Hi,
I've made the fudcon logo, and I think it's ok now for production.. if anybody has any comments on it, let me know.. because the files are so heave, I've uploaded them to my server, you can download them here: http://www.bdesmet.be/upload/logo.tar.bz2
cheers, Bert Desmet
On 10/24/2009 08:36 AM, bert@devnox.be wrote:
Hi,
I've made the fudcon logo, and I think it's ok now for production.. if anybody has any comments on it, let me know.. because the files are so heave, I've uploaded them to my server, you can download them here: http://www.bdesmet.be/upload/logo.tar.bz2
I love it. Thanks, Bert - they're gorgeous!
Chris, are these files what you need to send the t-shirt order in?
--Mel
On Sat, 2009-10-24 at 14:36 +0200, bert@devnox.be wrote:
Hi,
I've made the fudcon logo, and I think it's ok now for production.. if anybody has any comments on it, let me know.. because the files are so heave, I've uploaded them to my server, you can download them here: http://www.bdesmet.be/upload/logo.tar.bz2
cheers, Bert Desmet
Thanks, Bert! This looks really good.
A couple of general questions about the shirts --
(1)Are the shirts single-sided? (The other tag cloud shirts I've seen have been double-sided, e.g., FUDCon Boston 2009). -- If yes: do you want this image on the front or back? -- If no: what is the image for the other side?
(2) If we do 130 shirts in the same proportions as the current FUDCon pre-registrants, I get roughly:
S 16 M 30 L 32 XL 38 2XL 13 3XL 1
Total 130
Does this look like a reasonable quantity and size breakdown?
-Chris
On Sat, 24 Oct 2009 13:31:27 -0400, Chris Tyler ctyler@fedoraproject.org wrote:
On Sat, 2009-10-24 at 14:36 +0200, bert@devnox.be wrote:
Hi,
I've made the fudcon logo, and I think it's ok now for production.. if anybody has any comments on it, let me know.. because the files are so heave, I've uploaded them to my server, you can download them here: http://www.bdesmet.be/upload/logo.tar.bz2
cheers, Bert Desmet
Thanks, Bert! This looks really good.
A couple of general questions about the shirts --
(1)Are the shirts single-sided? (The other tag cloud shirts I've seen have been double-sided, e.g., FUDCon Boston 2009). -- If yes: do you want this image on the front or back? -- If no: what is the image for the other side?
I think double sided, I'll send you that image tomorow - I have to go now -
(2) If we do 130 shirts in the same proportions as the current FUDCon pre-registrants, I get roughly:
S 16 M 30 L 32 XL 38 2XL 13 3XL 1
Total 130
Does this look like a reasonable quantity and size breakdown?
I think this is quite good, but how about the people that are registred via the school? (I don't know what they get, or won't get, so I'm just asking)
-Chris
fudcon-planning mailing list fudcon-planning@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fudcon-planning
the final version (I hope) :P http://www.bdesmet.be/upload/fudcon_toronto_art.tar.bz2
kind regards, Bert Desmet
On Sat, 24 Oct 2009 19:57:15 +0200, bert@devnox.be wrote:
On Sat, 24 Oct 2009 13:31:27 -0400, Chris Tyler
wrote:
On Sat, 2009-10-24 at 14:36 +0200, bert@devnox.be wrote:
Hi,
I've made the fudcon logo, and I think it's ok now for production.. if anybody has any comments on it, let me know.. because the files are so heave, I've uploaded them to my server, you can download them here: http://www.bdesmet.be/upload/logo.tar.bz2
cheers, Bert Desmet
Thanks, Bert! This looks really good.
A couple of general questions about the shirts --
(1)Are the shirts single-sided? (The other tag cloud shirts I've seen have been double-sided, e.g., FUDCon Boston 2009). -- If yes: do you want this image on the front or back? -- If no: what is the image for the other side?
I think double sided, I'll send you that image tomorow - I have to go
now
(2) If we do 130 shirts in the same proportions as the current FUDCon pre-registrants, I get roughly:
S 16 M 30 L 32 XL 38 2XL 13 3XL 1
Total 130
Does this look like a reasonable quantity and size breakdown?
I think this is quite good, but how about the people that are registred via the school? (I don't know what they get, or won't get, so I'm just asking)
-Chris
fudcon-planning mailing list fudcon-planning@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fudcon-planning
fudcon-planning mailing list fudcon-planning@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fudcon-planning
On Sat, 2009-10-24 at 13:31 -0400, Chris Tyler wrote:
(2) If we do 130 shirts in the same proportions as the current FUDCon pre-registrants, I get roughly:
S 16 M 30 L 32 XL 38 2XL 13 3XL 1
Total 130
Does this look like a reasonable quantity and size breakdown?
I'm dealing with Entripy on the FSOSS shirts and may as well talk to them about FUDCon at the same time. Do we want 130 shirts? Is the breakdown above (based on the percentages already preregistered) reasonable?
-Chris
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 11:21 AM, Chris Tyler ctyler@fedoraproject.org wrote:
On Sat, 2009-10-24 at 13:31 -0400, Chris Tyler wrote:
(2) If we do 130 shirts in the same proportions as the current FUDCon pre-registrants, I get roughly:
S 16 M 30 L 32 XL 38 2XL 13 3XL 1
Total 130
Does this look like a reasonable quantity and size breakdown?
I'm dealing with Entripy on the FSOSS shirts and may as well talk to them about FUDCon at the same time. Do we want 130 shirts? Is the breakdown above (based on the percentages already preregistered) reasonable?
Sounds reasonable to me. By the way -- can they provide long-sleeve T's? I was thinking that would be fitting (ha) given the cold clime. Can you ask Entripy to let us know the cost difference if we wanted to do that (that is, if they offer the option)?
Paul
On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 12:14 PM, Paul Frields stickster@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 11:21 AM, Chris Tyler ctyler@fedoraproject.org wrote:
On Sat, 2009-10-24 at 13:31 -0400, Chris Tyler wrote:
(2) If we do 130 shirts in the same proportions as the current FUDCon pre-registrants, I get roughly:
S 16 M 30 L 32 XL 38 2XL 13 3XL 1
Total 130
Does this look like a reasonable quantity and size breakdown?
I'm dealing with Entripy on the FSOSS shirts and may as well talk to them about FUDCon at the same time. Do we want 130 shirts? Is the breakdown above (based on the percentages already preregistered) reasonable?
Sounds reasonable to me. By the way -- can they provide long-sleeve T's? I was thinking that would be fitting (ha) given the cold clime. Can you ask Entripy to let us know the cost difference if we wanted to do that (that is, if they offer the option)?
Paul
/me likes the idea of long sleeves :)
On Wed, 28 Oct 2009 13:19:37 -0600, Clint Savage herlo1@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 12:14 PM, Paul Frields stickster@gmail.com
wrote:
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 11:21 AM, Chris Tyler
wrote:
On Sat, 2009-10-24 at 13:31 -0400, Chris Tyler wrote:
(2) If we do 130 shirts in the same proportions as the current FUDCon pre-registrants, I get roughly:
S 16 M 30 L 32 XL 38 2XL 13 3XL 1
Total 130
Does this look like a reasonable quantity and size breakdown?
I'm dealing with Entripy on the FSOSS shirts and may as well talk to them about FUDCon at the same time. Do we want 130 shirts? Is the breakdown above (based on the percentages already preregistered) reasonable?
Sounds reasonable to me. By the way -- can they provide long-sleeve T's? I was thinking that would be fitting (ha) given the cold clime. Can you ask Entripy to let us know the cost difference if we wanted to do that (that is, if they offer the option)?
Paul
/me likes the idea of long sleeves :)
I'm in for that idea too =)
fudcon-planning mailing list fudcon-planning@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fudcon-planning
On Thu, 2009-10-29 at 10:38 +0100, bert@devnox.be wrote:
On Wed, 28 Oct 2009 13:19:37 -0600, Clint Savage herlo1@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 12:14 PM, Paul Frields stickster@gmail.com
wrote:
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 11:21 AM, Chris Tyler
wrote:
On Sat, 2009-10-24 at 13:31 -0400, Chris Tyler wrote:
(2) If we do 130 shirts in the same proportions as the current FUDCon pre-registrants, I get roughly:
S 16 M 30 L 32 XL 38 2XL 13 3XL 1 Total 130Does this look like a reasonable quantity and size breakdown?
I'm dealing with Entripy on the FSOSS shirts and may as well talk to them about FUDCon at the same time. Do we want 130 shirts? Is the breakdown above (based on the percentages already preregistered) reasonable?
Sounds reasonable to me. By the way -- can they provide long-sleeve T's? I was thinking that would be fitting (ha) given the cold clime. Can you ask Entripy to let us know the cost difference if we wanted to do that (that is, if they offer the option)?
Paul
/me likes the idea of long sleeves :)
I'm in for that idea too =)
Looks like long sleeves would come to $1490 incl. tax.
We may have a small design issue -- Entripy says that to print that blue on black, they need to base it (print on top of white), and the smallest text in the tag cloud is too small to base. I'm trying to get clarification from them on how small we can go in the tag cloud.
-Chris
2009/10/29 Chris Tyler ctyler@fedoraproject.org:
On Thu, 2009-10-29 at 10:38 +0100, bert@devnox.be wrote:
On Wed, 28 Oct 2009 13:19:37 -0600, Clint Savage herlo1@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 12:14 PM, Paul Frields stickster@gmail.com
wrote:
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 11:21 AM, Chris Tyler
wrote:
On Sat, 2009-10-24 at 13:31 -0400, Chris Tyler wrote:
(2) If we do 130 shirts in the same proportions as the current FUDCon pre-registrants, I get roughly:
S 16 M 30 L 32 XL 38 2XL 13 3XL 1
Total 130
Does this look like a reasonable quantity and size breakdown?
I'm dealing with Entripy on the FSOSS shirts and may as well talk to them about FUDCon at the same time. Do we want 130 shirts? Is the breakdown above (based on the percentages already preregistered) reasonable?
Sounds reasonable to me. By the way -- can they provide long-sleeve T's? I was thinking that would be fitting (ha) given the cold clime. Can you ask Entripy to let us know the cost difference if we wanted to do that (that is, if they offer the option)?
Paul
/me likes the idea of long sleeves :)
I'm in for that idea too =)
Looks like long sleeves would come to $1490 incl. tax.
We may have a small design issue -- Entripy says that to print that blue on black, they need to base it (print on top of white), and the smallest text in the tag cloud is too small to base. I'm trying to get clarification from them on how small we can go in the tag cloud.
Keep in mind i don't know much about this printing process, but what's the chance that white is going to peek out from behind the blue? Or is that the reason for the limit, to ensure there's no bleed.
-Yaakov
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 11:27:05AM +0100, Yaakov Nemoy wrote:
2009/10/29 Chris Tyler ctyler@fedoraproject.org:
On Thu, 2009-10-29 at 10:38 +0100, bert@devnox.be wrote:
On Wed, 28 Oct 2009 13:19:37 -0600, Clint Savage herlo1@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 12:14 PM, Paul Frields stickster@gmail.com
wrote:
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 11:21 AM, Chris Tyler
wrote:
On Sat, 2009-10-24 at 13:31 -0400, Chris Tyler wrote: > (2) If we do 130 shirts in the same proportions as the current FUDCon > pre-registrants, I get roughly: > > S 16 > M 30 > L 32 > XL 38 > 2XL 13 > 3XL 1 > > Total 130 > > Does this look like a reasonable quantity and size breakdown?
I'm dealing with Entripy on the FSOSS shirts and may as well talk to them about FUDCon at the same time. Do we want 130 shirts? Is the breakdown above (based on the percentages already preregistered) reasonable?
Sounds reasonable to me. By the way -- can they provide long-sleeve T's? I was thinking that would be fitting (ha) given the cold clime. Can you ask Entripy to let us know the cost difference if we wanted to do that (that is, if they offer the option)?
Paul
/me likes the idea of long sleeves :)
I'm in for that idea too =)
Looks like long sleeves would come to $1490 incl. tax.
We may have a small design issue -- Entripy says that to print that blue on black, they need to base it (print on top of white), and the smallest text in the tag cloud is too small to base. I'm trying to get clarification from them on how small we can go in the tag cloud.
Keep in mind i don't know much about this printing process, but what's the chance that white is going to peek out from behind the blue? Or is that the reason for the limit, to ensure there's no bleed.
I'm pretty sure it's a bleed/color issue.
So, what's our next action on shirts?
On Tue, 2009-11-03 at 08:59 -0500, Paul W. Frields wrote:
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 11:27:05AM +0100, Yaakov Nemoy wrote:
2009/10/29 Chris Tyler ctyler@fedoraproject.org:
We may have a small design issue -- Entripy says that to print that blue on black, they need to base it (print on top of white), and the smallest text in the tag cloud is too small to base. I'm trying to get clarification from them on how small we can go in the tag cloud.
Keep in mind i don't know much about this printing process, but what's the chance that white is going to peek out from behind the blue? Or is that the reason for the limit, to ensure there's no bleed.
I'm pretty sure it's a bleed/color issue.
Apparently the FUDCon Boston 2009 shirts were base-printed like this too, mine is starting to crack a bit and the white is showing through the blue in a couple of spots.
This is what the folks at Entripy are saying:
On Thu, 2009-10-29 at 11:12 -0400, Kiran Mander wrote:
I just spoke with the graphic manager here and he told me the smallest text we can print with the logo being visible. If you open the back file and look at the bottom right circle where the words Toronto and First are bolded, you can see the word Moss (which is above first). The word Moss is the smallest size we recommend printing the text at to get the best screen print. The word may appear large to you right now, however it only seems like this in relation to the other words because they are so small.
-Chris
On Tue, Nov 03, 2009 at 10:06:48AM -0500, Chris Tyler wrote:
On Tue, 2009-11-03 at 08:59 -0500, Paul W. Frields wrote:
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 11:27:05AM +0100, Yaakov Nemoy wrote:
2009/10/29 Chris Tyler ctyler@fedoraproject.org:
We may have a small design issue -- Entripy says that to print that blue on black, they need to base it (print on top of white), and the smallest text in the tag cloud is too small to base. I'm trying to get clarification from them on how small we can go in the tag cloud.
Keep in mind i don't know much about this printing process, but what's the chance that white is going to peek out from behind the blue? Or is that the reason for the limit, to ensure there's no bleed.
I'm pretty sure it's a bleed/color issue.
Apparently the FUDCon Boston 2009 shirts were base-printed like this too, mine is starting to crack a bit and the white is showing through the blue in a couple of spots.
This is what the folks at Entripy are saying:
On Thu, 2009-10-29 at 11:12 -0400, Kiran Mander wrote:
I just spoke with the graphic manager here and he told me the smallest text we can print with the logo being visible. If you open the back file and look at the bottom right circle where the words Toronto and First are bolded, you can see the word Moss (which is above first). The word Moss is the smallest size we recommend printing the text at to get the best screen print. The word may appear large to you right now, however it only seems like this in relation to the other words because they are so small.
Let me respond to the design ticket and see if anyone knows whether the logo can be reproduced with some different restrictions on size in the "tag clouds."
On Tue, 2009-11-03 at 12:11 -0500, Paul W. Frields wrote:
Chris Tyler wrote:
This is what the folks at Entripy are saying:
On Thu, 2009-10-29 at 11:12 -0400, Kiran Mander wrote:
I just spoke with the graphic manager here and he told me the smallest text we can print with the logo being visible. If you open the back file and look at the bottom right circle where the words Toronto and First are bolded, you can see the word Moss (which is above first). The word Moss is the smallest size we recommend printing the text at to get the best screen print. The word may appear large to you right now, however it only seems like this in relation to the other words because they are so small.
Let me respond to the design ticket and see if anyone knows whether the logo can be reproduced with some different restrictions on size in the "tag clouds."
Bert,
Are you able to upsize the small print?
-Chris
Op dinsdag 10-11-2009 om 17:21 uur [tijdzone -0500], schreef Chris Tyler:
On Tue, 2009-11-03 at 12:11 -0500, Paul W. Frields wrote:
Chris Tyler wrote:
This is what the folks at Entripy are saying:
On Thu, 2009-10-29 at 11:12 -0400, Kiran Mander wrote:
I just spoke with the graphic manager here and he told me the smallest text we can print with the logo being visible. If you open the back file and look at the bottom right circle where the words Toronto and First are bolded, you can see the word Moss (which is above first). The word Moss is the smallest size we recommend printing the text at to get the best screen print. The word may appear large to you right now, however it only seems like this in relation to the other words because they are so small.
Let me respond to the design ticket and see if anyone knows whether the logo can be reproduced with some different restrictions on size in the "tag clouds."
Bert,
Are you able to upsize the small print?
-Chris
srry for the late answer, but I'll try to provide you with those tomorow.. I formatted my computer, and as alwasy, I forgot to back up some things ;-)
so expect them in 14hours or so, going to bed now, and reverse engineer the thing tomorow :)
cheers, Bert
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 12:38:33AM +0100, Bert Desmet wrote:
Op dinsdag 10-11-2009 om 17:21 uur [tijdzone -0500], schreef Chris Tyler:
On Tue, 2009-11-03 at 12:11 -0500, Paul W. Frields wrote:
Chris Tyler wrote:
This is what the folks at Entripy are saying:
On Thu, 2009-10-29 at 11:12 -0400, Kiran Mander wrote:
I just spoke with the graphic manager here and he told me the smallest text we can print with the logo being visible. If you open the back file and look at the bottom right circle where the words Toronto and First are bolded, you can see the word Moss (which is above first). The word Moss is the smallest size we recommend printing the text at to get the best screen print. The word may appear large to you right now, however it only seems like this in relation to the other words because they are so small.
Let me respond to the design ticket and see if anyone knows whether the logo can be reproduced with some different restrictions on size in the "tag clouds."
Bert,
Are you able to upsize the small print?
-Chris
srry for the late answer, but I'll try to provide you with those tomorow.. I formatted my computer, and as alwasy, I forgot to back up some things ;-)
so expect them in 14hours or so, going to bed now, and reverse engineer the thing tomorow :)
Chris, Bert,
Charlie has offered to help us with reproducing a logo for the printer with an appropriate minimum font size. He just needs a list of words from the logo that was previously generated.
Once Bert can produce that list, Charlie can produce the necessary artwork for the printer.
On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 6:37 PM, Paul W. Frields stickster@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 12:38:33AM +0100, Bert Desmet wrote:
Op dinsdag 10-11-2009 om 17:21 uur [tijdzone -0500], schreef Chris Tyler:
On Tue, 2009-11-03 at 12:11 -0500, Paul W. Frields wrote:
Chris Tyler wrote:
This is what the folks at Entripy are saying:
On Thu, 2009-10-29 at 11:12 -0400, Kiran Mander wrote:
I just spoke with the graphic manager here and he told me the smallest text we can print with the logo being visible. If you open the back file and look at the bottom right circle where the words Toronto and First are bolded, you can see the word Moss (which is above first). The word Moss is the smallest size we recommend printing the text at to get the best screen print. The word may appear large to you right now, however it only seems like this in relation to the other words because they are so small.
Let me respond to the design ticket and see if anyone knows whether the logo can be reproduced with some different restrictions on size in the "tag clouds."
Bert,
Are you able to upsize the small print?
-Chris
srry for the late answer, but I'll try to provide you with those tomorow.. I formatted my computer, and as alwasy, I forgot to back up some things ;-)
so expect them in 14hours or so, going to bed now, and reverse engineer the thing tomorow :)
Chris, Bert,
Charlie has offered to help us with reproducing a logo for the printer with an appropriate minimum font size. He just needs a list of words from the logo that was previously generated.
Once Bert can produce that list, Charlie can produce the necessary artwork for the printer.
By the way.. can I buy a small shirt? My kid loves his FudCon boston shirt and I need to get him a new one.
Sorry it took so long, but I have allot of work atm :(
I have included the list, and I think youĺl understand how to work with it :) I would be happy if you let all the words in it, I know the last words of each row are a bit weird or so.. but that's just my Belgian humor ;-)
cheers, Bert
Op woensdag 11-11-2009 om 11:37 uur [tijdzone +1000], schreef Paul W. Frields:
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 12:38:33AM +0100, Bert Desmet wrote:
Op dinsdag 10-11-2009 om 17:21 uur [tijdzone -0500], schreef Chris Tyler:
On Tue, 2009-11-03 at 12:11 -0500, Paul W. Frields wrote:
Chris Tyler wrote:
This is what the folks at Entripy are saying:
On Thu, 2009-10-29 at 11:12 -0400, Kiran Mander wrote:
I just spoke with the graphic manager here and he told me the smallest text we can print with the logo being visible. If you open the back file and look at the bottom right circle where the words Toronto and First are bolded, you can see the word Moss (which is above first). The word Moss is the smallest size we recommend printing the text at to get the best screen print. The word may appear large to you right now, however it only seems like this in relation to the other words because they are so small.
Let me respond to the design ticket and see if anyone knows whether the logo can be reproduced with some different restrictions on size in the "tag clouds."
Bert,
Are you able to upsize the small print?
-Chris
srry for the late answer, but I'll try to provide you with those tomorow.. I formatted my computer, and as alwasy, I forgot to back up some things ;-)
so expect them in 14hours or so, going to bed now, and reverse engineer the thing tomorow :)
Chris, Bert,
Charlie has offered to help us with reproducing a logo for the printer with an appropriate minimum font size. He just needs a list of words from the logo that was previously generated.
Once Bert can produce that list, Charlie can produce the necessary artwork for the printer.
On 11/11/09 22:20, Bert Desmet wrote:
Sorry it took so long, but I have allot of work atm :(
I have included the list, and I think youĺl understand how to work with it :) I would be happy if you let all the words in it, I know the last words of each row are a bit weird or so.. but that's just my Belgian humor ;-)
cheers, Bert
Thanks Bert.
What minimum font should be set?
http://www.cs.manchester.ac.uk/~brejc8/temp/final4.svg http://www.cs.manchester.ac.uk/~brejc8/temp/final5.svg http://www.cs.manchester.ac.uk/~brejc8/temp/final6.svg http://www.cs.manchester.ac.uk/~brejc8/temp/final7.svg
These are the words I used. What changes are needed? Avoid long sentences as these need a too small a font to fit in.
# Words for the NE leaf CON freedom pitchtalk "open source" "North America" moblin T.O. "Mirroring Fedora for fun and Profit" linux starter ovirt gnome "Fort Rouill" "The city within a park" "Little Norway Park" "Toronto eaton centre" hm..
# Words for the SW leaf Toronto first keynotes fudbus Moss "Ontario Place" "Designing in inkscape" hogtown xfce experts "Victoria Park Avenue" "Humber River" eh? >SW.svg &
# Words for the NW leaf FUD Friends Techtalk FUDpub "Seneca@York campus" olpc "Big Smoke" "Royal Ontario Museum" teaching mirror packaging lxde "Fedora Electronic Lab" "Don River" "Toronto the Good" JBoss SIG "ah!"
# Words for the SE leaf 2009 features hackfest skating "Seneca College" "St. Lawrence Market" omege "CN tower" "GIT for Developers" free sound lvm kde "distillery district" "the Queen City" "Diversity Our Strength" "Art Gallery of Ontario" "oh!"
If anyone wants to have a play I can supply the script that generates these.
On Wed, 11 Nov 2009 23:02:22 +0000, Charlie Brej fudcon@brej.org wrote:
On 11/11/09 22:20, Bert Desmet wrote:
Sorry it took so long, but I have allot of work atm :(
I have included the list, and I think youĺl understand how to work
with
it :) I would be happy if you let all the words in it, I know the
last
words of each row are a bit weird or so.. but that's just my Belgian humor ;-)
cheers, Bert
Thanks Bert.
What minimum font should be set?
http://www.cs.manchester.ac.uk/~brejc8/temp/final4.svg http://www.cs.manchester.ac.uk/~brejc8/temp/final5.svg http://www.cs.manchester.ac.uk/~brejc8/temp/final6.svg http://www.cs.manchester.ac.uk/~brejc8/temp/final7.svg
don't forget to manually overrun them to get some 'errors' or overlapping text out of them :)
These are the words I used. What changes are needed? Avoid long
sentences
as these need a too small a font to fit in.
# Words for the NE leafCON freedom pitchtalk "open source" "North America" moblin T.O.
"Mirroring
Fedora for fun and Profit" linux starter ovirt gnome "Fort Rouill" "The city within a park" "Little Norway Park" "Toronto eaton centre" hm..
# Words for the SW leafToronto first keynotes fudbus Moss "Ontario Place" "Designing in
inkscape"
hogtown xfce experts "Victoria Park Avenue" "Humber River" eh? >SW.svg &
# Words for the NW leafFUD Friends Techtalk FUDpub "Seneca@York campus" olpc "Big Smoke"
"Royal
Ontario Museum" teaching mirror packaging lxde "Fedora Electronic Lab" "Don River" "Toronto the Good" JBoss SIG "ah!"
# Words for the SE leaf2009 features hackfest skating "Seneca College" "St. Lawrence Market" omege "CN tower" "GIT for Developers" free sound lvm kde "distillery district"
"the
Queen City" "Diversity Our Strength" "Art Gallery of Ontario" "oh!"
If anyone wants to have a play I can supply the script that generates these. _______________________________________________ fudcon-planning mailing list fudcon-planning@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fudcon-planning
On Wed, 2009-11-11 at 23:02 +0000, Charlie Brej wrote:
On 11/11/09 22:20, Bert Desmet wrote:
Sorry it took so long, but I have allot of work atm :(
I have included the list, and I think youĺl understand how to work with it :) I would be happy if you let all the words in it, I know the last words of each row are a bit weird or so.. but that's just my Belgian humor ;-)
cheers, Bert
Thanks Bert.
What minimum font should be set?
http://www.cs.manchester.ac.uk/~brejc8/temp/final4.svg http://www.cs.manchester.ac.uk/~brejc8/temp/final5.svg http://www.cs.manchester.ac.uk/~brejc8/temp/final6.svg http://www.cs.manchester.ac.uk/~brejc8/temp/final7.svg
These are the words I used. What changes are needed? Avoid long sentences as these need a too small a font to fit in.
# Words for the NE leafCON freedom pitchtalk "open source" "North America" moblin T.O. "Mirroring Fedora for fun and Profit" linux starter ovirt gnome "Fort Rouill" "The city within a park" "Little Norway Park" "Toronto eaton centre" hm..
# Words for the SW leafToronto first keynotes fudbus Moss "Ontario Place" "Designing in inkscape" hogtown xfce experts "Victoria Park Avenue" "Humber River" eh? >SW.svg &
# Words for the NW leafFUD Friends Techtalk FUDpub "Seneca@York campus" olpc "Big Smoke" "Royal Ontario Museum" teaching mirror packaging lxde "Fedora Electronic Lab" "Don River" "Toronto the Good" JBoss SIG "ah!"
# Words for the SE leaf2009 features hackfest skating "Seneca College" "St. Lawrence Market" omege "CN tower" "GIT for Developers" free sound lvm kde "distillery district" "the Queen City" "Diversity Our Strength" "Art Gallery of Ontario" "oh!"
If anyone wants to have a play I can supply the script that generates these.
Thank you, Bert and Charlie! I sent one of the files off to Entripy to test text sizes.
If you need some more short words:
# Related to sessions: CDOT sugar PyGTK Eclipse Mockup Design Eye SELinux Sandbox Puppet DXR Dehydra panel lawyering yum metrics AMPQ Qpid kernel AutoQA FAS edge SystemTap GDB replication Zikula No Frozen Rawhide Fedora Mini Town Hall
# Related to location: TTC Viva Interchange YYZ D&B "Nathan Phillips Square" # Ok, not so short NPS skating Vaughan York
-- Chris
On Fri, 2009-11-20 at 00:28 +0000, Charlie Brej wrote:
On 14/11/09 18:59, Chris Tyler wrote:
Thank you, Bert and Charlie! I sent one of the files off to Entripy to test text sizes.
Have you had a reply yet? When is the submission deadline?
Good news! Late today I got word that Entripy can run the original design using a "double screen". I'm going to visit them on Monday to hash out the details. If there are any final changes to the design, please let me know.
-Chris
On 20/11/09 00:45, Chris Tyler wrote:
On Fri, 2009-11-20 at 00:28 +0000, Charlie Brej wrote:
On 14/11/09 18:59, Chris Tyler wrote:
Thank you, Bert and Charlie! I sent one of the files off to Entripy to test text sizes.
Have you had a reply yet? When is the submission deadline?
Good news! Late today I got word that Entripy can run the original design using a "double screen". I'm going to visit them on Monday to hash out the details. If there are any final changes to the design, please let me know.
-Chris
In that case the original design should be fine, unless you want to change the words.
On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 10:56:29AM +0000, Charlie Brej wrote:
On 20/11/09 00:45, Chris Tyler wrote:
On Fri, 2009-11-20 at 00:28 +0000, Charlie Brej wrote:
On 14/11/09 18:59, Chris Tyler wrote:
Thank you, Bert and Charlie! I sent one of the files off to Entripy to test text sizes.
Have you had a reply yet? When is the submission deadline?
Good news! Late today I got word that Entripy can run the original design using a "double screen". I'm going to visit them on Monday to hash out the details. If there are any final changes to the design, please let me know.
-Chris
In that case the original design should be fine, unless you want to change the words.
If Entripy can run the original design using the font sizes there, no reason to worry about a change. Does that work, Chris?
On Fri, 2009-11-20 at 10:28 -0500, Paul W. Frields wrote:
On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 10:56:29AM +0000, Charlie Brej wrote:
On 20/11/09 00:45, Chris Tyler wrote:
On Fri, 2009-11-20 at 00:28 +0000, Charlie Brej wrote:
On 14/11/09 18:59, Chris Tyler wrote:
Thank you, Bert and Charlie! I sent one of the files off to Entripy to test text sizes.
Have you had a reply yet? When is the submission deadline?
Good news! Late today I got word that Entripy can run the original design using a "double screen". I'm going to visit them on Monday to hash out the details. If there are any final changes to the design, please let me know.
-Chris
In that case the original design should be fine, unless you want to change the words.
If Entripy can run the original design using the font sizes there, no reason to worry about a change. Does that work, Chris?
Sounds like a good plan.
-Chris
fudcon-planning@lists.fedoraproject.org
-
Bert Desmet -
Charlie Brej -
Chris Tyler -
Clint Savage -
Mel Chua -
Paul W. Frields -
Stephen John Smoogen -
Yaakov Nemoy