https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1532523
Fedora Admin user for bugzilla script actions <fedora-admin-xmlrpc(a)fedoraproject.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Assignee|aekoroglu(a)linux.intel.com |aekoroglu(a)gmail.com
--- Comment #15 from Fedora Admin user for bugzilla script actions <fedora-admin-xmlrpc(a)fedoraproject.org> ---
This package has changed maintainer in Fedora. Reassigning to the new
maintainer of this component.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1532523
Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2386191
Bug ID: 2386191
Summary: Bold fonts in KDE Plasma are too bold
Product: Fedora
Version: 42
Hardware: x86_64
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Component: Fonts
Keywords: Desktop
Severity: medium
Assignee: i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Reporter: joshas(a)gmail.com
QA Contact: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
After clean install of KDE Plasma Desktop, all bold fonts used in KDE
applications, like System Settings or Dolphin are too bold.
Reproducible: Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Install Fedora KDE Plasma Desktop or run live session
2. Open System Settings
3. Notice bold font used in main section titles
Actual Results:
Font is too bold, making it hard to read.
Expected Results:
Standard bold font should be used.
Additional Information:
Disabling "Noto Sans ()" font from Font Management fixes the issue. Note, that
this font has no name in the list.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2386191
Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2308744
Bug ID: 2308744
Summary: Upgrade Fira Sans to version 4.301 (post-Mozilla
involvement) and package FiraGO
Product: Fedora
Version: 40
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Component: mozilla-fira-fonts
Severity: medium
Assignee: ego.cordatus(a)gmail.com
Reporter: mateusrodcosta(a)gmail.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: admiller(a)redhat.com, ego.cordatus(a)gmail.com,
fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
From https://bboxtype.com/fira/ :
> Originally designed as a typeface for the Mozilla OS, Fira Sans has developed towards a standalone Open Font project. In 2012, we designed the firstversion of Fira in cooperation with Erik Spiekermann and Mozilla. Over the next years, Fira covered more and more languages and provided further weights and styles.
> In 2016, with version 4.2, Mozilla decided to not put effort into the project anymore and in fact quit (please note that their Git is not up to date). Since 2016, we advance the project with the help of different partners. Fira Sans 4.3 will presumably be the last version. All upcoming extensions will be based on FiraGO.
Essentially Mozilla stopped working on Fira Sans but it was kept being worked
on by bBox Type GmbH.
This might also make a opportunity to migrate to the Fira Mono version by bBox
Type GmbH and also package FiraGo which isn't packaged yet.
For more info about Fira GO vs Fira Sans:
https://bboxtype.com/downloads/Projects/FiraGO_FiraSans_180109.pdf
Migrating to the bBox Type versions might requiring renaming of the package to
drop the "mozilla" prefix, as Mozilla is not involved anymore.
Reproducible: Always
This is essentially a request to move the Fira Sans e Fira Mono fonts from the
Mozilla upstream to the bBox Type upstream.
As an extra it's also a request to separately start packaging FiraGO, an
extended version of Fira Sans with improved language support.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2308744
Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2277345
Bug ID: 2277345
Summary: NotoSansMono[wght].ttf file name causes scripts with
failglob enabled to fail
Product: Fedora
Version: 40
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Component: google-noto-fonts
Severity: medium
Assignee: tagoh(a)redhat.com
Reporter: hartsjc(a)redhat.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
petersen(a)redhat.com, pwu(a)redhat.com, tagoh(a)redhat.com
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
shopt failglob
If set, patterns which fail to match filenames during pathname expansion result
in an expansion error.
Using this feature is good practice in scripts as helps prevent scripting
mistakes; however, having file name with square brackets causes failures. And
with Fedora 40 upgrade seems
google-noto-sans-mono-vf-fonts-20240301-2.fc40.noarch has added one with:
/usr/share/fonts/google-noto-vf/NotoSansMono[wght].ttf
Reproducible: Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Causes globs that don't expand to cause errors
$ shopt -s failglob
2. Try use files from rpm as variable, and fail
$ for file in $(rpm -q --list google-noto-sans-mono-vf-fonts) ; do
[[ -f "/${file}" ]] || echo "${file}"
done
-bash: no match: /usr/share/fonts/google-noto-vf/NotoSansMono[wght].ttf
3. Note the RC
$ echo $?
1
4. Or even command line
$ rpm -qf /usr/share/fonts/google-noto-vf/NotoSansMono[wght].ttf
-bash: no match: /usr/share/fonts/google-noto-vf/NotoSansMono[wght].ttf
$ rpm -qf '/usr/share/fonts/google-noto-vf/NotoSansMono[wght].ttf'
google-noto-sans-mono-vf-fonts-20240301-2.fc40.noarch
Actual Results:
-bash: no match: /usr/share/fonts/google-noto-vf/NotoSansMono[wght].ttf
Expected Results:
no error accessing files with failglob shopt enabled
started fedora 40 upgrade, as daily script of mine fails because this file is
included in initramfs too.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2277345
Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2262410
Bug ID: 2262410
Summary: Fonts are looking wrong after 20240101 update
Product: Fedora
Version: 39
Hardware: x86_64
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Component: google-noto-fonts
Severity: medium
Assignee: tagoh(a)redhat.com
Reporter: priv.luk(a)gmail.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
petersen(a)redhat.com, pwu(a)redhat.com, tagoh(a)redhat.com
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
Fonts look improperly in multiple places, e.g. mpv or KDE file picker.
Reproducible: Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Open mpv and look at OSD fonts
Actual Results:
Fonts look wrong
Expected Results:
Fonts look properly
See https://github.com/mpv-player/mpv/issues/13396 for screenshots.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2262410
Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2332389
Bug ID: 2332389
Summary: Wrong URL http://www.gnome.org/fonts/ - for Bitstream
Vera fonts
Product: Fedora
Version: 41
Hardware: x86_64
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Component: bitstream-vera-fonts
Severity: medium
Assignee: aekoroglu(a)linux.intel.com
Reporter: v.plessky(a)gmail.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: aekoroglu(a)linux.intel.com, cz172638(a)gmail.com,
fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
gnome-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, mclasen(a)redhat.com,
nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net, pavel.lisy(a)gmail.com,
rstrode(a)redhat.com
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
When you open specified package URL (http://www.gnome.org/fonts/) in browser ->
Error:
`404: Page Not Found`
Reproducible: Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Install package `bitstream-vera-sans-fonts`
2. Open http://www.gnome.org/fonts/
3. `404: Page Not Found`
Actual Results:
http://www.gnome.org/fonts/ -> `404: Page Not Found`
Expected Results:
Valid URL for Bitstream Vera fonts
URL for fonts' web page should be also updated for packages:
- bitstream-vera-serif-fonts
- bitstream-vera-sans-mono-fonts
$ rpm -qi bitstream-vera-serif-fonts | grep URL
URL : http://www.gnome.org/fonts/
Bug URL : https://bugz.fedoraproject.org/bitstream-vera-fonts
$ rpm -qi bitstream-vera-sans-fonts | grep URL
URL : http://www.gnome.org/fonts/
Bug URL : https://bugz.fedoraproject.org/bitstream-vera-fonts
$ rpm -qi bitstream-vera-sans-mono-fonts | grep URL
URL : http://www.gnome.org/fonts/
Bug URL : https://bugz.fedoraproject.org/bitstream-vera-fonts
$ rpm -qi bitstream-vera-serif-fonts
Name : bitstream-vera-serif-fonts
Version : 1.10
Release : 52.fc41
Architecture: noarch
Install Date: Сб 14 дек 2024 14:16:37
Group : Unspecified
Size : 137572
License : Bitstream-Vera
Signature : RSA/SHA256, Ср 17 июл 2024 21:26:39, Key ID d0622462e99d6ad1
Source RPM : bitstream-vera-fonts-1.10-52.fc41.src.rpm
Build Date : Ср 17 июл 2024 21:25:51
Build Host : buildhw-a64-10.iad2.fedoraproject.org
Packager : Fedora Project
Vendor : Fedora Project
URL : http://www.gnome.org/fonts/
Bug URL : https://bugz.fedoraproject.org/bitstream-vera-fonts
Summary : Bitstream Vera Serif, a variable-width serif font family
Description :
The Vera font families are high-quality Latin typefaces donated by Bitstream.
This package consists of the Bitstream Vera Serif serif variable-width font
family.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2332389
Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…