Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: andika-fonts - Andika SIL fonts
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452663
------- Additional Comments From nicolas.mailhot@laposte.net 2008-06-25 15:48 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1)
Informal package review:
-Summary: Andika SIL fonts +Summary: Andika is a sans serif font designed for literacy use and for beginning readers
- No need to be so brief, ~80 chars are usually ok for rpmlint.
Actually rpmlint has a 79 column limit and your proposal is 80
Though I suppose “A SIL sans serif font designed for literacy use and for beginning readers” would be fine
-* Tue Jun 24 2008 <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net> -- 1.0-1 -Ṑ Initial packaging +* Tue Jun 24 2008 <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net> - 1.0-1
the rpm maintainers will tell you anything after the mail is garbage (but it's a common mistake, even if the guidelines authorize both)
+- Initial packaging
You'll take unicode out of my dead hands :) changelog is and always been UTF-8
Seems good to me.
Thanks for the review, care to do an official one?
fonts-bugs@lists.fedoraproject.org