Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Please rebuild using external Adobe CMap and AGLFN data
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525866
Summary: Please rebuild using external Adobe CMap and AGLFN data Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: fonttools AssignedTo: roozbeh@gmail.com ReportedBy: nicolas.mailhot@laposte.net QAContact: extras-qa@fedoraproject.org CC: tcallawa@redhat.com, roozbeh@gmail.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com Blocks: 182235,473302 Classification: Fedora
Description of problem:
The Debian fonttool packager noticed a problem in fonttool's embedded Adobe CMap and AGLFN data and got Adobe to release them under a good license
Please rebuild the Fedora fonttool using those resources (packaged separately as they can be used by other packages)
FE-LEGAL since this was all triggered by a legal checl Debian-side
See also http://bonedaddy.net/pabs3/log/2009/09/24/adobe-data-freed/ http://lwn.net/Articles/354360/ http://opensource.adobe.com/wiki/display/cmap/CMap+Resources
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525866
Tom "spot" Callaway tcallawa@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|182235(FE-Legal) |
--- Comment #1 from Tom "spot" Callaway tcallawa@redhat.com 2009-10-06 10:45:29 EDT --- I'm not sure why this blocks FE-Legal. There is no reason why this change cannot (and should not) occur. Lifting FE-Legal.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525866
--- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mailhot@laposte.net 2009-10-06 16:09:20 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1)
I'm not sure why this blocks FE-Legal. There is no reason why this change cannot (and should not) occur. Lifting FE-Legal.
Well, it was more "Debian feels not doing this is a legal problem, do we think the same?"
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525866
--- Comment #4 from Bug Zapper triage@lists.fedoraproject.org 2011-06-02 13:40:32 EDT ---
This message is a reminder that Fedora 13 is nearing its end of life. Approximately 30 (thirty) days from now Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora 13. It is Fedora's policy to close all bug reports from releases that are no longer maintained. At that time this bug will be closed as WONTFIX if it remains open with a Fedora 'version' of '13'.
Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, simply change the 'version' to a later Fedora version prior to Fedora 13's end of life.
Bug Reporter: Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we may not be able to fix it before Fedora 13 is end of life. If you would still like to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it against a later version of Fedora please change the 'version' of this bug to the applicable version. If you are unable to change the version, please add a comment here and someone will do it for you.
Although we aim to fix as many bugs as possible during every release's lifetime, sometimes those efforts are overtaken by events. Often a more recent Fedora release includes newer upstream software that fixes bugs or makes them obsolete.
The process we are following is described here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525866
Paul Flo Williams paul@frixxon.co.uk changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |FutureFeature CC| |paul@frixxon.co.uk Version|13 |rawhide Flag|needinfo?(nicolas.mailhot@l | |aposte.net) |
--- Comment #5 from Paul Flo Williams paul@frixxon.co.uk 2011-06-03 03:31:15 EDT --- Rebasing.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525866
Paul Flo Williams paul@frixxon.co.uk changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|roozbeh@gmail.com |pnemade@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525866
Paul Wise (Debian) pabs3@bonedaddy.net changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pabs3@bonedaddy.net
--- Comment #6 from Paul Wise (Debian) pabs3@bonedaddy.net --- Here is the upstream bug about this:
http://sourceforge.net/p/fonttools/bugs/33/
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525866
Parag pnemade@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|--- |CURRENTRELEASE Last Closed| |2015-01-31 11:37:14
--- Comment #7 from Parag pnemade@redhat.com --- I assume we have this fixed already in https://github.com/behdad/fonttools/commit/fea81ee2b3d820cf6beee40fa8ec95a0c...
closing.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525866
--- Comment #8 from Paul Wise (Debian) pabs3@bonedaddy.net --- Incorrect the Google fork of fonttools still contains an embedded copy of the the aglfn data:
https://github.com/behdad/fonttools/Lib/fontTools/agl.py https://github.com/behdad/fonttools/issues/83
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525866
--- Comment #9 from Paul Wise (Debian) pabs3@bonedaddy.net --- That first link should be this instead:
https://github.com/behdad/fonttools/blob/master/Lib/fontTools/agl.py
In addition, the copy in fonttools is outdated compared to upstream.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525866
--- Comment #10 from Paul Wise (Debian) pabs3@bonedaddy.net --- Actually it isn't outdated, but will become so if Adobe ever releases a new version.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525866
Parag pnemade@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|CURRENTRELEASE |--- Keywords| |Reopened
--- Comment #11 from Parag pnemade@redhat.com --- Okay let me open this and I will check this with behdad when he will be back later on.
fonts-bugs@lists.fedoraproject.org