Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525872
--- Comment #7 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mailhot@laposte.net 2009-09-26 12:13:04 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1)
As for the font bugs, it would be great if these bug reports included a list of the offending files in the specific package
Well for reports like http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-fonts-list/2009-September/msg00005.htm...
it just can't be done there is too much data collected, I tried to post it the first time and the lists refused to let the attached data pass (too big)
However it is always possible to ask me in PM for the data, or to run the test yourself. It takes a simple bog-standard repo as argument, so if you don't want to wait for a full rawhide run, just put the packages you're interested in a dir, run createrepo on it, and point repo-font-audit there
(the current version only understands http:// and ftp:// URIs, I'm testing a version that works with file:// too. Will probably publish it today)