fonts-bugs February 2026

fonts-bugs@lists.fedoraproject.org

1 participants
11 discussions

[Bug 1822847] Review Request: vl-gothic-fonts - Japanese TrueType fonts
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 22 Feb '26

22 Feb '26

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1822847 miky678 <mjhon9911(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mjhon9911(a)gmail.com --- Comment #21 from miky678 <mjhon9911(a)gmail.com> --- I’ve been following this Bugzilla thread and it’s interesting how small character or encoding issues can create unexpected behavior in systems. Unicode handling is often overlooked until something breaks. For anyone testing display consistency across platforms, especially with styled usernames or special symbols, tools like https://thestylishname.com/ can actually help generate different Unicode variations to reproduce rendering quirks. It’s a simple way to see how various environments interpret decorative text. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1822847 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…

1 0

[Bug 2440529] New: Outdated freetype.spec
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 19 Feb '26

19 Feb '26

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2440529 Bug ID: 2440529 Summary: Outdated freetype.spec Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All URL: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/freetype/blob/rawhi de/f/freetype.spec#_114 OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: freetype Severity: low Assignee: mkasik(a)redhat.com Reporter: apodtele(a)gmail.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: ajax(a)redhat.com, fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, mclasen(a)redhat.com, mkasik(a)redhat.com, rstrode(a)redhat.com, suraj.ghimire7(a)gmail.com Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Some parts of freetype.spec are very outdated. For example, 1. # Convert FTL.txt and example3.cpp to UTF-8 This has been fixed many years ago. 2. Please add ttdebug and remove "additional" ftdemos. The "additional" demos are not worth much, unmaintained, and outdated. It makes sense to limit yourself to 12 programs with man pages. I am attaching a patch which should help. Reproducible: Always -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2440529 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…

1 2

[Bug 2431892] New: Provide a meta-package that prioritizes VFs
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 12 Feb '26

12 Feb '26

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2431892 Bug ID: 2431892 Summary: Provide a meta-package that prioritizes VFs Product: Fedora Version: 43 Hardware: x86_64 OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: google-noto-fonts Severity: medium Assignee: tagoh(a)redhat.com Reporter: EpicTux123(a)proton.me QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, petersen(a)redhat.com, pwu(a)redhat.com, tagoh(a)redhat.com Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Hi there. Currently, the "google-noto-fonts-all" meta-package installs many font duplicates. Fedora seems to prever VF variants ( https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/VariableNotoFonts , https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Noto_CJK_Variable_Fonts ), but the meta-package installs both Static and VF variants of the same fonts. Example from command "dnf repoquery --requires google-noto-fonts-all": ------------------------------------------------------ google-noto-serif-hebrew-fonts = 20250901-1.fc43 google-noto-serif-hebrew-fonts = 20251101-2.fc43 google-noto-serif-hebrew-vf-fonts = 20250901-1.fc43 google-noto-serif-hebrew-vf-fonts = 20251101-2.fc43 ------------------------------------------------------ I would like to request the creation of a meta-package that prioritizes VF variants and don't install their equivalent duplicates in Static variant. For example, the meta-package would install Hebrew VF fonts, but not Hebrew Static fonts. This eliminates the duplicates, while still keeping the Static fonts in a meta-package for the fonts that don't have VF variants. Additional note: the current "google-noto-fonts-all" should probably install the other "-all" meta-packages as well, since it includes all of their deps as well. Thanks. Reproducible: Always -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2431892 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…

1 5

[Bug 2382666] New: fontawesome-fonts-7.0.0 is available
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 10 Feb '26

10 Feb '26

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2382666 Bug ID: 2382666 Summary: fontawesome-fonts-7.0.0 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: fontawesome-fonts Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee: loganjerry(a)gmail.com Reporter: upstream-release-monitoring(a)fedoraproject.org QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: davide(a)cavalca.name, fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, loganjerry(a)gmail.com, mrunge(a)redhat.com Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Releases retrieved: 7.0.0 Upstream release that is considered latest: 7.0.0 Current version/release in rawhide: 6.7.2-2.fc42 URL: http://fontawesome.io Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/ More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/package-maintainers/Upstream_Release_M… Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added upstream. Based on the information from Anitya: https://release-monitoring.org/project/826/ To change the monitoring settings for the project, please visit: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/fontawesome-fonts -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2382666 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…

1 12

[Bug 2437588] New: libfontenc-1.1.9 is available
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 08 Feb '26

08 Feb '26

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2437588 Bug ID: 2437588 Summary: libfontenc-1.1.9 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: libfontenc Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee: jexposit(a)redhat.com Reporter: upstream-release-monitoring(a)fedoraproject.org QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: ajax(a)redhat.com, btissoir(a)redhat.com, fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, jexposit(a)redhat.com, rhughes(a)redhat.com, rstrode(a)redhat.com Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Releases retrieved: 1.1.9 Upstream release that is considered latest: 1.1.9 Current version/release in rawhide: 1.1.8-5.fc44 URL: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/xorg/lib/libfontenc Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/ More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/package-maintainers/Upstream_Release_M… Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added upstream. Based on the information from Anitya: https://release-monitoring.org/project/1613/ To change the monitoring settings for the project, please visit: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/libfontenc -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2437588 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…

1 2

[Bug 2426593] New: CVE-2025-15279 fontforge: FontForge GUtils BMP File Parsing Heap-based Buffer Overflow Remote Code Execution Vulnerability [fedora-42]
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 01 Feb '26

01 Feb '26

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2426593 Bug ID: 2426593 Summary: CVE-2025-15279 fontforge: FontForge GUtils BMP File Parsing Heap-based Buffer Overflow Remote Code Execution Vulnerability [fedora-42] Product: Fedora Version: 42 Status: NEW Whiteboard: {"flaws": ["cab9b630-800b-43be-8e4e-d2a23173d42e"]} Component: fontforge Keywords: Security, SecurityTracking Severity: high Priority: high Assignee: pnemade(a)redhat.com Reporter: saroy(a)redhat.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, kevin(a)scrye.com, pnemade(a)redhat.com Blocks: 2426421 Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Disclaimer: Community trackers are created by Red Hat Product Security team on a best effort basis. Package maintainers are required to ascertain if the flaw indeed affects their package, before starting the update process. The following link provides references to all essential vulnerability management information. If something is wrong or missing, please contact a member of PSIRT. https://spaces.redhat.com/display/PRODSEC/Vulnerability+Management+-+Essent… -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2426593 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…

1 3

[Bug 2426589] New: CVE-2025-15275 fontforge: FontForge SFD File Parsing Heap-based Buffer Overflow Remote Code Execution Vulnerability [fedora-42]
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 01 Feb '26

01 Feb '26

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2426589 Bug ID: 2426589 Summary: CVE-2025-15275 fontforge: FontForge SFD File Parsing Heap-based Buffer Overflow Remote Code Execution Vulnerability [fedora-42] Product: Fedora Version: 42 Status: NEW Whiteboard: {"flaws": ["5af30362-e9b2-494f-8f80-baaa55c5a07e"]} Component: fontforge Keywords: Security, SecurityTracking Severity: high Priority: high Assignee: pnemade(a)redhat.com Reporter: saroy(a)redhat.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, kevin(a)scrye.com, pnemade(a)redhat.com Blocks: 2426429 Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Disclaimer: Community trackers are created by Red Hat Product Security team on a best effort basis. Package maintainers are required to ascertain if the flaw indeed affects their package, before starting the update process. The following link provides references to all essential vulnerability management information. If something is wrong or missing, please contact a member of PSIRT. https://spaces.redhat.com/display/PRODSEC/Vulnerability+Management+-+Essent… -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2426589 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…

1 3

[Bug 2426577] New: CVE-2025-15269 fontforge: FontForge SFD File Parsing Use-After-Free Remote Code Execution Vulnerability [fedora-42]
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 01 Feb '26

01 Feb '26

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2426577 Bug ID: 2426577 Summary: CVE-2025-15269 fontforge: FontForge SFD File Parsing Use-After-Free Remote Code Execution Vulnerability [fedora-42] Product: Fedora Version: 42 Status: NEW Whiteboard: {"flaws": ["0863e5e2-7597-4ea2-8788-270434bc8584"]} Component: fontforge Keywords: Security, SecurityTracking Severity: high Priority: high Assignee: pnemade(a)redhat.com Reporter: saroy(a)redhat.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, kevin(a)scrye.com, pnemade(a)redhat.com Blocks: 2426423 Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Disclaimer: Community trackers are created by Red Hat Product Security team on a best effort basis. Package maintainers are required to ascertain if the flaw indeed affects their package, before starting the update process. The following link provides references to all essential vulnerability management information. If something is wrong or missing, please contact a member of PSIRT. https://spaces.redhat.com/display/PRODSEC/Vulnerability+Management+-+Essent… -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2426577 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…

1 3

[Bug 2426597] New: CVE-2025-15279 fontforge: FontForge GUtils BMP File Parsing Heap-based Buffer Overflow Remote Code Execution Vulnerability [fedora-43]
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 01 Feb '26

01 Feb '26

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2426597 Bug ID: 2426597 Summary: CVE-2025-15279 fontforge: FontForge GUtils BMP File Parsing Heap-based Buffer Overflow Remote Code Execution Vulnerability [fedora-43] Product: Fedora Version: 43 Status: NEW Whiteboard: {"flaws": ["cab9b630-800b-43be-8e4e-d2a23173d42e"]} Component: fontforge Keywords: Security, SecurityTracking Severity: high Priority: high Assignee: pnemade(a)redhat.com Reporter: saroy(a)redhat.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, kevin(a)scrye.com, pnemade(a)redhat.com Blocks: 2426421 Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Disclaimer: Community trackers are created by Red Hat Product Security team on a best effort basis. Package maintainers are required to ascertain if the flaw indeed affects their package, before starting the update process. The following link provides references to all essential vulnerability management information. If something is wrong or missing, please contact a member of PSIRT. https://spaces.redhat.com/display/PRODSEC/Vulnerability+Management+-+Essent… -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2426597 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…

1 3

[Bug 2426591] New: CVE-2025-15275 fontforge: FontForge SFD File Parsing Heap-based Buffer Overflow Remote Code Execution Vulnerability [fedora-43]
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 01 Feb '26

01 Feb '26

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2426591 Bug ID: 2426591 Summary: CVE-2025-15275 fontforge: FontForge SFD File Parsing Heap-based Buffer Overflow Remote Code Execution Vulnerability [fedora-43] Product: Fedora Version: 43 Status: NEW Whiteboard: {"flaws": ["5af30362-e9b2-494f-8f80-baaa55c5a07e"]} Component: fontforge Keywords: Security, SecurityTracking Severity: high Priority: high Assignee: pnemade(a)redhat.com Reporter: saroy(a)redhat.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, kevin(a)scrye.com, pnemade(a)redhat.com Blocks: 2426429 Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Disclaimer: Community trackers are created by Red Hat Product Security team on a best effort basis. Package maintainers are required to ascertain if the flaw indeed affects their package, before starting the update process. The following link provides references to all essential vulnerability management information. If something is wrong or missing, please contact a member of PSIRT. https://spaces.redhat.com/display/PRODSEC/Vulnerability+Management+-+Essent… -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2426591 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…

1 3

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

fonts-bugs February 2026