Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525872
--- Comment #9 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net> 2009-09-26
12:18:17 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #6)
I get several hits in src/3rdparty/freetype, which isn't really a
problem for
Qt as we don't ship its copy of freetype, but I guess you'll want to file a bug
against freetype (and I'll clone the fix into freetype-freeworld as soon as
freetype has it fixed).
Yes. I'm also thinking of pointing Spot to this mess, as those files seems
duplicated pretty much everywhere, and this is the kind of cleanup op he did
before
There's also a hit for afii64937 inside
src/gui/text/qfontsubset.cpp in the
static const char * const agl array. That array appears to contain a processed
copy of the data with no Adobe copyright notice. What should I do with it? Add
a copy of the new copyright notice and the BSD license in a patch? (I guess
it'll also need to show up somewhere in "supporting documentation" to
really
comply with the license and to actually make sense to patch for.)
I suppose the clean solution would be to make it process a canonical copy of
the data at build time (that will make the licensing appear in rpm deps checks,
and make sure QT uses the same values as others). Dunno about the licensing
patch. To be honest my primary interest is to make sure all our software uses
the same values, and the legal angle is just here to make people interested
--
Configure bugmail:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.