May 2014 - golang - Fedora Mailing-Lists

[Bug 1038329] New: Updating docker-io should probably restart the daemon

by Red Hat Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1038329 Bug ID: 1038329 Summary: Updating docker-io should probably restart the daemon Product: Fedora Version: 19 Component: docker-io Assignee: lsm5(a)redhat.com Reporter: luto(a)mit.edu QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: golang(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, lsm5(a)redhat.com, mattdm(a)redhat.com, mgoldman(a)redhat.com, vbatts(a)redhat.com I upgraded docker-io and, after the upgrade, I got errors about missing dockerinit. systemctl restart docker fixed it. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

9 years, 11 months

1
1
0 / 0

[Bug 1045173] New: Accessing Docker containers from outside network - adding firewall exceptions problem

by Red Hat Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1045173 Bug ID: 1045173 Summary: Accessing Docker containers from outside network - adding firewall exceptions problem Product: Fedora EPEL Version: el6 Component: docker-io Assignee: lsm5(a)redhat.com Reporter: ajinkya(a)ajinkyakulkarni.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: golang(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, lsm5(a)redhat.com, mattdm(a)redhat.com, mgoldman(a)redhat.com, skottler(a)redhat.com, vbatts(a)redhat.com I am using Docker 0.7.0 to create containers on RedHat Enterprise Linux 6.5. When firewall is turned off containers can talk to outside world, but when firewall is on, container cannot be accessed from outside. This is how I am running the docker and mapping a port from host to container $ docker run -i -t -p 3838:3838 shiny "shiny-server" Without firewall, I can access Node.js server running inside a container on port 3838 from outside network as http://servername:3838, but not with firewall turned on. These are my default firewall rules – ============================================== # Firewall configuration written by system-config-firewall # Manual customization of this file is not recommended. *filter :INPUT ACCEPT [0:0] :FORWARD ACCEPT [0:0] :OUTPUT ACCEPT [0:0] -A INPUT -m state --state ESTABLISHED,RELATED -j ACCEPT -A INPUT -p icmp -j ACCEPT -A INPUT -i lo -j ACCEPT -A INPUT -m state --state NEW -m tcp -p tcp --dport 443 -j ACCEPT -A INPUT -m state --state NEW -m tcp -p tcp --dport 22 -j ACCEPT -A INPUT -m state --state NEW -m tcp -p tcp --dport 80 -j ACCEPT -A INPUT -j REJECT --reject-with icmp-host-prohibited -A FORWARD -j REJECT --reject-with icmp-host-prohibited COMMIT ============================================== I have tried opening a port 3838 by adding a rule as below, but it does not work -A INPUT -m state --state NEW -m tcp -p tcp --dport 3838 -j ACCEPT Docker is creating a virtual NAT on the host machine, I am feeling that somehow firewall is blocking the packet forwarding from eth0 to docker 0 This is the output of $ifconfig (I have masked the server IP) docker0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:00:00:00:00:00 inet addr:172.17.42.1 Bcast:0.0.0.0 Mask:255.255.0.0 inet6 addr: fe80::87d:8dff:fed0:f16d/64 Scope:Link UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 RX packets:408321 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 TX packets:681809 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 collisions:0 txqueuelen:0 RX bytes:126511933 (120.6 MiB) TX bytes:924200959 (881.3 MiB) eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:25:64:A8:5B:8F inet addr:XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX Bcast:XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX Mask:255.255.240.0 inet6 addr: XXXX::XXX:XXXX:XXXX:XXXX/64 Scope:Link UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 RX packets:29786186 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 TX packets:1137982 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000 RX bytes:4209047011 (3.9 GiB) TX bytes:234657696 (223.7 MiB) Interrupt:17 lo Link encap:Local Loopback inet addr:127.0.0.1 Mask:255.0.0.0 inet6 addr: ::1/128 Scope:Host UP LOOPBACK RUNNING MTU:16436 Metric:1 RX packets:8444 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 TX packets:8444 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 collisions:0 txqueuelen:0 RX bytes:4701771 (4.4 MiB) TX bytes:4701771 (4.4 MiB) Output of $docker version : Client version: 0.7.0 Go version (client): go1.1.2 Git commit (client): 0ff9bc1/0.7.0 Server version: 0.7.0 Git commit (server): 0ff9bc1/0.7.0 Go version (server): go1.1.2 Last stable version: 0.7.2, please update docker Output of $docker info: Containers: 321 Images: 278 Driver: devicemapper Pool Name: docker-8:17-13239310-pool Data file: /var/lib/docker/devicemapper/devicemapper/data Metadata file: /var/lib/docker/devicemapper/devicemapper/metadata Data Space Used: 56464.5 Mb Data Space Total: 102400.0 Mb Metadata Space Used: 59.5 Mb Metadata Space Total: 2048.0 Mb I need help in making docker containers accessible from outside network without turning off the entire firewall. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

9 years, 11 months

1
6
0 / 0

[Bug 1071896] New: Fedora base image update failure in trusted builds at Docker index

by Red Hat Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1071896 Bug ID: 1071896 Summary: Fedora base image update failure in trusted builds at Docker index Product: Fedora Version: 20 Component: docker-io Assignee: lsm5(a)redhat.com Reporter: nshaikh(a)redhat.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: admiller(a)redhat.com, golang(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, lsm5(a)redhat.com, mattdm(a)redhat.com, mgoldman(a)redhat.com, skottler(a)redhat.com, vbatts(a)redhat.com Description of problem: I am using trusted build feature of Docker index and using Dockerfile [1] to build an image at Docker index. Dockerfile[1] is using stackbrew/fedora as base image. I am running "yum -y update" command in Dockerfile, however update is failing for systemd.x86_64 0:208-9.fc20 , check logs here[2]. I have retried building the image at Docker index, however each time it is failing with same error. Logs for 4 builds:[3] [1] https://github.com/swordphilic/redis-fedora/blob/master/Dockerfile [2] https://index.docker.io/builds/github/2159/swordphilic/redis-fedora/build... [3] https://index.docker.io/builds/github/2159/swordphilic/redis-fedora/builds -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

9 years, 11 months

1
13
0 / 0

[Bug 1085081] Docker sshd closing connection RHEL 6.5

by Red Hat Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1085081 --- Comment #7 from Daniel Walsh <dwalsh(a)redhat.com> --- http://people.redhat.com/dwalsh/SELinux/RHEL6/ contains an update libselinux which should be added to rhel6.5 image, which should allow stuff like useradd/groupadd to work. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

9 years, 11 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 1088828] New: specifying tty crashes docker

by Red Hat Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1088828 Bug ID: 1088828 Summary: specifying tty crashes docker Product: Fedora Version: 20 Component: docker-io Assignee: lsm5(a)redhat.com Reporter: nmavrogi(a)redhat.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: admiller(a)redhat.com, golang(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, lsm5(a)redhat.com, mattdm(a)redhat.com, mgoldman(a)redhat.com, skottler(a)redhat.com, vbatts(a)redhat.com Description of problem: Running docker as: sudo docker run -P --tty=false -p 22 -p 5551:5551/udp -a stderr -n --name test test1 works. However changing --tty=false to --tty=true brings the following backtrace: panic: runtime error: invalid memory address or nil pointer dereference [signal 0xb code=0x1 addr=0x20 pc=0x4f8d1d] goroutine 7 [running]: runtime.panic(0x8a5ac0, 0x1149948) /usr/lib64/golang/src/pkg/runtime/panic.c:266 +0xb6 bufio.(*Reader).writeBuf(0xc210038a80, 0x0, 0x0, 0x90aea0, 0x7f5c00000001, ...) /usr/lib64/golang/src/pkg/bufio/bufio.go:430 +0x6d bufio.(*Reader).WriteTo(0xc210038a80, 0x0, 0x0, 0x7f5cf5b40258, 0x0, ...) /usr/lib64/golang/src/pkg/bufio/bufio.go:402 +0x4d io.Copy(0x0, 0x0, 0x7f5cf5b40130, 0xc210038a80, 0x0, ...) /usr/lib64/golang/src/pkg/io/io.go:344 +0xa5 github.com/dotcloud/docker/api.func·016(0x0, 0x0) /builddir/build/BUILD/docker-0.9.1/_build/src/github.com/dotcloud/docker/api/client.go:2279 +0xf8 github.com/dotcloud/docker/utils.func·002() /builddir/build/BUILD/docker-0.9.1/_build/src/github.com/dotcloud/docker/utils/utils.go:38 +0x2e created by github.com/dotcloud/docker/utils.Go /builddir/build/BUILD/docker-0.9.1/_build/src/github.com/dotcloud/docker/utils/utils.go:39 +0xa7 goroutine 1 [runnable]: net/http.ReadResponse(0xc210038cc0, 0xc2100b1680, 0xc2100b1680, 0xc210050950, 0xc210000d01) /usr/lib64/golang/src/pkg/net/http/response.go:108 +0x3b net/http/httputil.(*ClientConn).Read(0xc2100b0420, 0xc2100b1680, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0) /usr/lib64/golang/src/pkg/net/http/httputil/persist.go:397 +0x37b net/http/httputil.(*ClientConn).Do(0xc2100b0420, 0xc2100b1680, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0) /usr/lib64/golang/src/pkg/net/http/httputil/persist.go:421 +0x85 github.com/dotcloud/docker/api.(*DockerCli).call(0xc2100468c0, 0x935500, 0x4, 0xc210038c00, 0x52, ...) /builddir/build/BUILD/docker-0.9.1/_build/src/github.com/dotcloud/docker/api/client.go:2119 +0x86b github.com/dotcloud/docker/api.(*DockerCli).CmdRun(0xc2100468c0, 0xc21000a020, 0xc, 0xc, 0x0, ...) /builddir/build/BUILD/docker-0.9.1/_build/src/github.com/dotcloud/docker/api/client.go:1924 +0x17d9 reflect.callMethod(0xc2100ac060, 0x7f5cf59aeab8) /usr/lib64/golang/src/pkg/reflect/value.go:676 +0x17b reflect.methodValueCall(0xc21000a020, 0xc, 0xc, 0xc2100ac060, 0x7f5cf5b3e101) /usr/lib64/golang/src/pkg/reflect/asm_amd64.s:26 +0x24 github.com/dotcloud/docker/api.ParseCommands(0xc2100ad020, 0x4, 0xc2100ad027, 0x14, 0xc21000a010, ...) /builddir/build/BUILD/docker-0.9.1/_build/src/github.com/dotcloud/docker/api/client.go:70 +0x31f main.main() /builddir/build/BUILD/docker-0.9.1/docker/docker.go:151 +0x1f5f goroutine 3 [syscall]: os/signal.loop() /usr/lib64/golang/src/pkg/os/signal/signal_unix.go:21 +0x1e created by os/signal.init·1 /usr/lib64/golang/src/pkg/os/signal/signal_unix.go:27 +0x31 goroutine 6 [chan receive]: github.com/dotcloud/docker/api.(*DockerCli).hijack(0xc2100468c0, 0x935500, 0x4, 0xc2100b90e0, 0x65, ...) /builddir/build/BUILD/docker-0.9.1/_build/src/github.com/dotcloud/docker/api/client.go:2307 +0x98a github.com/dotcloud/docker/api.func·011(0x0, 0x6964c0) /builddir/build/BUILD/docker-0.9.1/_build/src/github.com/dotcloud/docker/api/client.go:1902 +0x1be github.com/dotcloud/docker/utils.func·002() /builddir/build/BUILD/docker-0.9.1/_build/src/github.com/dotcloud/docker/utils/utils.go:38 +0x2e created by github.com/dotcloud/docker/utils.Go /builddir/build/BUILD/docker-0.9.1/_build/src/github.com/dotcloud/docker/utils/utils.go:39 +0xa7 goroutine 8 [runnable]: github.com/dotcloud/docker/utils.func·002() /builddir/build/BUILD/docker-0.9.1/_build/src/github.com/dotcloud/docker/utils/utils.go:37 created by github.com/dotcloud/docker/utils.Go /builddir/build/BUILD/docker-0.9.1/_build/src/github.com/dotcloud/docker/utils/utils.go:39 +0xa7 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

9 years, 11 months

1
1
0 / 0

[Bug 1099984] Pam issue when trying to login to a container running sshd.

by Red Hat Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1099984 Daniel Walsh <dwalsh(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags|needinfo?(dwalsh(a)redhat.com | |) | --- Comment #5 from Daniel Walsh <dwalsh(a)redhat.com> --- Jeremy, have you tried the new pam package? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

9 years, 11 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 1055712] Review Request: docker - Automates deployment of containerized applications

by Red Hat Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1055712 dcorking <dmcf(a)dcorking.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends On| |1043676 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1043676 [Bug 1043676] drop docker from rawhide (or redirect to wmdocker) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

9 years, 11 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 1060502] Review Request: golang-github-mitchellh-cli - A library for implementing powerful command-line interfaces in Go

by Red Hat Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060502 Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak(a)v3.sk> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #6 from Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak(a)v3.sk> --- Seems all fine to me now. Thank you! APPROVED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

9 years, 11 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 1060580] Review Request: golang-github-hashicorp-logutils - A Go package that augments the standard library "log" package

by Red Hat Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060580 --- Comment #2 from Jeff Schroeder <jeffschroeder(a)computer.org> --- Updating based on feedback from some other reviews. Koji looks good: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6887716 Updated files: http://www.digitalprognosis.com/opensource/packages/golang-github-hashico... http://www.digitalprognosis.com/opensource/packages/golang-github-hashico... rpmlint is also clean: [jeff@omniscience SPECS] (master)$ rpmlint golang-github-hashicorp-logutils.spec ../SRPMS/golang-github-hashicorp-logutils-0-0.1.git8e0820f.fc20.src.rpm ../RPMS/golang-github-hashicorp-logutils-devel-0-0.1.git8e0820f.fc20.noarch.rpm 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

9 years, 11 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 1060503] Review Request: golang-github-mitchellh-mapstructure - A Go library for decoding generic map values to structures and vice versa

by Red Hat Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060503 --- Comment #2 from Jeff Schroeder <jeffschroeder(a)computer.org> --- Updated based on some comments from another package: Koji build looks good: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6887684 Updated files: http://www.digitalprognosis.com/opensource/packages/golang-github-mitchel... http://www.digitalprognosis.com/opensource/packages/golang-github-mitchel... rpmlint is also clean: [jeff@omniscience SPECS] (master)$ rpmlint golang-github-mitchellh-mapstructure.spec ../SRPMS/golang-github-mitchellh-mapstructure-0-0.1.git6fb2c83.fc20.src.rpm ../RPMS/golang-github-mitchellh-mapstructure-devel-0-0.1.git6fb2c83.fc20.noarch.rpm 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

9 years, 11 months

1
0
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

golang May 2014