https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1082734
Vincent Batts <vbatts(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #6 from Vincent Batts <vbatts(a)redhat.com> ---
Approved. This rpm aligns with the current golang packaging guidelines and we
have an action item to clean out the other redundant rpm.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1082734
--- Comment #5 from Vincent Batts <vbatts(a)redhat.com> ---
(In reply to Lokesh Mandvekar from comment #4)
> Alex Larsson replied that guelfey is a maintainer of godbus/dbus, so
> golang-github-guelfey-godbus-devel probably won't be updated anymore.
>
> Also, I'm not sure if we should obsolete it right away (in case some rpm is
> using it currently), or give it some time (perhaps expire it at some point
> in future)
welp, i'm not sure the best way to find all those dependencies, but i bet it is
likely a small footprint. i say we get this rpm published, and push updates
for the rpms that are using the guelfey/dbus, to use this rpm instead, then we
can deprecate the guelfey rpm. sound reasonable?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1082734
--- Comment #4 from Lokesh Mandvekar <lsm5(a)redhat.com> ---
Alex Larsson replied that guelfey is a maintainer of godbus/dbus, so
golang-github-guelfey-godbus-devel probably won't be updated anymore.
Also, I'm not sure if we should obsolete it right away (in case some rpm is
using it currently), or give it some time (perhaps expire it at some point in
future)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1082734
--- Comment #3 from Lokesh Mandvekar <lsm5(a)redhat.com> ---
Awaiting confirmation here: https://github.com/guelfey/go.dbus/issues/51
But as Vincent said, since the import paths won't conflict, maybe the
obsoleting part can wait until we have guelfey's reply.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1082734
--- Comment #2 from Vincent Batts <vbatts(a)redhat.com> ---
(In reply to Peter Lemenkov from comment #1)
> Should this obsolete "golang-github-guelfey-godbus-devel" package?
Somewhat, except that they are different import paths, and therefore do not
_actually_ replace one another (despite one being a fork of the other).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
golang-github-smarterclayton-go-systemd has broken dependencies in the epel-7 tree:
On ppc64:
golang-github-smarterclayton-go-systemd-devel-0-0.4.git5cb9e9e.el7.noarch requires golang
Please resolve this as soon as possible.
golang-github-guelfey-godbus has broken dependencies in the epel-7 tree:
On ppc64:
golang-github-guelfey-godbus-devel-0-0.1.gitf6a3a23.el7.noarch requires golang
Please resolve this as soon as possible.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1082734
--- Comment #1 from Peter Lemenkov <lemenkov(a)gmail.com> ---
Should this obsolete "golang-github-guelfey-godbus-devel" package?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1082734
Peter Lemenkov <lemenkov(a)gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |golang(a)lists.fedoraproject.
| |org, lemenkov(a)gmail.com
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.