Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450709
Summary: fontforge can't find -ibm-courier-medium-r-normal font Product: Fedora Version: 9 Platform: i386 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: fontforge AssignedTo: kevin@tummy.com ReportedBy: rdtennent@hotmail.com QAContact: extras-qa@fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com,roozbeh@farsiweb.info
Description of problem:
When I start up fontforge, I get the following error message:
Help! Server claimed font -ibm-courier-medium-r-normal--26-0-0-0-m-0-iso10646-1 existed in the font list, but when I asked for it there was nothing. I may crash soon. Segmentation fault
I've never see this behavior before.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 20080309-1.fc9
How reproducible: every time, on three different F9 systems
Steps to Reproduce: 1.start fontforge 2. 3.
Actual results: as above
Expected results: fontforge opens
Additional info:
% xlsfonts | grep "ibm-courier" -ibm-courier-bold-i-normal--0-0-0-0-m-0-adobe-standard -ibm-courier-bold-i-normal--0-0-0-0-m-0-ascii-0 -ibm-courier-bold-i-normal--0-0-0-0-m-0-iso10646-1 -ibm-courier-bold-i-normal--0-0-0-0-m-0-iso8859-1 -ibm-courier-bold-i-normal--0-0-0-0-m-0-iso8859-3 -ibm-courier-bold-i-normal--0-0-0-0-m-0-iso8859-9 -ibm-courier-bold-r-normal--0-0-0-0-m-0-adobe-standard -ibm-courier-bold-r-normal--0-0-0-0-m-0-ascii-0 -ibm-courier-bold-r-normal--0-0-0-0-m-0-iso10646-1 -ibm-courier-bold-r-normal--0-0-0-0-m-0-iso8859-1 -ibm-courier-bold-r-normal--0-0-0-0-m-0-iso8859-3 -ibm-courier-bold-r-normal--0-0-0-0-m-0-iso8859-9 -ibm-courier-medium-i-normal--0-0-0-0-m-0-adobe-standard -ibm-courier-medium-i-normal--0-0-0-0-m-0-ascii-0 -ibm-courier-medium-i-normal--0-0-0-0-m-0-iso10646-1 -ibm-courier-medium-i-normal--0-0-0-0-m-0-iso8859-1 -ibm-courier-medium-i-normal--0-0-0-0-m-0-iso8859-3 -ibm-courier-medium-i-normal--0-0-0-0-m-0-iso8859-9 -ibm-courier-medium-r-normal--0-0-0-0-m-0-adobe-standard -ibm-courier-medium-r-normal--0-0-0-0-m-0-ascii-0 -ibm-courier-medium-r-normal--0-0-0-0-m-0-iso10646-1 -ibm-courier-medium-r-normal--0-0-0-0-m-0-iso8859-1 -ibm-courier-medium-r-normal--0-0-0-0-m-0-iso8859-3 -ibm-courier-medium-r-normal--0-0-0-0-m-0-iso8859-9
% fc-list "Courier 10 Pitch" Courier 10 Pitch:style=Bold Italic Courier 10 Pitch:style=Italic Courier 10 Pitch:style=Regular Courier 10 Pitch:style=Bold
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: fontforge can't find -ibm-courier-medium-r-normal font
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450709
kevin@tummy.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
------- Additional Comments From kevin@tummy.com 2008-06-10 12:29 EST ------- What font packages do you have installed?
output of 'rpm -qa | grep fonts | sort' ?
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: fontforge can't find -ibm-courier-medium-r-normal font
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450709
------- Additional Comments From rdtennent@hotmail.com 2008-06-10 12:43 EST -------
What font packages do you have installed?
% rpm -qa | grep fonts | sort bitmap-fonts-0.3-5.2.fc9.noarch bitstream-vera-fonts-1.10-8.noarch dejavu-fonts-2.24-3.fc9.noarch dejavu-fonts-experimental-2.24-3.fc9.noarch gentium-fonts-1.02-5.fc7.noarch ghostscript-fonts-5.50-18.fc8.noarch java-1.5.0-sun-fonts-1.5.0.09-1jpp.i586 jmk-x11-fonts-3.0-1.i386 liberation-fonts-1.0-4.fc9.noarch lohit-fonts-punjabi-2.2.1-2.fc9.noarch lohit-fonts-telugu-2.2.1-2.fc9.noarch mathml-fonts-1.0-21.fc6.noarch mplayer-fonts-1.0-7.at.noarch msttcorefonts-1.3-4.noarch texlive-texmf-errata-fonts-2007-4.fc9.noarch texlive-texmf-fonts-2007-22.fc9.noarch ttfonts-1.0-9.noarch urw-fonts-2.4-5.fc9.noarch xorg-x11-fonts-100dpi-7.2-6.fc9.noarch xorg-x11-fonts-75dpi-7.2-6.fc9.noarch xorg-x11-fonts-ISO8859-1-100dpi-7.2-6.fc9.noarch xorg-x11-fonts-ISO8859-1-75dpi-7.2-6.fc9.noarch xorg-x11-fonts-misc-7.2-6.fc9.noarch xorg-x11-fonts-Type1-7.2-6.fc9.noarch
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: fontforge can't find -ibm-courier-medium-r-normal font
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450709
------- Additional Comments From rdtennent@hotmail.com 2008-06-10 14:50 EST ------- The problem seems to have been fonts.{scale,dir} files that weren't upgraded when I upgraded from f8 to f9. After doing
fc-cache /usr/share/X11/fonts/Type1
fontforge starts up okay. Should the bug report be transferred to xorg-x11-fonts-Type1?
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: fontforge can't find -ibm-courier-medium-r-normal font
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450709
------- Additional Comments From kevin@tummy.com 2008-06-10 15:13 EST ------- Yeah, I would think so. It should regenerate it's caches on upgrade... Would you like me to reassign it?
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: fontforge can't find -ibm-courier-medium-r-normal font
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450709
------- Additional Comments From rdtennent@hotmail.com 2008-06-10 15:57 EST ------- Please do. I've confirmed on another system that the fonts.{scale,dir} files are not updated when xorg-x11-fonts-Type1 is upgraded from 7.2-3.fc8 to 7.2-6.fc9.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: xorg-x11-fonts-Type1 doesn't update cache files on upgrade
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450709
kevin@tummy.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|roozbeh@farsiweb.info | AssignedTo|kevin@tummy.com |xgl-maint@redhat.com Component|fontforge |xorg-x11-fonts Summary|fontforge can't find -ibm- |xorg-x11-fonts-Type1 doesn't |courier-medium-r-normal font|update cache files on | |upgrade
------- Additional Comments From kevin@tummy.com 2008-06-10 16:02 EST ------- Re-assigning. Thanks again for reporting this!
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: xorg-x11-fonts-Type1 doesn't update cache files on upgrade
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450709
nicolas.mailhot@laposte.net changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |cchance@redhat.com
------- Additional Comments From nicolas.mailhot@laposte.net 2008-06-21 09:15 EST ------- *** Bug 444377 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: xorg-x11-fonts-Type1 doesn't update cache files on upgrade
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450709
kevin@tummy.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |bnocera@redhat.com
------- Additional Comments From kevin@tummy.com 2008-07-29 18:12 EST ------- *** Bug 457021 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450709
Tony Fu tfu@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|eng-i18n-bugs@redhat.com |fedora-i18n-bugs@redhat.com
--- Comment #9 from Tony Fu tfu@redhat.com 2008-09-09 23:15:15 EDT --- requested by Jens Petersen (#27995)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450709
Kevin Fenzi kevin@tummy.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |sangu.fedora@gmail.com
--- Comment #10 from Kevin Fenzi kevin@tummy.com 2008-10-10 01:11:15 EDT --- *** Bug 466404 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450709
--- Comment #11 from Kevin Fenzi kevin@tummy.com 2008-12-02 01:37:46 EDT --- *** Bug 466404 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450709
--- Comment #12 from Jens Petersen petersen@redhat.com 2009-01-05 21:44:04 EDT --- Ping?
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450709
Hans Ulrich Niedermann rhbugs@n-dimensional.de changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rhbugs@n-dimensional.de
--- Comment #13 from Hans Ulrich Niedermann rhbugs@n-dimensional.de 2009-01-17 15:55:03 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3)
The problem seems to have been fonts.{scale,dir} files that weren't upgraded when I upgraded from f8 to f9. After doing
fc-cache /usr/share/X11/fonts/Type1
This does not help on my system.
F9 (upgraded from F8),
xorg-x11-fonts-Type1-7.2-6.fc9.noarch fontconfig-2.5.0-2.fc9.i386
fc-cache does not touch fonts.{scale,dir}, apparently.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450709
Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mailhot@laposte.net changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |nicolas.mailhot@laposte.net
--- Comment #14 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mailhot@laposte.net 2009-01-17 16:03:42 EDT --- fontconfig does not use fonts.{scale,dir}. They're only needed by the old brittle legacy deprecated X11 core font systems
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450709
--- Comment #15 from Hans Ulrich Niedermann rhbugs@n-dimensional.de 2009-01-18 10:39:24 EDT --- Unfortunately, this "old brittle legacy etc." font system prevents, of all things, "fontforge" from launching.
Is there any way to get "fontforge" to run? (The fontforge bug has been marked a duplicate of this one.)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450709
Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mailhot@laposte.net changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |nicolas.mailhot@laposte.net
--- Comment #16 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mailhot@laposte.net 2009-01-18 13:42:35 EDT --- You can always try the rawhide fontforge version, it's supposed to use cairo and other modern stuff now
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450709
Caius CHANCE cchance@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |i18n
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450709
--- Comment #17 from Jens Petersen petersen@redhat.com 2009-01-21 19:59:38 EDT --- I wonder if comment 7 is not due to the removal of ibm-type1 fonts from fedora?
* Mon Jan 14 2008 Tom "spot" Callaway tcallawa@redhat.com - 7.2-6 - IBM refused to relicense ibm-type1 fonts with permission to modify, so they were dropped (bugzilla 317641)
Maybe fontforge needs to be patched to use another font, or that already fixed? (Runs for me anyway with F10 and rawhide.)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450709
Dwayne Bailey dwayne@translate.org.za changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dwayne@translate.org.za
--- Comment #18 from Dwayne Bailey dwayne@translate.org.za 2009-02-11 11:08:18 EDT --- Bad news from me. I had this problem, removed all the X11 fonts and things worked. A then added a number of cool fonts and bang its broken again with this error:
Help! Server claimed font -misc-ar pl uming tw-light-r-normal--16-0-0-0-c-0-iso10646-1 existed in the font list, but when I asked for it there was nothing.
I ran fc-cache against each directory separately but this changed nothing. How the H^ll do I know which font is breaking this.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450709
--- Comment #19 from Dwayne Bailey dwayne@translate.org.za 2009-02-11 11:26:10 EDT --- Just remember I did a 'yum groupupdate Fonts' to make sure my default fonts included all standard installs. Things broke at some stage after that.
But I've tracked this down, if I do:
yum remove cjkunifonts-uming
fontforge now works
yum groupupdate Fonts
This will reinstall cjkunifonts-uming and things break. So the default fonts installed are causing the fontforge breakage and specifically cjkunifonts-uming.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450709
Matej Cepl mcepl@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(rdtennent@hotmail | |.com)
--- Comment #20 from Matej Cepl mcepl@redhat.com 2009-02-11 18:41:13 EDT --- I have to ask “wrong question” — are you able to reproduce it with Fedora 10?
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450709
--- Comment #21 from Jens Petersen petersen@redhat.com 2009-02-13 04:06:56 EDT --- (In reply to comment #19)
yum remove cjkunifonts-uming fontforge now works yum groupupdate Fonts This will reinstall cjkunifonts-uming and things break. So the default fonts installed are causing the fontforge breakage and specifically cjkunifonts-uming.
Dwayne, could you please file a separate bug against cjkunifonts (or cjkuni-fonts if it is rawhide) - this sounds unrelated to this bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450709
--- Comment #22 from Dwayne Bailey dwayne@translate.org.za 2009-02-13 12:33:29 EDT --- (In reply to comment #21)
(In reply to comment #19)
yum remove cjkunifonts-uming fontforge now works yum groupupdate Fonts This will reinstall cjkunifonts-uming and things break. So the default fonts installed are causing the fontforge breakage and specifically cjkunifonts-uming.
Dwayne, could you please file a separate bug against cjkunifonts (or cjkuni-fonts if it is rawhide) - this sounds unrelated to this bug.
Its related in that it does the same thing, but on a different font. See bug 485472 for a report against cjkunifonts.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450709
Nils Philippsen nphilipp@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |nphilipp@redhat.com Flag|needinfo?(rdtennent@hotmail | |.com) |
--- Comment #23 from Nils Philippsen nphilipp@redhat.com 2009-02-19 05:12:20 EDT --- I could reproduce this on F-10.
More infos about this can be found in the comments of bug #466404:
Whenever fontforge crashes, /var/log/Xorg.0.log updates $ cat /var/log/Xorg.0.log [...] FreeType: couldn't open face /usr/share/X11/fonts/Type1/cour.pfa: 1 FreeType: couldn't open face /usr/share/X11/fonts/Type1/cour.pfa: 1 FreeType: couldn't open face /usr/share/X11/fonts/Type1/cour.pfa: 1 FreeType: couldn't open face /usr/share/X11/fonts/Type1/cour.pfa: 1 FreeType: couldn't open face /usr/share/X11/fonts/Type1/cour.pfa: 1 FreeType: couldn't open face /usr/share/X11/fonts/Type1/cour.pfa: 1
When fontforge crashed on me, only these two files referenced "cour.pfa" in any way:
/usr/share/X11/fonts/Type1/fonts.dir /usr/share/X11/fonts/Type1/fonts.scale
After I uninstalled and reinstalled xorg-x11-fonts-Type1, fontforge worked again and the two files didn't reference cour.pfa anymore. It seems to me that the mkfontdir, mkfontscale commands in the %post/%postun scripts fail to remove references to fonts that are removed from the fonts.dir, fonts.scale files. In that case, the problem is not in the fonts packages, but in these tools.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450709
--- Comment #24 from Bug Zapper fedora-triage-list@redhat.com 2009-06-09 21:31:09 EDT ---
This message is a reminder that Fedora 9 is nearing its end of life. Approximately 30 (thirty) days from now Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora 9. It is Fedora's policy to close all bug reports from releases that are no longer maintained. At that time this bug will be closed as WONTFIX if it remains open with a Fedora 'version' of '9'.
Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, simply change the 'version' to a later Fedora version prior to Fedora 9's end of life.
Bug Reporter: Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we may not be able to fix it before Fedora 9 is end of life. If you would still like to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it against a later version of Fedora please change the 'version' of this bug to the applicable version. If you are unable to change the version, please add a comment here and someone will do it for you.
Although we aim to fix as many bugs as possible during every release's lifetime, sometimes those efforts are overtaken by events. Often a more recent Fedora release includes newer upstream software that fixes bugs or makes them obsolete.
The process we are following is described here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450709
--- Comment #25 from Jens Petersen petersen@redhat.com 2009-06-23 03:07:32 EDT --- Is this still an issue with F10, F11 and later?
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450709
--- Comment #26 from Nils Philippsen nphilipp@redhat.com 2009-06-23 07:42:02 EDT --- On my F-11 system, I inserted a fake font entry in fonts.dir, fonts.scale, re-ran the xorg-x11-fonts-Type1 %post script and it was removed.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450709
Jens Petersen petersen@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE
--- Comment #27 from Jens Petersen petersen@redhat.com 2009-06-23 20:40:50 EDT --- Thanks Nils - I am assuming that is ok then with newer fedora and closing out.
fonts-bugs@lists.fedoraproject.org