Hi, not sure what might be an issue. Clients in the same network join just fine. The failing client is on another network. The following ports have been allowed: 53, 389, 636, 88, 464 Saw a list somewhere, mentioning 123, 80 and 443. Are these porst nessecary for the client/idm communication?
iirc port 80 and 443 are needed. 123 is for ntp so if you don't sync time from the ipa servers you woudl not need that port.
https://access.redhat.com/solutions/357673
On 3/29/24 13:13, slek kus via FreeIPA-users wrote:
Hi, not sure what might be an issue. Clients in the same network join just fine. The failing client is on another network. The following ports have been allowed: 53, 389, 636, 88, 464 Saw a list somewhere, mentioning 123, 80 and 443. Are these porst nessecary for the client/idm communication? -- _______________________________________________ FreeIPA-users mailing list --freeipa-users@lists.fedorahosted.org To unsubscribe send an email tofreeipa-users-leave@lists.fedorahosted.org Fedora Code of Conduct:https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines:https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives:https://lists.fedorahosted.org/archives/list/freeipa-users@lists.fedorahoste... Do not reply to spam, report it:https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
On Sun, 31 Mar 2024, Antoine Gatineau via FreeIPA-users wrote:
iirc port 80 and 443 are needed. 123 is for ntp so if you don't sync time from the ipa servers you woudl not need that port.
Everything is covered in the documentation:
https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/red_hat_enterprise_linux/9/htm...
https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/red_hat_enterprise_linux/9/htm...
It is best to follow the documentation -- take https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/red_hat_enterprise_linux/9 and check the box 'Identity management' on the left side to limit amount of books to the topics relevant to identity management. Unfortunately, currently this documentation site does not allow pre-select the topics.
Another place to look is this old draft I never managed to turn into a blog or documentation article myself: https://vda.li/drafts/firewall-considerations.txt
It is still valid.
On 3/29/24 13:13, slek kus via FreeIPA-users wrote:
Hi, not sure what might be an issue. Clients in the same network join just fine. The failing client is on another network. The following ports have been allowed: 53, 389, 636, 88, 464 Saw a list somewhere, mentioning 123, 80 and 443. Are these porst nessecary for the client/idm communication? -- _______________________________________________ FreeIPA-users mailing list --freeipa-users@lists.fedorahosted.org To unsubscribe send an email tofreeipa-users-leave@lists.fedorahosted.org Fedora Code of Conduct:https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines:https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives:https://lists.fedorahosted.org/archives/list/freeipa-users@lists.fedorahoste... Do not reply to spam, report it:https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Thanks for the links.. Wasn't sure what was mandatory and what not. Alle works now.
freeipa-users@lists.fedorahosted.org