Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
--- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net> 2011-11-17
05:37:39 EST ---
(In reply to comment #3)
(In reply to comment #1)
> Because I don't relish the
> thought of packaging it separately (I know where the unicode consortium
> publishes it, but the legal aspects are unpleasant)
and the license (Exhibit 1 on that page), which according to this message:
That's a nice change. IIRC it was not always so (that's why I piggybacked on
So, packaging the data could be useful to us?
Yes. That would help dejavu, but also all the packages that ship unicode
definitions, and could be cleaned up to use a central package (that could be
synced with unicode releases instead of each package shipping obsolete
If you feel like doing some resource packaging
is also duplicated
Otherwise I'll just package unicode data next time dejavu does a release and I
need to rebuild the package
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.