[Bug 445176] New: [ml_IN] Conjuncts combining with 0D30 do not form the pre based glyph

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445176

Summary: [ml_IN] Conjuncts combining with 0D30 do not form the
                    pre based glyph
           Product: Fedora
           Version: rawhide
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: low
          Priority: low
         Component: lohit-fonts
        AssignedTo: [e-mail]
        ReportedBy: [e-mail]
         QAContact: [e-mail]
                CC: [e-mail],[e-mail],fedora-fonts-
                    [e-mail],[e-mail]

Description of problem:

Conjuncts does not get combined with 0D30 to form the pre based glyph, instead
the conjunct, 0D4D and 0D30 just appear in key sequence.

How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. In gedit, type 0D38 + 0D4D + 0D24 + 0D4D + 0D30

Actual results:
In the above step, when 0D38 + 0D4D + 0D24 + 0D4D + 0D30 is typed the conjunct
0D38 + 0D4D + 0D24 is followed by 0D4D and 0D30.

Expected results:
In the above step,when 0D38 + 0D4D + 0D24 + 0D4D + 0D30 is typed the conjunct
0D38 + 0D4D + 0D24  must have the pre-based glyph that is formed using 0D4D
and 0D30.

Additional info:
For ref: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444561

[Bug 445176] [ml_IN] Conjuncts combining with 0D30 do not form the pre based glyph

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445176

Tony Fu  changed:

What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|[e-mail]    |[e-mail]

--- Comment #2 from Tony Fu   2008-09-09 23:10:18 EDT ---
requested by Jens Petersen (#27995)

[Bug 445176] [ml_IN] Conjuncts combining with 0D30 do not form the pre based glyph

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445176

Rahul Bhalerao  changed:

What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Flag|                            |needinfo?([e-mail]
                   |                            |)

--- Comment #3 from Rahul Bhalerao   2009-02-25 02:39:28 EDT ---
Ani,Is it still present? I think this is fixed but cannot judge in the absence
of a screenshot :)

[Bug 445176] [ml_IN] Conjuncts combining with 0D30 do not form the pre based glyph

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445176

Ani Peter  changed:

What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Flag|needinfo?([e-mail] |
                   |)                           |

--- Comment #4 from Ani Peter   2009-03-06 03:42:58 EDT ---
Rahul,

Apologies for replying late. This works perfect.

Screenshot attached.

Thanks a lot.

[Bug 445176] [ml_IN] Conjuncts combining with 0D30 do not form the pre based glyph

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445176

--- Comment #5 from Ani Peter   2009-03-06 03:43:46 EDT ---
Created an attachment (id=334268)
 --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=334268)
Screenshot from the present font

[Bug 445176] [ml_IN] Conjuncts combining with 0D30 do not form the pre based glyph

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445176

Rahul Bhalerao  changed:

What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |CLOSED
         Resolution|                            |CURRENTRELEASE

--- Comment #6 from Rahul Bhalerao   2009-03-06 03:47:09 EDT ---
Ani, thanks for confirming, closing this bug now.