Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Rebuild against fontpackages-devel depending on fontpackages-filesystem
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477054
Summary: Rebuild against fontpackages-devel depending on fontpackages-filesystem Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: fontconfig AssignedTo: besfahbo@redhat.com ReportedBy: nicolas.mailhot@laposte.net QAContact: extras-qa@fedoraproject.org CC: besfahbo@redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com Blocks: 477044 Classification: Fedora
As previously discussed, and approved by FPC and FESCO, common font packaging stuff has been moved to the fontpackages package.
The filesystem maintainer has been asked to release the corresponding directories in bug #477046
Please rebuild fontconfig against fontpackages-devel to pick up the directory names it defines in macros, and depend on fontpackages-filesystem that owns the directories.
I'll add /etc/fonts to fontpackages to avoid circular deps with fontconfig ASAP
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477054
--- Comment #1 from Behdad Esfahbod besfahbo@redhat.com 2008-12-18 21:00:44 EDT --- Nicolas, fee free to do that.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477054
Jens Petersen petersen@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Rebuild against |[fontconfig] Rebuild |fontpackages-devel |against fontpackages-devel |depending on |depending on |fontpackages-filesystem |fontpackages-filesystem
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477054
Jens Petersen petersen@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|besfahbo@redhat.com |nicolas.mailhot@laposte.net
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477054
--- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mailhot@laposte.net 2009-02-18 14:31:44 EDT --- This is a reminder for all the packagers that still have bugs open about adapting to font packaging guidelines there is only one month left before Fedora 11 beta: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/11/Schedule
A week of this month will see the Fedora 11 mass rebuild, that will load the build farm: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild
As already converted packages showed it is quite possible to make mistakes during the conversion. Please make releng and QA happy and don't wait till the last minute to do your changes (avoid pre-beta panic). If possible start before the mass rebuild so we don't burn cycles on incorrect packages.
The PackageKit enhancements stated for Fedora 11 assume fonts and font-using packages are sane (basically respect packaging guidelines). It is quite possible that not-converted packages will interact with the F11 font autoinstall feature in "interesting" ways. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/AutomaticFontInstallation
We don't want that
There is extensive documentation on the wiki and most of your questions have likely already been answered there. Please do read the FAQ before making more work for the support team by asking questions answered there. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477054
--- Comment #4 from Bug Zapper fedora-triage-list@redhat.com 2010-04-27 08:32:49 EDT ---
This message is a reminder that Fedora 11 is nearing its end of life. Approximately 30 (thirty) days from now Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora 11. It is Fedora's policy to close all bug reports from releases that are no longer maintained. At that time this bug will be closed as WONTFIX if it remains open with a Fedora 'version' of '11'.
Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, simply change the 'version' to a later Fedora version prior to Fedora 11's end of life.
Bug Reporter: Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we may not be able to fix it before Fedora 11 is end of life. If you would still like to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it against a later version of Fedora please change the 'version' of this bug to the applicable version. If you are unable to change the version, please add a comment here and someone will do it for you.
Although we aim to fix as many bugs as possible during every release's lifetime, sometimes those efforts are overtaken by events. Often a more recent Fedora release includes newer upstream software that fixes bugs or makes them obsolete.
The process we are following is described here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477054
Bug Zapper fedora-triage-list@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX
--- Comment #5 from Bug Zapper fedora-triage-list@redhat.com 2010-06-28 06:57:33 EDT ---
Fedora 11 changed to end-of-life (EOL) status on 2010-06-25. Fedora 11 is no longer maintained, which means that it will not receive any further security or bug fix updates. As a result we are closing this bug.
If you can reproduce this bug against a currently maintained version of Fedora please feel free to reopen this bug against that version.
Thank you for reporting this bug and we are sorry it could not be fixed.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477054
Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mailhot@laposte.net changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |Reopened Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|WONTFIX |
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477054
Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mailhot@laposte.net changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|11 |rawhide AssignedTo|nicolas.mailhot@laposte.net |behdad@fedoraproject.org External Bug ID| |FreeDesktop.org 29341
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477054
--- Comment #6 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mailhot@laposte.net 2010-08-01 10:42:26 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=435872) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=435872) Patch to make our fontconfig package use the path definition provided by fontpackages
Behdad, can you look at this?
It depends on upstream makefile changes I've posted in the referenced f.d.o bug
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=29341
With this patch fontconfig no longer installs files in different places from regular font packages, and the fontconfig dtd is registered in system catalogs, so any sane xml tool can validate fontconfig files directly regardless of their place on the filesystem
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477054
Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mailhot@laposte.net changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |ville.skytta@iki.fi
--- Comment #7 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mailhot@laposte.net 2010-10-20 15:51:17 EDT --- *** Bug 645080 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477054
Fedora Admin XMLRPC Client fedora-admin-xmlrpc@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|behdad@fedoraproject.org |mclasen@redhat.com
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Admin XMLRPC Client fedora-admin-xmlrpc@redhat.com 2012-01-10 10:42:50 EST --- This package has changed ownership in the Fedora Package Database. Reassigning to the new owner of this component.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477054
Akira TAGOH tagoh@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED CC| |tagoh@redhat.com Resolution| |RAWHIDE AssignedTo|mclasen@redhat.com |tagoh@redhat.com Last Closed|2010-06-28 06:57:33 |2012-03-21 07:11:26
--- Comment #9 from Akira TAGOH tagoh@redhat.com 2012-03-21 07:11:26 EDT --- Fixed in fontconfig-2.9.0-1.fc18. though 2.9.0 still keeps config files under /etc/fonts/conf.avail, it can be improved in the future release.
fonts-bugs@lists.fedoraproject.org