[Bug 448289] [ro] Fonts in distribution contains incorrect glyphs for Romanian language

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: [ro] Fonts in distribution contains incorrect glyphs for Romanian language

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448289

[e-mail] changed:

What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |CLOSED
         Resolution|                            |INSUFFICIENT_DATA

------- Additional Comments From [e-mail]  2008-05-28 18:34 EST -------
(In reply to comment #8)
> As far as I know, the keyboard maps for Romanian were recently fixed and should
> land in Fedora from upstream. Please see
> http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13277
>
> In the meantime, *until* the kbd fix shows up,

The kbd fix probably does not matter. IIRC the plan for F10 is to kill kbd and
generate console layouts from xkb-config data
> [fonts] make sure that all Unicode fonts that can be used for Romanian
>
> language (basically, the Latin2 subsets) contain the comma-below glyphs. (For
> me, it is not so obvious *which font packages are involved*, otherwise I'll

open bugs directly on them);

It's pretty useless to open bugs on fonts. We've spent a lot of energy kicking
non-modifiable fonts from Fedora and getting recent font tools such as fontforge
in. So interested people should just submit fixed fonts upstream instead of
waiting for someone else to fix them.

Identifying fonts can be done this way
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SIGs/Fonts/QA#Identifying_fonts
> [anaconda] *after* the font issue is fixed, anaconda should set an

appropriate default font for Romanian,

As other explained Fedora default X11 fonts are already fine. So there is
nothing to do X11-side. Terminal-side someone should just fix latarcyrheb which
is the usual default everyone gets. Then no special selection logic will be
needed at all.
> So I'm changing this to distribution again.

This is pretty useless. Fix the problems one by one or at least report them
one-by-one (*upstream*). Multi-issue "distribution" bugs just go nowhere.