[Bug 525870] New: The Java plugin does not report available fonts accurately

[Bug 671122] pango: Heap-based...

[google-lato-fonts/f13/master]...

Red Hat Bugzilla

Saturday, 26 September 2009 Sat, 26 Sep '09

8:32 a.m.

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: The Java plugin does not report available fonts accurately https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525870 Summary: The Java plugin does not report available fonts accurately Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: java-1.6.0-openjdk AssignedTo: langel(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: dbhole(a)redhat.com, mark(a)klomp.org, langel(a)redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com, lkundrak(a)v3.sk Blocks: 473302 Classification: Fedora Description of problem: The Java plugin does not report available fonts accurately. Samplers such as http://www.codestyle.org/css/font-family/sampler-Unix.shtml collect incomplete info Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): java-1.6.0-openjdk-plugin-1.6.0.0-31.b16.fc12.x86_64 How reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. Get a F11 or rawhide system 2. Install our fonts # yum -y install $(repoquery --whatprovides "font(*)") 3. List them $ fc-list : family |sort 4. Open http://www.codestyle.org/css/font-family/sampler-Unix.shtml 5. Let the applet run, check its result Actual results: The java-detected font list is incomplete (for example it's missing STIX) and does not use the same names at fontconfig Expected results: The same list in both cases Additional info: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

Show replies by date

Red Hat Bugzilla

Friday, 2 July Fri, 2 Jul

10:40 a.m.

New subject: [Bug 525870] The Java plugin does not report available fonts accurately

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525870 Omair Majid <omajid(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |omajid(a)redhat.com AssignedTo|rruss(a)redhat.com |omajid(a)redhat.com --- Comment #3 from Omair Majid <omajid(a)redhat.com> 2010-07-02 11:39:58 EDT --- Just some thoughts about missing fonts: The Java runtime searches /usr/share/fonts/stix (and other folders) but does not find any type of fonts that it recognizes. The JDK source code seems to indicate that only X11 native fonts, FreeType and Postscript Type 1 fonts are supported or recognized. This would explain why fonts like STIX (an OpenType font) are not recognized. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

Red Hat Bugzilla

12:04 p.m.

New subject: [Bug 525870] The Java plugin does not report available fonts accurately

Red Hat Bugzilla

Tuesday, 16 November Tue, 16 Nov

12:25 p.m.

New subject: [Bug 525870] The Java plugin does not report available fonts accurately

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525870 --- Comment #5 from Omair Majid <omajid(a)redhat.com> 2010-11-16 13:25:10 EST --- Support for opentype fonts has been added in OpenJDK6. See commits: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk6/jdk6/jdk/rev/b577c70564b8 http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk6/jdk6/jdk/rev/acb763ebef95 These should be part of the next OpenJDK6 source drop. IcedTea6 1.10 should include these fixes. Note that even with this patch, the fonts listed are not identical. OpenJDK does not support X11 bitmap fonts. There is also a slight naming difference - OpenJDK names the fonts using just the English parts of the font name shown by fc-list. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

Red Hat Bugzilla

12:52 p.m.

New subject: [Bug 525870] The Java plugin does not report available fonts accurately

...

Support for opentype fonts has been added in OpenJDK6. See commits: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk6/jdk6/jdk/rev/b577c70564b8 http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk6/jdk6/jdk/rev/acb763ebef95 These should be part of the next OpenJDK6 source drop. IcedTea6 1.10 should include these fixes.

Thanks!

...

Note that even with this patch, the fonts listed are not identical. OpenJDK does not support X11 bitmap fonts.

That's a feature

...

There is also a slight naming difference - OpenJDK names the fonts using just the English parts of the font name shown by fc-list.

This part won't work. Not all fonts have English names (it can be trivially be checked by running repo-font-audit from fontpackages-tools on a Fedora, RHEL or Centos repository, this is one of its checks) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

Red Hat Bugzilla

2:55 p.m.

New subject: [Bug 525870] The Java plugin does not report available fonts accurately

...

(In reply to comment #5) > Note that even with this patch, the fonts listed are not identical. OpenJDK > does not support X11 bitmap fonts. That's a feature

Heh. :)

...

> There is also a slight naming difference - > OpenJDK names the fonts using just the English parts of the font name shown by > fc-list. This part won't work. Not all fonts have English names (it can be trivially be checked by running repo-font-audit from fontpackages-tools on a Fedora, RHEL or Centos repository, this is one of its checks)

Hm.. So I downloaded all packages in the group Font and ran this tool against a new repo containing those packages. I still have no clue what I am looking for :/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

Red Hat Bugzilla

Wednesday, 17 November Wed, 17 Nov

1:16 a.m.

New subject: [Bug 525870] The Java plugin does not report available fonts accurately

Red Hat Bugzilla

Friday, 19 November Fri, 19 Nov

8:51 a.m.

New subject: [Bug 525870] The Java plugin does not report available fonts accurately

...

See the last part of http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-fonts-list/2009-June/msg00001.html for example (this is an *old* repo-font-audit report, many font packages have been added since)

Are you talking about "packages with localized metadata but no English variant" section? I tried out installing sazanami-gothic-fonts (which my local repo-font-audio report also pointed out) and fc-list shows "Sazanami Gothic,さざなみゴシック" (it still has an english name). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

Red Hat Bugzilla

8:54 a.m.

New subject: [Bug 525870] The Java plugin does not report available fonts accurately

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525870 --- Comment #10 from Omair Majid <omajid(a)redhat.com> 2010-11-19 09:54:24 EST --- Update: I just installed every single fedora (13) font package. 'fc-list : family' does not show me any fonts without an English name. I must be missing something. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

Red Hat Bugzilla

12:53 p.m.

New subject: [Bug 525870] The Java plugin does not report available fonts accurately

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525870 --- Comment #11 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net> 2010-11-19 13:53:58 EST --- fc-list :family is a summary. To really see what's in a font file you need to use fc-query $ fc-query /usr/share/fonts/sazanami/gothic/sazanami-gothic.ttf Pattern has 20 elts (size 32) family: "Sazanami Gothic"(s) "さざなみゴシック"(s) familylang: "ar"(s) "ja"(s) So sazanami does not have an English name, it has an Arabic and Japanese name $ fc-query /usr/share/fonts/gfs-theokritos/GFSTheokritos.otf Pattern has 19 elts (size 32) family: "GFS Theokritos"(s) familylang: "el"(s) And this one only declares a Greek name It's pure luck than in both cases the non-English name was filled with an English string, you can't rely on it for a general-purpose java engine Also when you filter the names declared by fonts, that means all the CSS-y dialects people use nowadays can fail (because they can reference one of the names you've filtered out). IIRC there have been efforts to expose the Postscript font name in fontconfig recently in addition to the TrueType one, because some pdf generators are fond of using this font name in their font references, so software that filters those names out can not display the resulting files correctly. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

Red Hat Bugzilla

Monday, 22 November Mon, 22 Nov

5:21 p.m.

New subject: [Bug 525870] The Java plugin does not report available fonts accurately

...

fc-list :family is a summary. To really see what's in a font file you need to use fc-query $ fc-query /usr/share/fonts/sazanami/gothic/sazanami-gothic.ttf Pattern has 20 elts (size 32) family: "Sazanami Gothic"(s) "さざなみゴシック"(s) familylang: "ar"(s) "ja"(s) So sazanami does not have an English name, it has an Arabic and Japanese name $ fc-query /usr/share/fonts/gfs-theokritos/GFSTheokritos.otf Pattern has 19 elts (size 32) family: "GFS Theokritos"(s) familylang: "el"(s) And this one only declares a Greek name It's pure luck than in both cases the non-English name was filled with an English string, you can't rely on it for a general-purpose java engine

Ah, thanks for the explanation. I dug into the OpenJDK source code to find that Java picks one name for every font. The name is either the the last english name in the font file or (if there is no english name) the first non-english name. So Java should not have problems handing the actual fonts, but it may not associate the right localized name with the font (based on your localization settings). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

Red Hat Bugzilla

Tuesday, 18 January Tue, 18 Jan

10:16 a.m.

New subject: [Bug 525870] The Java plugin does not report available fonts accurately

Red Hat Bugzilla

10:17 a.m.

New subject: [Bug 525870] The Java plugin does not report available fonts accurately

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525870 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> 2011-01-18 11:17:10 EST --- java-1.6.0-openjdk-1.6.0.0-48.1.8.4.fc13 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 13. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/java-1.6.0-openjdk-1.6.0.0-48.1.8... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

Red Hat Bugzilla

10:25 a.m.

New subject: [Bug 525870] The Java plugin does not report available fonts accurately

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525870 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> 2011-01-18 11:25:43 EST --- java-1.6.0-openjdk-1.6.0.0-50.1.9.4.fc14 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 14. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/java-1.6.0-openjdk-1.6.0.0-50.1.9... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

Red Hat Bugzilla

10:27 a.m.

New subject: [Bug 525870] The Java plugin does not report available fonts accurately

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525870 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> 2011-01-18 11:27:21 EST --- java-1.6.0-openjdk-1.6.0.0-48.1.8.4.fc13 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 13. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/java-1.6.0-openjdk-1.6.0.0-48.1.8... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

Red Hat Bugzilla

3:29 p.m.

New subject: [Bug 525870] The Java plugin does not report available fonts accurately

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525870 Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |ON_QA --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> 2011-01-18 16:29:43 EST --- java-1.6.0-openjdk-1.6.0.0-48.1.8.4.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update java-1.6.0-openjdk'. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/java-1.6.0-openjdk-1.6.0.0-48.1.8... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

Red Hat Bugzilla

Wednesday, 19 January Wed, 19 Jan

3:05 p.m.

New subject: [Bug 525870] The Java plugin does not report available fonts accurately

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525870 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> 2011-01-19 16:05:36 EST --- java-1.6.0-openjdk-1.6.0.0-50.1.9.4.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

Red Hat Bugzilla

3:06 p.m.

New subject: [Bug 525870] The Java plugin does not report available fonts accurately

Red Hat Bugzilla

3:09 p.m.

New subject: [Bug 525870] The Java plugin does not report available fonts accurately

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525870 --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> 2011-01-19 16:09:18 EST --- java-1.6.0-openjdk-1.6.0.0-48.1.8.4.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

Red Hat Bugzilla

3:09 p.m.

New subject: [Bug 525870] The Java plugin does not report available fonts accurately

4845

days inactive

5325

days old

fonts-bugs@lists.fedoraproject.org

Manage subscription

19 comments

1 participants

tags (0)

participants (1)

Red Hat Bugzilla

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

[Bug 525870] New: The Java plugin does not report available fonts accurately