Hello friends,
I am a chess player from Finland and have operated many years with Fedora. My last system is Fedora 14 x86_64 and I have been very satisfied to it. But I have noticed that Fedora has only gnuchess and something other chess program.
Have you plans to publish official chess programs for e. Scid and Stockfish? These programs are modern and efficient programs and have published in many other Linux systems. But why not in Fedora?
Best regards, Olavi Halme
Olavi Halme wrote:
Hello friends,
I am a chess player from Finland and have operated many years with Fedora. My last system is Fedora 14 x86_64 and I have been very satisfied to it. But I have noticed that Fedora has only gnuchess and something other chess program.
Have you plans to publish official chess programs for e. Scid and Stockfish? These programs are modern and efficient programs and have published in many other Linux systems. But why not in Fedora?
Best regards, Olavi Halme
games mailing list games@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/games
I suspect that the sets of people who know about and are interested in these games, and those who package for Fedora, have not yet overlapped. If you can provide me URLs, I will take a look and possibly package them.
Thanks, J
Jon Ciesla wrote:
Olavi Halme wrote:
Hello friends,
I am a chess player from Finland and have operated many years with Fedora. My last system is Fedora 14 x86_64 and I have been very satisfied to it. But I have noticed that Fedora has only gnuchess and something other chess program.
Have you plans to publish official chess programs for e. Scid and Stockfish? These programs are modern and efficient programs and have published in many other Linux systems. But why not in Fedora?
Best regards, Olavi Halme
games mailing list games@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/games
I suspect that the sets of people who know about and are interested in these games, and those who package for Fedora, have not yet overlapped. If you can provide me URLs, I will take a look and possibly package them.
Thanks, J
Can someone else on the list forward my reply? Olavi's email server won't accept email from my IP, despite it being on a business-class DSL static IP <grumble>
-J
On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 09:35:56 +0200, Olavi Halme omhalme64@kolumbus.fi wrote:
Hello friends,
I am a chess player from Finland and have operated many years with Fedora. My last system is Fedora 14 x86_64 and I have been very satisfied to it. But I have noticed that Fedora has only gnuchess and something other chess program.
'chess' is completely broken after F14. Upstream is dead and it needs to be updated for more recent cegui and ogre. I still hope to do that, but I haven't had time to work on it for quite a while.
'pychess' was recently orphaned, but might get picked up again.
'knights' is a fairly recent addition.
There could be other ones I am not aware of.
I don't play much chess, so I don't have recommendations for how any of these fare against each other.
Be aware that Fedora only includes 'free' (freedom) software. Programs that are commercial or free for noncommercial use, are not 'free' even if there is no charge for them and will not be included in Fedora.
Hi,
Install gnome-games-extra, that one has glchess, which is quite nice, note that you can enable a 3d view (if you prefer) from the menus.
Regards,
Hans
On 03/24/2011 04:21 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 09:35:56 +0200, Olavi Halmeomhalme64@kolumbus.fi wrote:
Hello friends,
I am a chess player from Finland and have operated many years with Fedora. My last system is Fedora 14 x86_64 and I have been very satisfied to it. But I have noticed that Fedora has only gnuchess and something other chess program.
'chess' is completely broken after F14. Upstream is dead and it needs to be updated for more recent cegui and ogre. I still hope to do that, but I haven't had time to work on it for quite a while.
'pychess' was recently orphaned, but might get picked up again.
'knights' is a fairly recent addition.
There could be other ones I am not aware of.
I don't play much chess, so I don't have recommendations for how any of these fare against each other.
Be aware that Fedora only includes 'free' (freedom) software. Programs that are commercial or free for noncommercial use, are not 'free' even if there is no charge for them and will not be included in Fedora. _______________________________________________ games mailing list games@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/games
On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 2:35 AM, Olavi Halme omhalme64@kolumbus.fi wrote:
Have you plans to publish official chess programs for e. Scid and Stockfish? These programs are modern and efficient programs and have published in many other Linux systems. But why not in Fedora?
For those who don't know, since chess is such a well defined and universal game, basically all computer chess programs are divided into seperate UI and engine processes, communicating with a standard protocol. In fact, most engine developers don't bother writing GUIs at all, and vice versa, so you have to mix and match.
There are two protocols in use, "Xboard/Winboard/Chess Engine Communication Protocol", which is basically just GNU Chess's text interface, which has been around a long time and is widely supported in the open source world, but is a bit hacky having not been designed to be a universal standard in the first place. Then there's UCI, a newer better protocol, which does not yet seem to be widely supported in the open source world. We don't seem to have anything supporting it in Fedora yet, however a Xboard/UCI adapter exists:
http://wbec-ridderkerk.nl/html/details1/PolyGlot.html
Stockfish is generally considered the strongest open source engine right now, and is a UCI engine, and Scid is an open source "chess database" that apparently also acts as an Xboard/UCI GUI. Getting Scid into the distribution is probably a good start.
I'm completely terrible at chess, I'm lucky if I can beat GNU chess on gnome chess's easy setting (only look two moves ahead) so I have not had a burning desire to get any strong engines into the distribution... :)