On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 11:23 AM, David Nalley david@gnsa.us wrote:
on Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 5:57 PM, Max Spevack mspevack@redhat.com wrote:
Today seems like a good day to write this blog post. Interested to hear people's feedback.
http://spevack.livejournal.com/103305.html
--Max
ambassadors mailing list ambassadors@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/ambassadors
I think this is an outstanding idea. I have one comment re the rotating.
So from an outsiders perspective, I infer that there must a lot of internal wrangling that occurs, especially for the larger events such as FUDcon. I suspect that alot of the internal wrangling (and I don't mean to make it sound bad, it's just part of the process, be that budgetary or whatever else) is the reason that the community at large hasn't picked up the responsibility. (And if it isn't, and this is something the community should be picking up, please correct me, I'd hate to think that we want FUDcons and FADs so bad and yet aren't doing the work thats needed if it's something we can do). That leads me to believe that this internal wrangling has a learning curve that is non-trivial, and that repeating it would be a waste of time and resources. If it takes a month to get someone up to speed, having to repeat it for each FUDcon sounds likely to be an excercise in frustration. _______________________________________________ fudcon-planning mailing list fudcon-planning@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fudcon-planning
Even though I am on the outside of RH, as far as planning for the last NA FUDCon stickster and mchua had all their convo in the IRC channel and everything was logged. Even budget talk. And one of the goals of the Events FAD was in my mind to get everything setup so the community could take over the planning, with RH thru the FPL or the designee handling the budget.
Steven