Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: crack-attack - Puzzle action game
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202457
j.w.r.degoede@hhs.nl changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-games-list@redhat.com
------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede@hhs.nl 2006-08-27 16:00 EST ------- Everybody / anybody I'm cc-ing fedora-games-list as it looks like this package is going to be reviewed if you have any doubts, really any at all about the legal status of this package please speak up now, before it gets approved, imported and build!
(In reply to comment #7)
- The URL: tag appears to point to an old site, as the latest version on this
site is 1.1.10 and the source location is different. I feel http:// www.nongnu.org/crack-attack/ would be a better choice.
Fixed
- No use of %{name}-%{version} macros in Source tag. Personal preference but
just a heads up if you prefer to use them.
Missed those in the old specfile I inhereted, fixed.
- Several files are installed in the %doc directory which probably shouldn't
be there:
*.sanitize: The patch backup files crack-attack.6: An uncompressed copy of the man page, but the man page is correctly installed in %{_mandir}/man6/ crack-attack.xml: Really a 'source' file for generating the man page so I wouldn't install it. ready_to_release: Useless to the end user IMHO and shouldn't be installed.
Woops, fixed, thanks!
- /usr/share/crack-attack/crack-attack.desktop and /usr/share/crack-attack/
crack-attack.xpm, do these files really need to be there?
The .xpm is needed and I've used the .desktop as the .desktop and installed it with --delete-original.
New version with all this fixed here: Spec URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/crack-attack.spec SRPM URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/crack-attack-1.1.14-8.src.rpm