Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439421
Summary: Hard to read arabic fonts Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: fonts-arabic AssignedTo: rbhalera@redhat.com ReportedBy: swagiaal@redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa@fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
The arabic font in f8 is very hard to read, I have reinstalled the package from f7.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Hard to read arabic fonts
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439421
------- Additional Comments From swagiaal@redhat.com 2008-03-28 13:13 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=299499) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=299499&action=view) arabic font in f8
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Hard to read arabic fonts
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439421
------- Additional Comments From swagiaal@redhat.com 2008-03-28 13:13 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=299500) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=299500&action=view) arabic font in f7
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Hard to read arabic fonts
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439421
------- Additional Comments From nicolas.mailhot@laposte.net 2008-03-28 15:40 EST ------- You'll be happy to learn that the F9 default font is stated to change to DejaVu (full), which includes arabic, and will take precedence over whatever we used before. However I suspect that you may not like it much either – its design was constrained by lack of support for OpenType BASE (http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=346419)
Users being so sensitive to font choices, I don't think we can change font defaults of a released distribution, and it's getting awfully late to do anything but tweaking for F9 (fixing a few glyphs right and left). Please test and report problems early in release cycles if you're not satisfied with our choices of defaults. (or propose changes to apply to Fedora Devel at F9 release time ie the start of the F10 cycle)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Hard to read arabic fonts
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439421
------- Additional Comments From rbhalera@redhat.com 2008-03-31 09:31 EST ------- sami, There are several fonts included for arabic that come from two parent groups, paktype and kasct.Can you please provide the name of the particular fonts selected in both the cases?
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Hard to read arabic fonts
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439421
------- Additional Comments From swagiaal@redhat.com 2008-03-31 11:57 EST -------
Can you please provide the name of the particular fonts selected in both the cases?
How do I find out what it is ?
btw i tried this:
$rpm -q fonts-arabic fonts-arabic-2.1-2.fc8
$rpm -ql fonts-arabic (contains no files)
Thats a little strange isnt it ?
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Hard to read arabic fonts
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439421
------- Additional Comments From swagiaal@redhat.com 2008-03-31 13:34 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3)
You'll be happy to learn that the F9 default font is stated to change to DejaVu
I tried rawhide and it looks the same as f8
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Hard to read arabic fonts
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439421
------- Additional Comments From rbhalera@redhat.com 2008-04-01 00:58 EST -------
$rpm -ql fonts-arabic (contains no files)
Thats a little strange isnt it ?
That is because, fonts-arabic package has been deprecated since f8. It was split in two packages, paktype-fonts and kacst-fonts. Now fonts-arabic is only a metapackage that installs these two packages.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Hard to read arabic fonts
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439421
------- Additional Comments From nicolas.mailhot@laposte.net 2008-04-01 08:22 EST ------- Also the fonts we use for arabic as not necessarily pulled by fonts-arabic (it's only there as compatibility for people who used to have it installed).
In the future fonts needed to support a particular language will be declared in the comps group associated with this language (for example arabic-support)
http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewcvs/comps/
This is what is supposed to be exposed to end users in the installers/software updaters.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Hard to read arabic fonts
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439421
------- Additional Comments From swagiaal@redhat.com 2008-04-01 10:22 EST -------
That is because, fonts-arabic package has been deprecated since f8. It was split in two packages, paktype-fonts and kacst-fonts. Now fonts-arabic is only a metapackage that installs these two packages.
Ah I see.
So I removed one package then the other it looks like I was complaining about kacst-fonts, paktype-fonts is a little better since it is not bold but it is still not as good as the font used in f7. That is the font used in standard print (newspapers, books, etc)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Hard to read arabic fonts
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439421
------- Additional Comments From swagiaal@redhat.com 2008-04-01 10:24 EST -------
In the future fonts needed to support a particular language will be declared in the comps group associated with this language (for example arabic-support)
http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewcvs/comps/
This is what is supposed to be exposed to end users in the installers/software updaters.
Nice. That would be much better than yum install '*arabic*' which always cause problems for me.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Hard to read arabic fonts
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439421
------- Additional Comments From rbhalera@redhat.com 2008-04-02 07:15 EST ------- May be kacst-book is the font that you are looking for. May be there is a problem with the font selection done by fontconfig. Anyway since this bug is not indeed a fonts-arabic bug and problem appears with fontconfig, I am reassigning it to fontconfig.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Hard to read arabic fonts
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439421
rbhalera@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Component|fonts-arabic |fontconfig
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Hard to read arabic fonts
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439421
rbhalera@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|rbhalera@redhat.com |besfahbo@redhat.com
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Hard to read arabic fonts
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439421
fedora-triage-list@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|rawhide |9
petersen@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |eng-i18n-bugs@redhat.com, | |petersen@redhat.com
------- Additional Comments From fedora-triage-list@redhat.com 2008-05-14 04:22 EST ------- Changing version to '9' as part of upcoming Fedora 9 GA. More information and reason for this action is here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping
------- Additional Comments From petersen@redhat.com 2008-07-11 03:46 EST ------- (In reply to comment #9)
So I removed one package then the other it looks like I was complaining about kacst-fonts, paktype-fonts is a little better since it is not bold but it is still not as good as the font used in f7. That is the font used in standard print (newspapers, books, etc)
Hmm, I wonder what font you miss from F7? I am not aware of any changes for Arabic since then, except that the fonts were moved to separate packages are Rahul explained.
Perhaps you could try fonts-arabic from f7 again and see if that makes a difference: since the paths to the fonts changed and might potentially have affected the priorities.
Should we make kacst-fonts optional for Arabic?
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439421
Tony Fu tfu@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|eng-i18n-bugs@redhat.com |fedora-i18n-bugs@redhat.com
--- Comment #14 from Tony Fu tfu@redhat.com 2008-09-09 23:08:19 EDT --- requested by Jens Petersen (#27995)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439421
--- Comment #15 from Jens Petersen petersen@redhat.com 2008-09-10 22:39:36 EDT --- Someone is planning to submit Arabeyes fonts to fedora which may be an improvement?
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439421
--- Comment #16 from sami swagiaal@redhat.com 2009-02-24 12:51:03 EDT --- Hey guys,
Any updates on this ? This is still present in F10
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439421
Jens Petersen petersen@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|9 |10
--- Comment #17 from Jens Petersen petersen@redhat.com 2009-02-25 01:46:32 EDT --- As usual no word from Behdad...
Sami, what font you want to see/use by default? Does dejavu workforyou?
What is your testcase?
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439421
--- Comment #18 from Jens Petersen petersen@redhat.com 2009-02-25 01:56:45 EDT --- Please include the output of "rpm -qa *fonts* | sort"
eg http://ar.wikipedia.org/ looks ok to me on a default F10 and rawhide installs currently.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439421
--- Comment #19 from sami swagiaal@redhat.com 2009-02-25 11:16:57 EDT --- Yes, I tried it on another f10 and it looked fine. I found that I had paktype-fonts-2.0-2.fc8.noarch installed removed it and the page looked fine. I installed dejavu and it looks even better.
I must have been carrying old settings since I did an upgrade
Thanks
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439421
Jens Petersen petersen@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE
fonts-bugs@lists.fedoraproject.org