On Fri, 2008-07-25 at 14:06 +0900, mpsuzuki@hiroshima-u.ac.jp wrote:
What is the advantage to pack TrueType and CFF OpenType? I guess, the shareable contents are limited as TTC-packed CFF OpenType, so, such request comes from the people looking for an easy archiver of font files.
Yes, I was just meaning having one file for a face.
On Fri, 2008-07-25 at 10:20 -0400, Behdad Esfahbod wrote:
On Fri, 2008-07-25 at 14:06 +0900, mpsuzuki@hiroshima-u.ac.jp wrote:
What is the advantage to pack TrueType and CFF OpenType? I guess, the shareable contents are limited as TTC-packed CFF OpenType, so, such request comes from the people looking for an easy archiver of font files.
Yes, I was just meaning having one file for a face.
I think a TTC of TT+CFF is going to be seriously evil. But I won't stand in the way of the courageous fool that will try to inject one in the distribution.
Are you sure this is a valid TTC? I thought it can contain only TrueType fonts (possibly with OpenType features).
On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 5:26 PM, Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mailhot@laposte.net wrote:
On Fri, 2008-07-25 at 10:20 -0400, Behdad Esfahbod wrote:
On Fri, 2008-07-25 at 14:06 +0900, mpsuzuki@hiroshima-u.ac.jp wrote:
What is the advantage to pack TrueType and CFF OpenType? I guess, the shareable contents are limited as TTC-packed CFF OpenType, so, such request comes from the people looking for an easy archiver of font files.
Yes, I was just meaning having one file for a face.
I think a TTC of TT+CFF is going to be seriously evil. But I won't stand in the way of the courageous fool that will try to inject one in the distribution.
-- Nicolas Mailhot
Fedora-fonts-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-list
-
Behdad Esfahbod -
Nicolas Mailhot -
Vasile Gaburici