https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1999864
Bug ID: 1999864 Summary: Cannot find package with font for Coptic although such a package exists for Fedora 34 Product: Fedora Version: 34 Status: NEW Component: fontconfig Assignee: tagoh@redhat.com Reporter: mfabian@redhat.com QA Contact: extras-qa@fedoraproject.org CC: ajax@redhat.com, caillon+fedoraproject@gmail.com, fonts-bugs@lists.fedoraproject.org, gnome-sig@lists.fedoraproject.org, i18n-bugs@lists.fedoraproject.org, mclasen@redhat.com, pnemade@redhat.com, rhughes@redhat.com, rstrode@redhat.com, sandmann@redhat.com, tagoh@redhat.com Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora
Created attachment 1819530 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1819530&action=edit Gnome Software unable to find Coptic fonts
Using Fedora-Workstation-Live-x86_64-34-1.2.iso in qemu.
I played with emoji picker and Gnome popped up something requesting more fonts.
I clicked and then Gnome Software said:
“Unable to find the Coptic, Persian, Old (ca. 600-400 B.C.), Ugaritic you were searching for. Please see _the documentation_ for more information.”
See attached screenshot.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1999864
Mike FABIAN mfabian@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mfabian@redhat.com
--- Comment #1 from Mike FABIAN mfabian@redhat.com --- But we have a package with Coptic fonts:
google-noto-sans-coptic-fonts-20201206-2.fc34.noarch
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1999864
--- Comment #2 from Mike FABIAN mfabian@redhat.com --- I am not sure whether this is really a bug in fontconfig, I was just guessing when choosing “Component: fontconfig”.
$ fc-list | grep -i cop /usr/share/fonts/google-noto/NotoSansCoptic-Regular.ttf: Noto Sans Coptic:style=Regular ...
$ rpm -qf /usr/share/fonts/google-noto/NotoSansCoptic-Regular.ttf google-noto-sans-coptic-fonts-20201206-2.fc34.noarch
$ fc-list 'Noto Sans Coptic' family file lang /usr/share/fonts/google-noto/NotoSansCoptic-Regular.ttf: Noto Sans Coptic:lang=
Nothing behind “lang=”
And there is no “cop.orth” file here:
https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/fontconfig/fontconfig/-/tree/main/fc-lang
So “maybe” this has something to do with fontconfig, I am not sure.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1999864
--- Comment #3 from Mike FABIAN mfabian@redhat.com --- Created attachment 1819531 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1819531&action=edit Video showing how to reproduce the Gnome Software “Unable to find the Coptic ...” error
This video shows how the Gnome Software error message
“Unable to to find the Coptic ...”
can be easily reproduced using emoji-picker.
Just open the “No, Number, Other” Unicode category in emoji-picker.
This continues to happen **even if** google-noto-sans-coptic-fonts-20201206-2.fc34.noarch is already installed!
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1999864
--- Comment #4 from Jens Petersen petersen@redhat.com --- Maybe it is because we removed the font lang metadata from fonts packages and we don't have a langpacks for Coptic... hmmm
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1999864
--- Comment #5 from Akira TAGOH tagoh@redhat.com --- What's the locale for Coptic?
If there are any resources or pointer to determine the minimal glyph covarage for Coptic, that would also helps.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1999864
Akira TAGOH tagoh@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags| |needinfo?(mfabian@redhat.co | |m)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1999864
--- Comment #6 from Ben Cotton bcotton@redhat.com --- This message is a reminder that Fedora Linux 34 is nearing its end of life. Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora Linux 34 on 2022-06-07. It is Fedora's policy to close all bug reports from releases that are no longer maintained. At that time this bug will be closed as EOL if it remains open with a 'version' of '34'.
Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, change the 'version' to a later Fedora Linux version.
Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we were not able to fix it before Fedora Linux 34 is end of life. If you would still like to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it against a later version of Fedora Linux, you are encouraged to change the 'version' to a later version prior to this bug being closed.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1999864
Akira TAGOH tagoh@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|34 |35
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1999864
--- Comment #7 from Ben Cotton bcotton@redhat.com --- This message is a reminder that Fedora Linux 35 is nearing its end of life. Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora Linux 35 on 2022-12-13. It is Fedora's policy to close all bug reports from releases that are no longer maintained. At that time this bug will be closed as EOL if it remains open with a 'version' of '35'.
Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, change the 'version' to a later Fedora Linux version.
Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we were not able to fix it before Fedora Linux 35 is end of life. If you would still like to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it against a later version of Fedora Linux, you are encouraged to change the 'version' to a later version prior to this bug being closed.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1999864
Akira TAGOH tagoh@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|35 |rawhide
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1999864
Jens Petersen petersen@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|38 |39
--- Comment #9 from Jens Petersen petersen@redhat.com --- So there is no orth currently for Coptic?
I think the language code is 'cop'.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1999864
Jens Petersen petersen@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Cannot find package with |Cannot find package with |font for Coptic although |font for Coptic although |such a package exists for |package exists in Fedora |Fedora 34 |
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1999864
--- Comment #10 from Jens Petersen petersen@redhat.com --- Btw seems Liberation also has some Coptic coverage.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1999864
--- Comment #11 from Akira TAGOH tagoh@redhat.com --- No, no orth for Coptic. I locally added cop.orth for testing purpose like the following coverage according to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coptic_script:
03E2-03EF # Greek and Coptic 2C80-2CF3 # Coptic 2CF9-2CFF # Coptic
and here is the result: % ./build/fc-validate/fc-validate -l cop /usr/share/fonts/google-noto/NotoSansCoptic-Regular.ttf /usr/share/fonts/google-noto/NotoSansCoptic-Regular.ttf:0 Satisfy the coverage for cop language % ./build/fc-validate/fc-validate -l cop /usr/share/fonts/liberation-sans-fonts/LiberationSans-Regular.ttf /usr/share/fonts/liberation-sans-fonts/LiberationSans-Regular.ttf:0 Missing 123 glyph(s) to satisfy the coverage for cop language
Apparently Liberation doesn't have glyphs in disunification block supported since Unicode 4.1 like defined in the above orth at line number 2 and 3. Although it doesn't closely need to be the same, I don't know what is the minimal requirement to represent Coptic. If the unification code block is good enough, Liberation can satisfies Coptic coverage right.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1999864
Akira TAGOH tagoh@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |FutureFeature Version|39 |rawhide
fonts-bugs@lists.fedoraproject.org