Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=367791
Summary: remove 59-liberation-fonts.conf Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: liberation-fonts AssignedTo: cchance@redhat.com ReportedBy: besfahbo@redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa@fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
fontconfig-2.4.92-1 that I'm just building contains all the configuration done in 59-liberation-fonts.conf, and much more to make liberation-fonts useful. Please remove that file for F9.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: remove 59-liberation-fonts.conf
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=367791
cchance@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE
------- Additional Comments From cchance@redhat.com 2007-11-27 22:21 EST ------- Patched & built.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=367791
Pravin Satpute psatpute@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |psatpute@redhat.com, | |tagoh@redhat.com
--- Comment #2 from Pravin Satpute psatpute@redhat.com --- As per latest font packaging guideline, i am adding fontconfig files now. Also want to add some hinting instructions for Liberation Mono.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=367791
--- Comment #3 from Akira TAGOH tagoh@redhat.com --- If it's the common case, maybe good to consider contributing the changes to fontconfig upstream perhaps.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=367791
--- Comment #4 from Pravin Satpute psatpute@redhat.com --- Those are very specific. Basically added https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=842568#c3 in conf for mono.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=367791
--- Comment #5 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mailhot@laposte.net --- (In reply to comment #3)
If it's the common case, maybe good to consider contributing the changes to fontconfig upstream perhaps.
Just IMHO, it's better when the fontconfig files are shipped with the font files themselves, and upstreamed font project side. This way the font project (which is supposed to know its font best) is in charge of fontconfig tweaking
At least, this is how it was done for dejavu.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=367791
--- Comment #6 from Pravin Satpute psatpute@redhat.com --- Thanks Nicholas, will follow it for now.
fonts-bugs@lists.fedoraproject.org