with emoji picker and Gnome popped up something requesting more fonts.
I clicked and then Gnome Software said:
“Unable to find the Coptic, Persian, Old (ca. 600-400 B.C.), Ugaritic you were
searching for. Please see _the documentation_ for more information.”
See attached screenshot.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2308744
Bug ID: 2308744
Summary: Upgrade Fira Sans to version 4.301 (post-Mozilla
involvement) and package FiraGO
Product: Fedora
Version: 40
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Component: mozilla-fira-fonts
Severity: medium
Assignee: ego.cordatus(a)gmail.com
Reporter: mateusrodcosta(a)gmail.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: admiller(a)redhat.com, ego.cordatus(a)gmail.com,
fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
From https://bboxtype.com/fira/ :
> Originally designed as a typeface for the Mozilla OS, Fira Sans has developed towards a standalone Open Font project. In 2012, we designed the firstversion of Fira in cooperation with Erik Spiekermann and Mozilla. Over the next years, Fira covered more and more languages and provided further weights and styles.
> In 2016, with version 4.2, Mozilla decided to not put effort into the project anymore and in fact quit (please note that their Git is not up to date). Since 2016, we advance the project with the help of different partners. Fira Sans 4.3 will presumably be the last version. All upcoming extensions will be based on FiraGO.
Essentially Mozilla stopped working on Fira Sans but it was kept being worked
on by bBox Type GmbH.
This might also make a opportunity to migrate to the Fira Mono version by bBox
Type GmbH and also package FiraGo which isn't packaged yet.
For more info about Fira GO vs Fira Sans:
https://bboxtype.com/downloads/Projects/FiraGO_FiraSans_180109.pdf
Migrating to the bBox Type versions might requiring renaming of the package to
drop the "mozilla" prefix, as Mozilla is not involved anymore.
Reproducible: Always
This is essentially a request to move the Fira Sans e Fira Mono fonts from the
Mozilla upstream to the bBox Type upstream.
As an extra it's also a request to separately start packaging FiraGO, an
extended version of Fira Sans with improved language support.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2308744
Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…