Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Hard to read arabic fonts
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439421
fedora-triage-list(a)redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Version|rawhide |9
petersen(a)redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |eng-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com,
| |petersen(a)redhat.com
------- Additional Comments From fedora-triage-list(a)redhat.com 2008-05-14 04:22 EST
-------
Changing version to '9' as part of upcoming Fedora 9 GA.
More information and reason for this action is here:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping
------- Additional Comments From petersen(a)redhat.com 2008-07-11 03:46 EST -------
(In reply to comment #9)
So I removed one package then the other it looks like I was
complaining about
kacst-fonts, paktype-fonts is a little better since it is not bold but it is
still not as good as the font used in f7. That is the font used in standard
print (newspapers, books, etc)
Hmm, I wonder what font you miss from F7?
I am not aware of any changes for Arabic since then, except that the fonts
were moved to separate packages are Rahul explained.
Perhaps you could try fonts-arabic from f7 again and see if that makes a difference:
since the paths to the fonts changed and might potentially have affected
the priorities.
Should we make kacst-fonts optional for Arabic?
--
Configure bugmail:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.