Refering to this bit of older post,
What now the difference between a One-way or Two-Way Trust anyway....? The docs are not too clear abut it:
" Two-way trust enables AD users and groups to access resources in IdM.
However, the two-way trust in IdM does not give the users any additional
rights compared to the one-way trust solution in AD. Both solutions are
considered equally secure because of default cross-forest trust SID
What a use-case for using a Two-Way Trust? (since Windows cannot use IPA as a AD replacement)
Onderwerp: [Freeipa-users] Re: Is IPA-AD two-way trust really two-way?
Datum: Thu, 23 Aug 2018 12:08:17 +0300
On to, 23 elo 2018, Michal Sladek via FreeIPA-users wrote:
I would like to use IPA server in heterogeneous environment with Linux servers and Windows workstations.
IPA domain would be used as a primary source of users and groups.
AD domain would be used for management of Widows hosts only (group policies etc.).
I have setup a test network with two-trust between AD and IPA domain
and realized, that IPA domain sees AD users but AD domain doesn't see
IPA users. Am I missing something or the two-way trust is not two-way
It is two-way in principle. However, FreeIPA does not implement features
required by AD DC to resolve IPA users on Windows workstations. It is on
our long term roadmap.
/ Alexander Bokovoy
Sr. Principal Software Engineer
Security / Identity Management Engineering
Red Hat Limited, Finland
FreeIPA-users mailing list -- email@example.com
To unsubscribe send an email to firstname.lastname@example.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://email@example.com/message/OJCXN7VI2NZAUWUHVZDKEZB7SF72NSR2/