hi Nicolas
I got more feedbacks on the config file testing from Jens, it seems the new config file works fine (the difference between the ja/zh monospace fonts is because ja users use Gothic as default monospace, not the Dejavu Mono).
Do you think if it is ok for me to commit it to F8 as well?
thanks
Qianqian
---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Jens Petersen petersen@redhat.com Date: Dec 12, 2007 2:33 AM Subject: [Fwd: Re: [Fwd: Re: [Fwd: Re: Request for review and advice on wqy-bitmap-fonts fontconfig settings]]] To: Qianqian Fang fangqq@gmail.com
Hi,
Here is a mail from Caius who tried to test your config a bit. I didn't have time yet to review his comments. Does it help at all?
Jens
Hi Jens,
I tested zh_TW.UTF-8 and zh_CN.UTF-8, the monospace fonts are displayed properly.
For ja_JP.UTF-8, the monospace fonts are also displayed properly.
Between ja and zh, the monospace fonts used seems are different. ja is using a narrower width monospace than zh ones (they all monospaced).
Please kindly point out if the info is not what you are inquiring.
Best Regards, Caius.
Jens Petersen さんは書きました:
Caius,
Could you take a look at this please, test the fontconfig file and follow up on the list with your findings.
Thanks,
Jens
Le mercredi 12 décembre 2007 à 14:44 -0500, Qianqian Fang a écrit :
hi Nicolas
Hi,
I got more feedbacks on the config file testing from Jens, it seems the new config file works fine
Do you think if it is ok for me to commit it to F8 as well?
If you pushed the original problem file in F8, you certainly owe a fixed one to F8 users. Me, as long as no one complains, I'm happy.
Regards,
no, I was talking about the new one, 61-wqy-bitmapsong.conf, as I did for devel.
Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
If you pushed the original problem file in F8, you certainly owe a fixed one to F8 users. Me, as long as no one complains, I'm happy.
Regards,