Fedora Globalization FAD first day report

Hi All,

For members who wanted to be part of this FAD but not able to do it.
  Brief Report for day 1
http://fedoramagazine.org/globalization-test-days-report-fedora-23/.

Regards,
Pravin Satpute

[Ani Peter]

Here is the correct link for G11n FAD DAY 1 Report [1].

Thanks
Ani

[1] - 
http://pravin-s.blogspot.jp/2015/11/globalization-fedora-activity-day-1.html

On 11/01/2015 09:51 PM, [e-mail] wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> For members who wanted to be part of this FAD but not able to do it.
>   Brief Report for day 1 
> http://fedoramagazine.org/globalization-test-days-report-fedora-23/.
>
> Regards,
> Pravin Satpute
>
> g11n mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/g11n
>
> --
> trans mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/trans

[Pravin Satpute]

On Monday 02 November 2015 11:01 AM, Ani Peter wrote:
> Here is the correct link for G11n FAD DAY 1 Report [1].

Thanks Ani for correcting it.

Regards,
Pravin Satpute
> Thanks
> Ani
>
> [1] -
> http://pravin-s.blogspot.jp/2015/11/globalization-fedora-activity-day-1.html
>
> On 11/01/2015 09:51 PM, [e-mail] wrote:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > For members who wanted to be part of this FAD but not able to do it.
> >   Brief Report for day 1
> > http://fedoramagazine.org/globalization-test-days-report-fedora-23/.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Pravin Satpute
> >
> > g11n mailing list
> > [e-mail]
> > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/g11n
> >
> > --
> > trans mailing list
> > [e-mail]
> > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/trans
>
> g11n mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/g11n

[shankar prasad]

Hi,

Good to see Fedora Globalization meetup is happening!

Did you guys discuss the poor state of Fedora Indic L10n? In Pravin's blog
I did not see any mention about the current L10n status of Indic Language.

I have been contributing to Fedora since past 9 years. In the last couple
of years, I observed that Indic contributors are gradually moving away from
it. Did we discuss, why Fedora is getting less attractive with respect to
Indic L10n? Is Fedora is not doing much to get the Indian volunteers for
L10n? Is popularity also counts here?

I think we need to introspect on these lines if we are interested to grow
the number contributors for Indic Languages. If the Indian Languages are
not of priority, then please ignore this.

Thanks
Shankar

On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 12:55 PM, Pravin Satpute 
wrote:
> On Monday 02 November 2015 11:01 AM, Ani Peter wrote:
>
> Here is the correct link for G11n FAD DAY 1 Report [1].
>
> Thanks Ani for correcting it.
>
> Regards,
> Pravin Satpute
>
> Thanks
> Ani
>
> [1] -
> http://pravin-s.blogspot.jp/2015/11/globalization-fedora-activity-day-1.html
>
> On 11/01/2015 09:51 PM, [e-mail] wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> For members who wanted to be part of this FAD but not able to do it.
>   Brief Report for day 1
> http://fedoramagazine.org/globalization-test-days-report-fedora-23/.
>
> Regards,
> Pravin Satpute
>
> g11n mailing [e-mail]://lists.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/g11n
>
> --
> trans mailing [e-mail]://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/trans
>
> g11n mailing [e-mail]://lists.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/g11n
>
> g11n mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/g11n
>
> --
> trans mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/trans

On 3 November 2015 at 03:18, shankar prasad  wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Good to see Fedora Globalization meetup is happening!
>
> Did you guys discuss the poor state of Fedora Indic L10n? In Pravin's blog
> I did not see any mention about the current L10n status of Indic Language.

Yes, we did.

Blog not mentioning anything specific on Indic, since we actually worked on
global strategy for all languages.
> I have been contributing to Fedora since past 9 years. In the last couple
> of years, I observed that Indic contributors are gradually moving away from
> it. Did we discuss, why Fedora is getting less attractive with respect to
> Indic L10n? Is Fedora is not doing much to get the Indian volunteers for
> L10n? Is popularity also counts here?

Yeah, you spotted exactly.
Trying to improve it from Fedora 24 onwards. Have big todo list for F24,
hoping it will improve this situation as well.
> I think we need to introspect on these lines if we are interested to grow
> the number contributors for Indic Languages.

Being one of the long time contributor to Fedora L10N, i think your inputs
will be very helpful to improve this situation. We already have some plans
in hand. Lets discuss further on this in FUEL conference.
> If the Indian Languages are not of priority, then please ignore this.

Fedora does not decide priority for any language rather languages
contributor/community decide priorities for Fedora :)
I hope more Indian language contributors will come up soon and help to
improve this situation.

Regards,
Pravin Satpute