These were IMHO used for Transifex purpose. For us I think these lists
are more and less useless. IMHO we need governance list for issues,
one for translation (we have it - trans fpo), one for i18n for sure -
but do we need that much?
2016-08-25 8:35 GMT+02:00 firstname.lastname@example.org <email@example.com>:
> On 25 August 2016 at 12:00, Jean-Baptiste Holcroft
> <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
>> can you please tell us what are the goald of those FAS group ?
>> Translation CVS Commit Group (cvsl10n) -> Karsten Wade email@example.com
>> l10n Commit Group (l10n-commits) -> Dimitris Glezos firstname.lastname@example.org
>> l10n Admin Group (l10n-admin) ->Dimitris Glezos email@example.com
>> Localization (L10n) Editors (l10n-editor) -> Diego Búrigo Zacarão
>> if no answer in the next weeks, I will assume they are not in use anymore.
> Perfect !!
> * If groups are useful, we will change Admins.
> * If groups not useful, simply disable/deactivate it.
> g11n mailing list
g11n mailing list