Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: please drop -tools subpackage for RHEL
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=761409
Summary: please drop -tools subpackage for RHEL Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: Unspecified OS/Version: Unspecified Status: NEW Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Component: fontpackages AssignedTo: nicolas.mailhot@laposte.net ReportedBy: pnemade@redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa@fedoraproject.org CC: tagoh@redhat.com, nicolas.mailhot@laposte.net, fonts-bugs@lists.fedoraproject.org, paul@frixxon.co.uk Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Type: ---
Description of problem: I think on RHEL we don't need -tools subpackage.That pulls fedora-packager package as a dependency also which is not available on RHEL.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
How reproducible:
Steps to Reproduce: 1. 2. 3.
Actual results:
Expected results:
Additional info:
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=761409
--- Comment #1 from Parag pnemade@redhat.com 2011-12-08 04:27:43 EST --- Created attachment 542448 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=542448 this will disable -tools on rhel
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=761409
--- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mailhot@laposte.net 2011-12-12 04:04:16 EST --- would it be possible to conditionnalize only the problematic dep and not the whole tools package ?
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=761409
--- Comment #3 from Bill Nottingham notting@redhat.com 2011-12-12 16:41:28 EST --- Why? We don't use the -tools package in RHEL.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=761409
--- Comment #4 from Parag pnemade@redhat.com 2011-12-21 02:04:17 EST --- nim-nim, Can patch be applied then?
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=761409
Parag pnemade@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(nicolas.mailhot@l | |aposte.net)
--- Comment #5 from Parag pnemade@redhat.com 2011-12-27 00:24:09 EST --- nim-nim, I am trying to understand for what purpose fedora-packager is needed as a dependency in -tools package. Can you help me to understand it?
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=761409
Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mailhot@laposte.net changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(nicolas.mailhot@l | |aposte.net) |
--- Comment #6 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mailhot@laposte.net 2012-01-18 14:53:31 EST --- (In reply to comment #5)
nim-nim, I am trying to understand for what purpose fedora-packager is needed as a dependency in -tools package. Can you help me to understand it?
I think it's only used to compute package owners via /usr/bin/fedoradev-pkgowners in /usr/bin/repo-font-audit
So the correct thing for RHEL is probably to patch this part out without breaking the rest of the script, and remove the dep from the tools subpackage
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=761409
Parag pnemade@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(nicolas.mailhot@l | |aposte.net)
--- Comment #8 from Parag pnemade@redhat.com 2012-01-28 05:12:43 EST --- nim-nim, Is it ok if for RHEL, consolidate function be skipped from repo-font-audit?
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=761409
--- Comment #9 from Akira TAGOH tagoh@redhat.com 2012-02-03 02:58:38 EST --- nim-nim,
That would be nice if you can clarify how providing -tools in RHEL is useful. unfortunately even I have no idea for that.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=761409
--- Comment #10 from Parag pnemade@redhat.com 2012-05-07 02:04:53 EDT --- nim-nim ping
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=761409
--- Comment #11 from Parag pnemade@redhat.com 2012-05-16 00:01:51 EDT --- I tried to remove the call for fedoradev-pkgowners and consolidated output got changed but this resulted in all subsequent test outputs in file to get moved one column left. Its not easy to modify all the script. Better to drop -tools subpackage for RHEL.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=761409
--- Comment #12 from Parag pnemade@redhat.com 2012-05-16 05:01:08 EDT --- nim-nim, I come to conclusion that adding conditional for RHEL to remove -tools is the only good option instead to modify all the parts of the script repo-font-audit. We need to patch spec file.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=761409
Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mailhot@laposte.net changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(nicolas.mailhot@l | |aposte.net) |
--- Comment #13 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mailhot@laposte.net 2012-05-16 06:20:30 EDT --- Can't you just replace the call with something that inserts an empty value ?
That will produce and empty column, but it's good enough to let the rest of the tests run, no?
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=761409
--- Comment #14 from Jens Petersen petersen@redhat.com 2012-05-16 20:44:15 EDT --- Parag, perhaps you can attach your current patch for review/comments?
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=761409
Parag pnemade@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #15 from Parag pnemade@redhat.com 2012-05-16 23:20:22 EDT --- nim-nim, if that is what you like to see then I will prepare a patch for that.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=761409
Parag pnemade@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|please drop -tools |remove fedora-packager |subpackage for RHEL |dependency from -tools in | |RHEL
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=761409
--- Comment #16 from Parag pnemade@redhat.com --- Created attachment 585729 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=585729&action=edit This will remove fedora-packager dependency from -tools subpackage
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=761409
Parag pnemade@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #585729|0 |1 is obsolete| |
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=761409
--- Comment #17 from Parag pnemade@redhat.com --- Created attachment 585761 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=585761&action=edit This will remove fedora-packager dependency from -tools subpackage
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=761409
Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |MODIFIED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=761409
--- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org --- fontpackages-1.44-4.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/fontpackages-1.44-4.fc17
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=761409
Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |ON_QA
--- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org --- Package fontpackages-1.44-4.fc17: * should fix your issue, * was pushed to the Fedora 17 testing repository, * should be available at your local mirror within two days. Update it with: # su -c 'yum update --enablerepo=updates-testing fontpackages-1.44-4.fc17' as soon as you are able to. Please go to the following url: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-8303/fontpackages-1.44-4... then log in and leave karma (feedback).
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=761409
Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed| |2012-06-01 13:04:05
--- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org --- fontpackages-1.44-4.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
fonts-bugs@lists.fedoraproject.org