These were IMHO used for Transifex purpose. For us I think these lists
are more and less useless. IMHO we need governance list for issues,
one for translation (we have it - trans fpo), one for i18n for sure -
but do we need that much?

Zoltan

2016-08-25 8:35 GMT+02:00 pravin.d.s@gmail.com <pravin.d.s@gmail.com>:
>
>
> On 25 August 2016 at 12:00, Jean-Baptiste Holcroft
> <jean-baptiste@holcroft.fr> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> can you please tell us what are the goald of those FAS group ?
>>
>> Translation CVS Commit Group (cvsl10n) -> Karsten Wade kwade@redhat.com
>>
>> l10n Commit Group (l10n-commits) -> Dimitris Glezos dimitris@glezos.com
>>
>> l10n Admin Group (l10n-admin) ->Dimitris Glezos dimitris@glezos.com
>>
>> Localization (L10n) Editors (l10n-editor) -> Diego Búrigo Zacarão
>> diegobz@gmail.com
>>
>>
>> if no answer in the next weeks, I will assume they are not in use anymore.
>>
>
> Perfect !!
> * If groups are useful, we will change Admins.
> * If groups not useful, simply disable/deactivate it.
>
> Thanks,
> Pravin
>

> _______________________________________________
> g11n mailing list
> g11n@lists.fedoraproject.org
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/g11n@lists.fedoraproject.org
>



--
PGP:  06853DF7

_______________________________________________
g11n mailing list
g11n@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/g11n@lists.fedoraproject.org