[Bug 428623] New: VLGothic-fonts.noarch is empty

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428623

Summary: VLGothic-fonts.noarch is empty
           Product: Fedora
           Version: rawhide
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: low
          Priority: low
         Component: VLGothic-fonts
        AssignedTo: [e-mail]
        ReportedBy: [e-mail]
         QAContact: [e-mail]
                CC: [e-mail],fedora-fonts-bugs-
                    [e-mail]

Description of problem:
The main VLGothic-fonts package is empty.
It would be better not to have a file list for it IMHO so it is not generated.

Though personally I would prefer just to have the monospace font
in VLGothic-fonts and the proportional font in VLGothic-fonts-proportional say.

I think it is not really worth having a separate package VLGothic-fonts-docs
just for the license and readme.  They are small enough that they can be
duplicated in the subpackage if necessary IMHO.

(Ideally this change should be made before the F9 alpha freeze.)

[Bug 428623] VLGothic-fonts.noarch is empty

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: VLGothic-fonts.noarch is empty

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428623

------- Additional Comments From [e-mail]  2008-01-14 20:03 EST -------
(In reply to comment #0)
> Description of problem:
> The main VLGothic-fonts package is empty.
> It would be better not to have a file list for it IMHO so it is not generated.

agreed.
> I think it is not really worth having a separate package VLGothic-fonts-docs
> just for the license and readme.  They are small enough that they can be
> duplicated in the subpackage if necessary IMHO.

and the sort of documentations should be provided in each subpackages without
installing any extra packages.

[Bug 428623] too many subpackages?

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: too many subpackages?

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428623

[e-mail] changed:

What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Summary|VLGothic-fonts.noarch is    |too many subpackages?
                   |empty                       |

------- Additional Comments From [e-mail]  2008-01-14 20:45 EST -------
Actually I realised now VLGothic-fonts.noarch is a metapackage.

Still I feel like it would be ok to just keep the main font in VLGothic-fonts
and subpackage the other.

[Bug 428623] too many subpackages?

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: too many subpackages?

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428623

[e-mail] changed:

What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         AssignedTo|ryo-                        |[e-mail]
                   |[e-mail]|
                   |t                           |

[Bug 428623] too many subpackages?

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: too many subpackages?

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428623

[e-mail] changed:

What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         AssignedTo|[e-mail]            |[e-mail]

[Bug 428623] too many subpackages?

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: too many subpackages?

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428623

[e-mail] changed:

What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |CLOSED
         Resolution|                            |RAWHIDE