There is a new version of supertux out. The announcement is here:
http://lists.berlios.de/pipermail/supertux-devel/2006-December/001338.html
You should be able to install it from extras-development now. (It installs fine on FC6 for me.) Upstream doesn't consider this a "stable" release, but if it seems to be working well for everyone, I'm tempted to push an update for FC6.
Feedback appreciated on this bug:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220665
Steve
Steven Pritchard wrote:
There is a new version of supertux out. The announcement is here:
http://lists.berlios.de/pipermail/supertux-devel/2006-December/001338.html
You should be able to install it from extras-development now. (It installs fine on FC6 for me.) Upstream doesn't consider this a "stable" release, but if it seems to be working well for everyone, I'm tempted to push an update for FC6.
Feedback appreciated on this bug:
As I just wrote in bugzilla, I would avoid upgrading this for FC6 if there are any savefile or config file compatibilty problems upgrading from the current FC6 version to 0.3.0. I managed to irritate a few people when I bumped prboom from the 2.3 series to 2.4 in FC6 because of save/config file incompatibilities.
--Wart
"MT" == Michael Thomas wart@kobold.org writes:
MT> As I just wrote in bugzilla, I would avoid upgrading this for FC6 MT> if there are any savefile or config file compatibilty problems MT> upgrading from the current FC6 version to 0.3.0.
I have to agree; I've avoided bumping nazghul in the release branches due to savefile incompatibilities. (I'm only guessing as to the number of people who might actually have it installed though; my best estimate is about three or so. Smolt, save us!)
If you do update devel, make sure to get something into the release notes. The simplest way seems to be to include "*docs*" in your commit message and write in the release note.
- J<