There is a bug for fedora review [1] to add some basic support for font packages. It shouldn't be that hard, but time is limited.
One concern is that font specfiles are hard to parse because of the %_font_pkg macro. The problem is that it "hides" the %files directive which is what we use to locate the section (that we have to parse ourselves instead of using rpm's parser is a long story).
Now, anything is possible. But according to the discussion in [2], fpc nowadays seems very firm about that macros should not include any section parts like %files, so %_font_pkg should most likely not have been approved as-is today (?)
So: should the situation be rectified to comply with fpc's view, probably with a new macro not including %files + deprecating %_font_pkg? Not only for fedora-review (which will have to handle %_font_pkg anyway), but for consistency?
--alec
[1] https://fedorahosted.org/FedoraReview/ticket/215 [2] https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/194