Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Won't compile with Perl-5.14.1-187
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=748522
Summary: Won't compile with Perl-5.14.1-187 Product: Fedora Version: 16 Platform: Unspecified OS/Version: Unspecified Status: NEW Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Component: dejavu-fonts AssignedTo: nicolas.mailhot@laposte.net ReportedBy: JMiahMan@gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa@fedoraproject.org CC: nicolas.mailhot@laposte.net, peter@thecodergeek.com, fonts-bugs@lists.fedoraproject.org, paul@frixxon.co.uk Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Type: ---
Description of problem: The Dejavu-fonts fail to meet buildrequires to compile due to missing file:
/usr/share/perl5/unicore/UnicodeData.txt
This file was offered by Perl in previous releases but seems to be missing in Perl 5.14
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 2.33
How reproducible: Try and rebuild dejavu-fonts with Perl version 5.14.1-187
Steps to Reproduce: 1. Make sure your build environment has Perl version 5.14.1-187 2. try and build dejavu-fonts from src rpm 3. watch it complain about missing buildrequires even though Perl is installed
Actual results: BuildRequires not met, failed build
Expected results: Perl should provide missing file again or BuildRequires should be changes in spec file for dejavu-fonts
Additional info:
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=748522
Jeremiah JMiahMan@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Won't compile with |dejavu-fonts Won't compile |Perl-5.14.1-187 |with Perl-5.14.1-187
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=748522
Jeremiah JMiahMan@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|dejavu-fonts Won't compile |dejavu-fonts will not |with Perl-5.14.1-187 |compile with | |Perl-5.14.1-187
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=748522
Jeremiah JMiahMan@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|dejavu-fonts will not |dejavu-fonts fails to build |compile with |with Perl-5.14.1-187 |Perl-5.14.1-187 |
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=748522
--- Comment #1 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mailhot@laposte.net 2011-10-25 16:04:00 EDT --- Drat, did the perl guys move the file elsewhere? Because I don't relish the thought of packaging it separately (I know where the unicode consortium publishes it, but the legal aspects are unpleasant)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=748522
--- Comment #2 from Paul Flo Williams paul@frixxon.co.uk 2011-11-16 07:33:13 EST --- Perl 5.14 has removed some files from .../unicore/ in an effort to trim it (according to git logs) from 17M to 7M. Blocks.txt has survived, but UnicodeData.txt is no longer shipped.
Other existing providers of UnicodeData.txt on F16 are:
boost-devel mingw32-boost moodle
Unfortunately, none of these also contain Blocks.txt.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=748522
--- Comment #3 from Paul Flo Williams paul@frixxon.co.uk 2011-11-16 07:46:54 EST --- (In reply to comment #1)
Because I don't relish the thought of packaging it separately (I know where the unicode consortium publishes it, but the legal aspects are unpleasant)
I've just taken a look at the Unicode terms of use:
http://www.unicode.org/copyright.html
and the license (Exhibit 1 on that page), which according to this message:
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/legal/2009-February/000540.html
is MIT. So, packaging the data could be useful to us?
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=748522
--- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mailhot@laposte.net 2011-11-17 05:37:39 EST --- (In reply to comment #3)
(In reply to comment #1)
Because I don't relish the thought of packaging it separately (I know where the unicode consortium publishes it, but the legal aspects are unpleasant)
I've just taken a look at the Unicode terms of use:
http://www.unicode.org/copyright.html
and the license (Exhibit 1 on that page), which according to this message:
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/legal/2009-February/000540.html
is MIT.
That's a nice change. IIRC it was not always so (that's why I piggybacked on perl originally)
So, packaging the data could be useful to us?
Yes. That would help dejavu, but also all the packages that ship unicode definitions, and could be cleaned up to use a central package (that could be synced with unicode releases instead of each package shipping obsolete definitions)
If you feel like doing some resource packaging http://opensource.adobe.com/wiki/display/cmap/CMap+Resources is also duplicated everywhere
Otherwise I'll just package unicode data next time dejavu does a release and I need to rebuild the package
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=748522
Jens Petersen petersen@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|unspecified |medium
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=748522
Jens Petersen petersen@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |757290
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=748522
--- Comment #5 from Jens Petersen petersen@redhat.com 2011-11-26 02:11:44 EST --- Ok I packaged Unicode UCD in bug 757290 if anyone wants to help review it. :)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=748522
Jens Petersen petersen@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |756963
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=748522
Jens Petersen petersen@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |MODIFIED
--- Comment #6 from Jens Petersen petersen@redhat.com 2011-12-06 00:18:59 EST --- Fixed in dejavu-fonts-2.33-2.fc16
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=276334
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=748522
--- Comment #7 from Fedora End Of Life endoflife@fedoraproject.org --- This message is a reminder that Fedora 16 is nearing its end of life. Approximately 4 (four) weeks from now Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora 16. It is Fedora's policy to close all bug reports from releases that are no longer maintained. At that time this bug will be closed as WONTFIX if it remains open with a Fedora 'version' of '16'.
Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, simply change the 'version' to a later Fedora version prior to Fedora 16's end of life.
Bug Reporter: Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we may not be able to fix it before Fedora 16 is end of life. If you would still like to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it against a later version of Fedora, you are encouraged to click on "Clone This Bug" and open it against that version of Fedora.
Although we aim to fix as many bugs as possible during every release's lifetime, sometimes those efforts are overtaken by events. Often a more recent Fedora release includes newer upstream software that fixes bugs or makes them obsolete.
The process we are following is described here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=748522
Fedora End Of Life endoflife@fedoraproject.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |CLOSED Resolution|--- |WONTFIX Last Closed| |2013-02-13 21:55:32
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=748522
--- Comment #8 from Fedora End Of Life endoflife@fedoraproject.org --- Fedora 16 changed to end-of-life (EOL) status on 2013-02-12. Fedora 16 is no longer maintained, which means that it will not receive any further security or bug fix updates. As a result we are closing this bug.
If you can reproduce this bug against a currently maintained version of Fedora please feel free to reopen this bug against that version.
Thank you for reporting this bug and we are sorry it could not be fixed.
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=748522
Jens Petersen petersen@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|WONTFIX |CURRENTRELEASE
fonts-bugs@lists.fedoraproject.org