[Bug 452357] New: The mathml-fonts package needs some cleaning up

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452357

Summary: The mathml-fonts package needs some cleaning up
           Product: Fedora
           Version: rawhide
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: low
          Priority: low
         Component: mathml-fonts
        AssignedTo: [e-mail]
        ReportedBy: [e-mail]
         QAContact: [e-mail]
                CC: [e-mail]

1. Please split the package so different upstreams with different licenses and
different levels of unicode compliance are not mixed toguether

(esp. since http://www.mozilla.org/projects/mathml/fonts/ now recommends *not*
installing some of them)

2. Please make sure the result is conformant with the latest font packaging
guidelines and current fc-cache behaviour
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Annotated_fonts_spec_template

3. Please document the result on
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Category:Packaged_fonts
using
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Font_description_template template

[Bug 452357] The mathml-fonts package needs some cleaning up

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: The mathml-fonts package needs some cleaning up

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452357

------- Additional Comments From [e-mail]  2008-06-21 08:42 EST -------
See also this wishlist item
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Asana_Math_font

[Bug 452357] The mathml-fonts package needs some cleaning up

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: The mathml-fonts package needs some cleaning up

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452357

[e-mail] changed:

What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
           Keywords|                            |FutureFeature

------- Additional Comments From [e-mail]  2008-07-02 11:52 EST -------
Nod, such cleanups have been a long-standing todo item of mine.  Still 
pondering the best approach to take here.

brainstorm:
1 make each upstream a subpkg
2 kill mathml-fonts altogether, package each upstream separately
3 some combo of 1 and 2

[Bug 452357] The mathml-fonts package needs some cleaning up

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: The mathml-fonts package needs some cleaning up

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452357

------- Additional Comments From [e-mail]  2008-07-02 13:10 EST -------
Obviously, I prefer do-it-all-cleanly option 2, but since you're the one doing
the work, that's your choice

[Bug 452357] The mathml-fonts package needs some cleaning up

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452357

--- Comment #4 from Rex Dieter   2009-07-27 12:13:34 EDT ---
The more I look at it, the more 2 seems to be the only sane option here.  Will
commence working on split items.

[Bug 452357] The mathml-fonts package needs some cleaning up

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452357

--- Comment #5 from Rex Dieter   2009-07-27 12:14:36 EDT ---
*** Bug 477423 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug 452357] The mathml-fonts package needs some cleaning up

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452357

--- Comment #6 from Rex Dieter   2009-07-27 13:31:10 EDT ---
mailed owners of packages with deps on mathml-fonts, including koffice, lyx,
abiword, for details on what specifically is required by each of them.

In the near future, I'll EOL mathml-fonts, and potentially resurrect anything
still needed.

[Bug 452357] The mathml-fonts package needs some cleaning up

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452357

Rex Dieter  changed:

What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         Depends on|                            |514549

--- Comment #7 from Rex Dieter   2009-07-29 11:53:58 EDT ---
lyx-fonts pkg submitted for review, bug #514549

[Bug 452357] The mathml-fonts package needs some cleaning up

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452357

Jussi Lehtola  changed:

What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |[e-mail]

--- Comment #8 from Jussi Lehtola   2009-07-29 17:15:29 EDT ---
At least LyX is also available on EPEL and AFAIK the modern style font packages
work only on >= F11 thanks to a series of mutually incompatible policy changes
in the past.

What's the workaround for EPEL? Do you stick with mathml-fonts in the current
EPEL releases?

[Bug 452357] The mathml-fonts package needs some cleaning up

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452357

--- Comment #9 from Rex Dieter   2009-07-30 13:57:29 EDT ---
I'll make sure things stay compatible on the epel side of things, whether that
means sticking with mathml-fonts as they are or incorporating something new,
but compatible, is still unclear.

[Bug 452357] The mathml-fonts package needs some cleaning up

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452357

Bug 452357 depends on bug 514549, which changed state.

Bug 514549 Summary: Review Request: lyx-fonts - Math Symbol fonts
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514549

What    |Old Value                   |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |CLOSED
         Resolution|                            |NOTABUG

[Bug 452357] The mathml-fonts package needs some cleaning up

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452357

Rex Dieter  changed:

What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |CLOSED
         Resolution|                            |RAWHIDE

--- Comment #10 from Rex Dieter   2009-08-03 13:27:36 EDT ---
now build as part of lyx

* Mon Aug 03 2009 Rex Dieter  - 1.6.3-3              
- add lyx-*-fonts subpkgs (#452357, #514549)                                    
- -common (noarch) subpkg                                                       
- trim %changelog

TODO/FIXME remains to make lyx compatible with EPEL (in the absense of
fontpackages-devel).  Still pondering on how best to do that.  May end up doing
the font management by hand, not relying on fontpackages-devel at all.... not
sure.

[Bug 452357] The mathml-fonts package needs some cleaning up

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452357

--- Comment #11 from Nicolas Mailhot   2009-08-03 13:54:54 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #10)
> TODO/FIXME remains to make lyx compatible with EPEL (in the absense of
> fontpackages-devel).  Still pondering on how best to do that.  May end up doing
> the font management by hand, not relying on fontpackages-devel at all.... not
> sure.

fontpackages can probably be imported directly in EPEL if you need it, at worst
you'll have to tweak the spec templates so they don't use stuff like noarch
subpackages. The only hard dep of fontpackages is rpm (also if fontconfig is
too old it won't autogenerate font metadata but then there's probably nothing
to use it it EPEL either right now)

[Bug 452357] The mathml-fonts package needs some cleaning up

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452357

--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System   2009-08-26 15:31:31 EDT ---
lyx-1.6.4-1.fc11,koffice-1.6.3-24.20090306svn.fc11 has been submitted as an
update for Fedora 11.
http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/lyx-1.6.4-1.fc11,koffice-1.6.3-24.200...

[Bug 452357] The mathml-fonts package needs some cleaning up

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452357

--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System   2009-08-26 15:45:52 EDT ---
lyx-1.6.4-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10.
http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/lyx-1.6.4-1.fc10

[Bug 452357] The mathml-fonts package needs some cleaning up

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452357

--- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System   2009-09-15 03:52:48 EDT ---
lyx-1.6.4-1.fc11, koffice-1.6.3-24.20090306svn.fc11 has been pushed to the
Fedora 11 stable repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it
in this bug report.

[Bug 452357] The mathml-fonts package needs some cleaning up

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452357

Fedora Update System  changed:

What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Fixed In Version|                            |1.6.4-1.fc11
         Resolution|RAWHIDE                     |ERRATA

[Bug 452357] The mathml-fonts package needs some cleaning up

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452357

--- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System   2009-09-15 03:56:59 EDT ---
lyx-1.6.4-1.fc10, koffice-1.6.3-24.20090306svn.fc10 has been pushed to the
Fedora 10 stable repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it
in this bug report.

[Bug 452357] The mathml-fonts package needs some cleaning up

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452357

Fedora Update System  changed:

What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Fixed In Version|1.6.4-1.fc11                |1.6.4-1.fc10

[Bug 452357] The mathml-fonts package needs some cleaning up

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452357

--- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System   2009-09-16 22:29:59 EDT ---
lyx-1.6.4-1.el5, koffice-1.6.3-24.20090306svn.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora
EPEL 5 stable repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in
this bug report.