Fedora Games SIG

games@lists.fedoraproject.org

1 participants
713 discussions

[Bug 2379721] Review Request: openmw - OpenMW is an open-source game engine
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 13 Jul '25

13 Jul '25

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2379721 --- Comment #7 from Claire Robsahm <inquiries(a)chapien.net> --- Forgot that I needed desktop utils to do desktop-file-validate. Sorry. SPEC URL: https://git.chapien.net/chapien/openmw-rpm/raw/branch/main/openmw.spec SRPM URL: https://git.chapien.net/chapien/openmw-rpm/raw/branch/main/SRPMS/openmw-0.4… [fedora-review-service] -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2379721 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…

1 0

[Bug 2379721] Review Request: openmw - OpenMW is an open-source game engine
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 12 Jul '25

12 Jul '25

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2379721 --- Comment #6 from Claire Robsahm <inquiries(a)chapien.net> --- Ran the review service and found some problems myself. Fixed up my License expression, and I also now run desktop-file-validate appropriately. SPEC URL: https://git.chapien.net/chapien/openmw-rpm/raw/branch/main/openmw.spec SRPM URL: https://git.chapien.net/chapien/openmw-rpm/raw/branch/main/SRPMS/openmw-0.4… [fedora-review-service] (hopefully I did that right) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2379721 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…

1 0

[Bug 2379721] Review Request: openmw - OpenMW is an open-source game engine
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 12 Jul '25

12 Jul '25

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2379721 --- Comment #5 from Claire Robsahm <inquiries(a)chapien.net> --- (In reply to Artur Frenszek-Iwicki from comment #4) > > Understood. Do I list each license on a separate line? > Putting multiple "License: XXX" tags on a single package is invalid > and will cause rpmbuild to refuse to build the package and exit with an > error, > so the licences must all go in a single "License: XXX and YYY..." tag. > (Unless you're building multiple packages from the same spec file, > in which case each sub-package can have a different licence tag.) > > That being said, standard practice is to also put a comment explaining the > licensing breakdown. > You should end up with something like: > > # Most of the code is subject to license XXX. > # - src/linked_list.c is licensed under YYY > # Statically linked library "qwerty" is ZZZ. > License: XXX and YYY and ZZZ Fixed. I also switched to using %autorelease, I was using manual build numbers for my own testing. SPEC URL: https://git.chapien.net/chapien/openmw-rpm/raw/branch/main/openmw.spec SRPM URL: https://git.chapien.net/chapien/openmw-rpm/raw/branch/main/SRPMS/openmw-0.4… -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2379721 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…

1 0

[Bug 2379721] Review Request: openmw - OpenMW is an open-source game engine
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 12 Jul '25

12 Jul '25

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2379721 Artur Frenszek-Iwicki <fedora(a)svgames.pl> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora(a)svgames.pl --- Comment #4 from Artur Frenszek-Iwicki <fedora(a)svgames.pl> --- > Understood. Do I list each license on a separate line? Putting multiple "License: XXX" tags on a single package is invalid and will cause rpmbuild to refuse to build the package and exit with an error, so the licences must all go in a single "License: XXX and YYY..." tag. (Unless you're building multiple packages from the same spec file, in which case each sub-package can have a different licence tag.) That being said, standard practice is to also put a comment explaining the licensing breakdown. You should end up with something like: # Most of the code is subject to license XXX. # - src/linked_list.c is licensed under YYY # Statically linked library "qwerty" is ZZZ. License: XXX and YYY and ZZZ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2379721 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…

1 0

[Bug 2379721] Review Request: openmw - OpenMW is an open-source game engine
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 12 Jul '25

12 Jul '25

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2379721 --- Comment #3 from Claire Robsahm <inquiries(a)chapien.net> --- Updated, using the licenses all on one line for now, let me know if that is not appropriate. Spec URL: https://git.chapien.net/chapien/openmw-rpm/raw/branch/main/openmw.spec SRPM URL: https://git.chapien.net/chapien/openmw-rpm/raw/branch/main/SRPMS/openmw-0.4… -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2379721 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…

1 0

[Bug 2379721] Review Request: openmw - OpenMW is an open-source game engine
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 12 Jul '25

12 Jul '25

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2379721 --- Comment #2 from Claire Robsahm <inquiries(a)chapien.net> --- (In reply to Peter Lemenkov from comment #1) > Thanks for this contribution, but I have something to say. > > 1st of all remove all mentions of a trademarked software. E.g. use something > like this: > > "OpenMW is an open-source game engine based on a well-known game." > > "OpenMW-CS is a replacement for a well-known Construction Set" > > 2nd. I'm sure License field needs some clarification. I am certain it's not > just "GPL-3.0-only". It should also mention a License for OpenSceneGraph > fork. Our copy is licensed under "GPL-2.0-or-later WITH > WxWindows-exception-3.1". Also bulletphysics is licensed under "Zlib". > Please double-check that all licenses are mentioned properly. Understood. Do I list each license on a separate line? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2379721 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…

1 0

[Bug 2379721] Review Request: openmw - OpenMW is an open-source game engine
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 12 Jul '25

12 Jul '25

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2379721 --- Comment #1 from Peter Lemenkov <lemenkov(a)gmail.com> --- Thanks for this contribution, but I have something to say. 1st of all remove all mentions of a trademarked software. E.g. use something like this: "OpenMW is an open-source game engine based on a well-known game." "OpenMW-CS is a replacement for a well-known Construction Set" 2nd. I'm sure License field needs some clarification. I am certain it's not just "GPL-3.0-only". It should also mention a License for OpenSceneGraph fork. Our copy is licensed under "GPL-2.0-or-later WITH WxWindows-exception-3.1". Also bulletphysics is licensed under "Zlib". Please double-check that all licenses are mentioned properly. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2379721 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…

1 0

[Bug 2379721] Review Request: openmw - OpenMW is an open-source game engine
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 12 Jul '25

12 Jul '25

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2379721 Claire Robsahm <inquiries(a)chapien.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment|0 |updated --- Comment #0 has been edited --- Spec URL: https://git.chapien.net/chapien/openmw-rpm/raw/branch/main/openmw.spec SRPM URL: https://git.chapien.net/chapien/openmw-rpm/raw/branch/main/SRPMS/openmw-0.4… Description: OpenMW is an open-source game engine based on Bethesda's Elder Scrolls III Morrowind. Fedora Account System Username: chapien Some details on the package, since I'm sure there will be questions in this area. First, what is openMW? OpenMW is a game engine. Originally, it was made to play the proprietary video game "Elder Scrolls III Morrowind" on Linux and other non-Windows platforms natively. It evolved into an entire engine replacement project, making it the preferred way to play the game even on Windows. This would imply that the game requires proprietary data to run. However, this is no longer the case. OpenMW has evolved into an entire game engine in its own right. Game projects have been created in openmw-cs (the construction set), requiring absolutely no proprietary code or assets from the original Morrowind. Upstream provides sample data files that can substitute Morrowind's, allowing the launcher to function even without Morrowind itself. Of course, the engine is still primarily used to run Morrowind at this time, but like another package we include, Stratagus, it can do more. Upstream's website: https://openmw.org/ Next, I want to pre-emptively explain some of the decisions made in the build process. I am statically linking three libraries, and for good reason. First, I am statically linking bullet3, a library we do provide. This is because openMW requires bullet to be built with Double Precision, and our own package is built with float precision. I was advised by the bullet3 Fedora maintainers that statically linking would be appropriate in this use-case. Second, I am statically linking OpenSceneGraph, a package we do provide. Upstream (openMW) has their own fork of OpenSceneGraph, which provides optimizations and improved framerate for openMW specifically. Statically linking their version of OSG simply made sense to me. The repo is here: https://github.com/OpenMW/osg Finally, RecastNavigation is something we do not package; Godot Engine, a package we do provide, seems to statically link RecastNavigation as well, so there is precedent. In addition, by default OpenMW statically links Recast rather than dynamically, which implies to me that this is preferred by upstream. Let me know if there are further questions and feedback! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2379721

1 0

[Bug 2379721] Review Request: openmw - OpenMW is an open-source game engine
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 12 Jul '25

12 Jul '25

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2379721 Claire Robsahm <inquiries(a)chapien.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |games(a)lists.fedoraproject.o | |rg -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2379721

1 0

[Bug 1364745] Games SIG tracker bug
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 11 Jul '25

11 Jul '25

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1364745 Bug 1364745 depends on bug 2371328, which changed state. Bug 2371328 Summary: Review Request: mygui - Unretire mygui with newest version for f41+ https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2371328 What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1364745

1 0

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

Fedora Games SIG