fonts-bugs February 2025

fonts-bugs@lists.fedoraproject.org

1 participants
18 discussions

[Bug 1954359] Many emoji don't show up in Qt apps because qt does not handle 'emoji' font family
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 07 May '25

07 May '25

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1954359 --- Comment #18 from Peng Wu <pwu(a)redhat.com> --- Okay, I will submit the change to Qt upstream for review. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1954359 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…

2 1

[Bug 2321409] New: julietaula-montserrat-fonts-9.000 is available
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 21 Apr '25

21 Apr '25

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2321409 Bug ID: 2321409 Summary: julietaula-montserrat-fonts-9.000 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: julietaula-montserrat-fonts Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee: luya_tfz(a)thefinalzone.net Reporter: upstream-release-monitoring(a)fedoraproject.org QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, luya_tfz(a)thefinalzone.net Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Releases retrieved: 9.000 Upstream release that is considered latest: 9.000 Current version/release in rawhide: 7.222-9.fc41 URL: https://github.com/JulietaUla/Montserrat/ Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/ More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/package-maintainers/Upstream_Release_M… Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added upstream. Based on the information from Anitya: https://release-monitoring.org/project/10157/ To change the monitoring settings for the project, please visit: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/julietaula-montserrat-fonts -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2321409 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…

1 4

[Bug 2334719] New: NotoSansHebrew-Regular missing several glyphs
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 12 Mar '25

12 Mar '25

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2334719 Bug ID: 2334719 Summary: NotoSansHebrew-Regular missing several glyphs Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: google-noto-fonts Assignee: tagoh(a)redhat.com Reporter: mattia.verga(a)proton.me QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, petersen(a)redhat.com, pwu(a)redhat.com, tagoh(a)redhat.com Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora While packaging the update of libreoffice, I got a new test failure due to a "missing font". The font (Noto Sans Hebrew) is indeed installed, but upstream gave me the hint to check if any missing glyph were responsible for the failure. From a quick comparison through fontforge, NotoSansHebrew-Regular provided by Fedora package is missing a lot of glyphs compared to upstream sources. Is there something I miss? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2334719 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…

1 11

[Bug 2277345] New: NotoSansMono[wght].ttf file name causes scripts with failglob enabled to fail
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 03 Mar '25

03 Mar '25

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2277345 Bug ID: 2277345 Summary: NotoSansMono[wght].ttf file name causes scripts with failglob enabled to fail Product: Fedora Version: 40 Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: google-noto-fonts Severity: medium Assignee: tagoh(a)redhat.com Reporter: hartsjc(a)redhat.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, petersen(a)redhat.com, pwu(a)redhat.com, tagoh(a)redhat.com Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora shopt failglob If set, patterns which fail to match filenames during pathname expansion result in an expansion error. Using this feature is good practice in scripts as helps prevent scripting mistakes; however, having file name with square brackets causes failures. And with Fedora 40 upgrade seems google-noto-sans-mono-vf-fonts-20240301-2.fc40.noarch has added one with: /usr/share/fonts/google-noto-vf/NotoSansMono[wght].ttf Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. Causes globs that don't expand to cause errors $ shopt -s failglob 2. Try use files from rpm as variable, and fail $ for file in $(rpm -q --list google-noto-sans-mono-vf-fonts) ; do [[ -f "/${file}" ]] || echo "${file}" done -bash: no match: /usr/share/fonts/google-noto-vf/NotoSansMono[wght].ttf 3. Note the RC $ echo $? 1 4. Or even command line $ rpm -qf /usr/share/fonts/google-noto-vf/NotoSansMono[wght].ttf -bash: no match: /usr/share/fonts/google-noto-vf/NotoSansMono[wght].ttf $ rpm -qf '/usr/share/fonts/google-noto-vf/NotoSansMono[wght].ttf' google-noto-sans-mono-vf-fonts-20240301-2.fc40.noarch Actual Results: -bash: no match: /usr/share/fonts/google-noto-vf/NotoSansMono[wght].ttf Expected Results: no error accessing files with failglob shopt enabled started fedora 40 upgrade, as daily script of mine fails because this file is included in initramfs too. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2277345 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…

1 6

[Bug 2274629] New: Please branch and build artwiz-aleczapka-fonts in epel9
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 27 Feb '25

27 Feb '25

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2274629 Bug ID: 2274629 Summary: Please branch and build artwiz-aleczapka-fonts in epel9 Product: Fedora EPEL Version: epel9 Status: NEW Component: artwiz-aleczapka-fonts Assignee: dchen(a)redhat.com Reporter: davide(a)cavalca.name QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: dchen(a)redhat.com, fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, spotrh(a)gmail.com Blocks: 1914423 (EPELPackagersSIG) Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Please branch and build artwiz-aleczapka-fonts in epel9. If you do not wish to maintain artwiz-aleczapka-fonts in epel9, or do not think you will be able to do this in a timely manner, the EPEL Packagers SIG would be happy to be a co-maintainer of the package; please add the epel-packagers-sig group through https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/artwiz-aleczapka-fonts/addgroup and grant it commit access, or collaborator access on epel* branches. Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1914423 [Bug 1914423] Tracker for epel-packagers-sig -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2274629 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…

1 10

[Bug 2342588] New: fonttools-4.55.7 is available
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 08 Feb '25

08 Feb '25

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2342588 Bug ID: 2342588 Summary: fonttools-4.55.7 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: fonttools Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee: pnemade(a)redhat.com Reporter: upstream-release-monitoring(a)fedoraproject.org QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, pnemade(a)redhat.com, tagoh(a)redhat.com Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Releases retrieved: 4.55.7 Upstream release that is considered latest: 4.55.7 Current version/release in rawhide: 4.55.6-1.fc42 URL: https://github.com/fonttools/fonttools/ Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/ More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/package-maintainers/Upstream_Release_M… Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added upstream. Based on the information from Anitya: https://release-monitoring.org/project/7388/ To change the monitoring settings for the project, please visit: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/fonttools -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2342588 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…

1 10

[Bug 2339920] New: baekmuk-bdf-fonts: FTBFS in Fedora rawhide/f42
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 06 Feb '25

06 Feb '25

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2339920 Bug ID: 2339920 Summary: baekmuk-bdf-fonts: FTBFS in Fedora rawhide/f42 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: baekmuk-bdf-fonts Assignee: pwu(a)redhat.com Reporter: releng(a)fedoraproject.org QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, petersen(a)redhat.com, pwu(a)redhat.com Blocks: 2300528 (F42FTBFS) Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora baekmuk-bdf-fonts failed to build from source in Fedora rawhide/f42 https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=127934747 For details on the mass rebuild see: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_42_Mass_Rebuild Please fix baekmuk-bdf-fonts at your earliest convenience and set the bug's status to ASSIGNED when you start fixing it. If the bug remains in NEW state for 8 weeks, baekmuk-bdf-fonts will be orphaned. Before branching of Fedora 43, baekmuk-bdf-fonts will be retired, if it still fails to build. For more details on the FTBFS policy, please visit: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Fails_to_build_from_source_Fails… Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2300528 [Bug 2300528] Fedora 42 FTBFS Tracker -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2339920 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…

1 9

[Bug 2341555] New: wqy-unibit-fonts: FTBFS in Fedora rawhide/f42
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 05 Feb '25

05 Feb '25

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2341555 Bug ID: 2341555 Summary: wqy-unibit-fonts: FTBFS in Fedora rawhide/f42 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: wqy-unibit-fonts Assignee: fangqq(a)gmail.com Reporter: releng(a)fedoraproject.org QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: fangqq(a)gmail.com, fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, petersen(a)redhat.com, pwu(a)redhat.com Blocks: 2300528 (F42FTBFS) Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora wqy-unibit-fonts failed to build from source in Fedora rawhide/f42 https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=128161665 For details on the mass rebuild see: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_42_Mass_Rebuild Please fix wqy-unibit-fonts at your earliest convenience and set the bug's status to ASSIGNED when you start fixing it. If the bug remains in NEW state for 8 weeks, wqy-unibit-fonts will be orphaned. Before branching of Fedora 43, wqy-unibit-fonts will be retired, if it still fails to build. For more details on the FTBFS policy, please visit: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Fails_to_build_from_source_Fails… Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2300528 [Bug 2300528] Fedora 42 FTBFS Tracker -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2341555 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…

1 8

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

fonts-bugs February 2025