Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476459
--- Comment #32 from Akira TAGOH tagoh@redhat.com 2009-05-12 00:55:36 EDT --- (In reply to comment #31)
I don't think so. I am not saying this must be included in fontconfig upstream (which get updated slowly), we can certainly create a new package which only include these CJK specific config files. Even fontconfig have similar files, we can still ship something to override if it gets updated. But the key idea is not to let individual font to do this. Functional-wise, they are completely equivalent.
I have never been saying about fontconfig upstream but the centralized management is painful to maintain.
Either way does not prevent people from customizing their own list. As I said, they are simply equivalent.
Sure. so how is it better than applying it with the package installation then?
fonts-bugs@lists.fedoraproject.org