https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2332389
Bug ID: 2332389
Summary: Wrong URL http://www.gnome.org/fonts/ - for Bitstream
Vera fonts
Product: Fedora
Version: 41
Hardware: x86_64
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Component: bitstream-vera-fonts
Severity: medium
Assignee: aekoroglu(a)linux.intel.com
Reporter: v.plessky(a)gmail.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: aekoroglu(a)linux.intel.com, cz172638(a)gmail.com,
fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
gnome-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, mclasen(a)redhat.com,
nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net, pavel.lisy(a)gmail.com,
rstrode(a)redhat.com
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
When you open specified package URL (http://www.gnome.org/fonts/) in browser ->
Error:
`404: Page Not Found`
Reproducible: Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Install package `bitstream-vera-sans-fonts`
2. Open http://www.gnome.org/fonts/
3. `404: Page Not Found`
Actual Results:
http://www.gnome.org/fonts/ -> `404: Page Not Found`
Expected Results:
Valid URL for Bitstream Vera fonts
URL for fonts' web page should be also updated for packages:
- bitstream-vera-serif-fonts
- bitstream-vera-sans-mono-fonts
$ rpm -qi bitstream-vera-serif-fonts | grep URL
URL : http://www.gnome.org/fonts/
Bug URL : https://bugz.fedoraproject.org/bitstream-vera-fonts
$ rpm -qi bitstream-vera-sans-fonts | grep URL
URL : http://www.gnome.org/fonts/
Bug URL : https://bugz.fedoraproject.org/bitstream-vera-fonts
$ rpm -qi bitstream-vera-sans-mono-fonts | grep URL
URL : http://www.gnome.org/fonts/
Bug URL : https://bugz.fedoraproject.org/bitstream-vera-fonts
$ rpm -qi bitstream-vera-serif-fonts
Name : bitstream-vera-serif-fonts
Version : 1.10
Release : 52.fc41
Architecture: noarch
Install Date: Сб 14 дек 2024 14:16:37
Group : Unspecified
Size : 137572
License : Bitstream-Vera
Signature : RSA/SHA256, Ср 17 июл 2024 21:26:39, Key ID d0622462e99d6ad1
Source RPM : bitstream-vera-fonts-1.10-52.fc41.src.rpm
Build Date : Ср 17 июл 2024 21:25:51
Build Host : buildhw-a64-10.iad2.fedoraproject.org
Packager : Fedora Project
Vendor : Fedora Project
URL : http://www.gnome.org/fonts/
Bug URL : https://bugz.fedoraproject.org/bitstream-vera-fonts
Summary : Bitstream Vera Serif, a variable-width serif font family
Description :
The Vera font families are high-quality Latin typefaces donated by Bitstream.
This package consists of the Bitstream Vera Serif serif variable-width font
family.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2332389
Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2393704
Bug ID: 2393704
Summary: freetype-2.14.0 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: freetype
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee: mkasik(a)redhat.com
Reporter: upstream-release-monitoring(a)fedoraproject.org
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: ajax(a)redhat.com, fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
mclasen(a)redhat.com, mkasik(a)redhat.com,
rstrode(a)redhat.com, suraj.ghimire7(a)gmail.com
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
Releases retrieved: 2.14.0
Upstream release that is considered latest: 2.14.0
Current version/release in rawhide: 2.13.3-3.fc43
URL: https://www.freetype.org/
Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a
stable branch: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/
More information about the service that created this bug can be found at:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/package-maintainers/Upstream_Release_M…
Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging
changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your
responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still
correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added
upstream.
Based on the information from Anitya:
https://release-monitoring.org/project/854/
To change the monitoring settings for the project, please visit:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/freetype
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2393704
Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2389100
Bug ID: 2389100
Summary: U+FE0E (text-style selector) ignored when COLRv1 emoji
fonts are present
Product: Fedora
Version: 43
URL: https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/pango/-/issues/866
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Component: pango
Keywords: Desktop, i18n
Severity: medium
Assignee: pwu(a)redhat.com
Reporter: mfabian(a)redhat.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
gnome-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, mclasen(a)redhat.com,
pwu(a)redhat.com, rhughes(a)redhat.com,
rstrode(a)redhat.com, tagoh(a)redhat.com
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
See: U+FE0E (text-style selector) ignored when COLRv1 emoji fonts are present
When a COLRv1 emoji font (e.g., Noto-COLRv1.ttf) is installed, the Unicode
variation selector U+FE0E (text-style) is ignored, and emoji are always
rendered in color. This breaks expected behavior, as U+FE0E should force
monochrome rendering.
Steps to reproduce:
On a system with Noto-COLRv1.ttf (e.g., Fedora Rawhide), run:
pango-view --font="sans" test.txt
with the test.txt attached here: test.txt (this file contains: 🚀 🚀︎ (U+1F680
U+1F680 U+FE0E))
Expected output shown by pango-view: One colored rocket, one monochrome rocket.
Actual output: two colored rockets.
If one tries the same on Fedora 42 with default fonts installed, i.e. no font
with a COLR table, it works as expected.
/usr/share/fonts/google-noto-color-emoji-fonts/Noto-COLRv1.ttf does not have
U+FE0E according to fontconfig:
mfabian@f42:~
$ fc-list :charset=1f680,fe0e
/usr/share/fonts/gdouros-symbola/Symbola.ttf: Symbola:style=Regular
/usr/share/fonts/google-noto-emoji-fonts/NotoEmoji-Regular.ttf: Noto
Emoji:style=Regular
mfabian@f42:~
$ fc-list :charset=1f680
/usr/share/fonts/twemoji/Twemoji.ttf: Twemoji:style=Regular
/usr/share/fonts/google-noto-color-emoji-fonts/NotoColorEmoji.ttf: Noto Color
Emoji:style=Regular
/usr/share/fonts/hfg-gmuend-openmoji-black-fonts/OpenMoji-black-glyf.ttf:
OpenMoji Black,OpenMoji Black:style=Regular,Regular
/usr/share/fonts/gdouros-symbola/Symbola.ttf: Symbola:style=Regular
/usr/share/fonts/google-noto-emoji-fonts/NotoEmoji-Regular.ttf: Noto
Emoji:style=Regular
/usr/share/fonts/hfg-gmuend-openmoji-color-fonts/OpenMoji-color-glyf_colr_1.ttf:
OpenMoji Color,OpenMoji Color:style=Regular,
Regular
mfabian@f42:~
$
and it is not used to render U+1F680 U+FE0E, instead
/usr/share/fonts/google-noto-emoji-fonts/NotoEmoji-Regular.ttf is used which
has both U+1F680 and U+FE0E.
Reproducible: Always
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2389100
Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…