[Bug 1774474] New: Missing some coverage in certain variants

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1774474

Bug ID: 1774474
           Summary: Missing some coverage in certain variants
           Product: Fedora
           Version: rawhide
            Status: NEW
         Component: dejavu-fonts
          Severity: low
          Assignee: [e-mail]
          Reporter: [e-mail]
        QA Contact: [e-mail]
                CC: [e-mail],
                    [e-mail], [e-mail],
                    [e-mail]
  Target Milestone: ---
    Classification: Fedora

Description of problem:
I'm expecting to see same glyph coverage to all variants available in the
package but apparently not. this is just a result running some test cases with
fc-validate against languages which is expectedly or unexpectedly supposed to
assign dejavu as a default font for.

See logs stored in the following link for more details. that demonstrates this
issue.

https://jenkins-continuous-infra.apps.ci.centos.org/blue/rest/organizations/...

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
2.37-2.fc31

How reproducible:
always

Steps to Reproduce:
1.fc-validate -l <lang> /path/to/fonts
2.
3.

Actual results:
(One of) snippet from logs:
[2019-11-19T14:20:10.928Z]     RESULT: PASS:
/usr/share/fonts/dejavu/DejaVuSans-Bold.ttf satisfy ab language coverage.
[2019-11-19T14:20:10.928Z]     RESULT: PASS:
/usr/share/fonts/dejavu/DejaVuSans.ttf satisfy ab language coverage.
[2019-11-19T14:20:10.928Z]     RESULT: PASS:
/usr/share/fonts/dejavu/DejaVuSansCondensed-Oblique.ttf satisfy ab language
coverage.
[2019-11-19T14:20:10.928Z]     RESULT: PASS:
/usr/share/fonts/dejavu/DejaVuSans-Oblique.ttf satisfy ab language coverage.
[2019-11-19T14:20:10.928Z]     RESULT: FAIL:
/usr/share/fonts/dejavu/DejaVuSans-ExtraLight.ttf doesn't satisfy ab language
coverage.
[2019-11-19T14:20:10.928Z]     RESULT: PASS:
/usr/share/fonts/dejavu/DejaVuSansCondensed-Bold.ttf satisfy ab language
coverage.
[2019-11-19T14:20:10.928Z]     RESULT: PASS:
/usr/share/fonts/dejavu/DejaVuSansCondensed-BoldOblique.ttf satisfy ab language
coverage.
[2019-11-19T14:20:10.928Z]     RESULT: PASS:
/usr/share/fonts/dejavu/DejaVuSansCondensed.ttf satisfy ab language coverage.
[2019-11-19T14:20:10.928Z]     RESULT: PASS:
/usr/share/fonts/dejavu/DejaVuSans-BoldOblique.ttf satisfy ab language
coverage.
[2019-11-19T14:20:10.928Z]     Run test ab: done. Test's exit code: 0

Expected results:
ExtraLight should have same coverage.

Additional info:
As it is an experimental, this may be an RFE.

[Bug 1774474] Missing some coverage in certain variants

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1774474

--- Comment #1 from Akira TAGOH  ---
BTW this isn't ExtraLight specific. there seems more in other weight variants
too. I'll exclude them to pass tests so far and add this as reference for
waiving.

[Bug 1774474] Missing some coverage in certain variants

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1774474

--- Comment #2 from Akira TAGOH  ---
mn-cn and nqo was false alarm.

[Bug 1774474] Missing some coverage in certain variants

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1774474

Nicolas Mailhot  changed:

What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Link ID|                            |Github
                   |                            |dejavu-fonts/dejavu-fonts/i
                   |                            |ssues/347

--- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot  ---
Sadly, upstream seems to be dormant nowadays.

Downstreams like Fedora of Gnome failed to make enough happy noises, to keep
the project contributors motivated :(

[Bug 1774474] Missing some coverage in certain variants

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1774474

--- Comment #5 from Fedora Program Management  ---
This message is a reminder that Fedora 32 is nearing its end of life.
Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora 32 on 2021-05-25.
It is Fedora's policy to close all bug reports from releases that are no longer
maintained. At that time this bug will be closed as EOL if it remains open with
a
Fedora 'version' of '32'.

Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you
plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, simply change the 'version' 
to a later Fedora version.

Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we were not 
able to fix it before Fedora 32 is end of life. If you would still like 
to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it against a later version 
of Fedora, you are encouraged  change the 'version' to a later Fedora 
version prior this bug is closed as described in the policy above.

Although we aim to fix as many bugs as possible during every release's 
lifetime, sometimes those efforts are overtaken by events. Often a 
more recent Fedora release includes newer upstream software that fixes 
bugs or makes them obsolete.

[Bug 1774474] Missing some coverage in certain variants

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1774474

Ben Cotton  changed:

What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |CLOSED
         Resolution|---                         |EOL
        Last Closed|                            |2021-05-25 17:54:25

--- Comment #6 from Ben Cotton  ---
Fedora 32 changed to end-of-life (EOL) status on 2021-05-25. Fedora 32 is
no longer maintained, which means that it will not receive any further
security or bug fix updates. As a result we are closing this bug.

If you can reproduce this bug against a currently maintained version of
Fedora please feel free to reopen this bug against that version. If you
are unable to reopen this bug, please file a new report against the
current release. If you experience problems, please add a comment to this
bug.

Thank you for reporting this bug and we are sorry it could not be fixed.