golang April 2015

golang@lists.fedoraproject.org

2 participants
132 discussions

[Bug 1087720] New: signal 27 (SIGPROF) not passed to container using --sig-proxy
by Red Hat Bugzilla 15 Apr '15

15 Apr '15

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1087720 Bug ID: 1087720 Summary: signal 27 (SIGPROF) not passed to container using --sig-proxy Product: Fedora Version: 20 Component: docker-io Assignee: lsm5(a)redhat.com Reporter: ldoktor(a)redhat.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: admiller(a)redhat.com, golang(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, lsm5(a)redhat.com, mattdm(a)redhat.com, mgoldman(a)redhat.com, skottler(a)redhat.com, vbatts(a)redhat.com Description of problem: When I send signal 27 to the docker process, which is running with --sig-proxy=true, it's not forwarded. Other signals are... Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): docker-io-0.9.1-1.fc21.x86_64 How reproducible: always Steps to Reproduce: 1. /usr/bin/docker -D run --tty=false --rm -i --name test_eoly localhost:5000/ldoktor/fedora:latest bash -c 'for NUM in `seq 1 64`; do trap "echo Received $NUM, ignoring..." $NUM; done; while :; do sleep 1; done' 2. ps ax |grep docker 3. kill -27 $PID Actual results: nothing Expected results: Received 27, ignoring... Additional info: When you send any other signal (apart from 19 or 9) it works fine. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 17

[Bug 1159935] "docker events --until" reports the events created even after the specified timestamp
by Red Hat Bugzilla 15 Apr '15

15 Apr '15

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1159935 Daniel Walsh <dwalsh(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|unspecified |low -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1159935] "docker events --until" reports the events created even after the specified timestamp
by Red Hat Bugzilla 15 Apr '15

15 Apr '15

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1159935 --- Comment #4 from Daniel Walsh <dwalsh(a)redhat.com> --- shishir can you check if this one is fixed? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1171928] update from 3.2-27 to 3.2-28 fails on docker fedora 21 image
by Red Hat Bugzilla 15 Apr '15

15 Apr '15

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1171928 Daniel Walsh <dwalsh(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Component|docker-io |filesystem Assignee|ichavero(a)redhat.com |ovasik(a)redhat.com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1166312] New: etcd unit should support command line options
by Red Hat Bugzilla 13 Apr '15

13 Apr '15

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1166312 Bug ID: 1166312 Summary: etcd unit should support command line options Product: Fedora Version: 21 Component: etcd Assignee: lacypret(a)gmail.com Reporter: lars(a)redhat.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: eparis(a)redhat.com, golang(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, jchaloup(a)redhat.com, lacypret(a)gmail.com, lemenkov(a)gmail.com The "etcd.service" unit distributed with Fedora 21 (atomic) does not contain any facilities for passing arguments to etcd. That is, it looks like this: [Service] Type=simple StandardOutput=null WorkingDirectory=/var/lib/etcd User=etcd ExecStart=/usr/bin/etcd This means that if a deployer wants to pass arguments to etcd at boot (such as a discovery URL), the only option is to introduce a new unit file in /etc/systemd/system. This works, but it seems like a heavy hammer. It seems as if a better choice would be to introduce an EnvironmentFile directive like we do for so many other units. Something like: [Service] Type=simple StandardOutput=null WorkingDirectory=/var/lib/etcd User=etcd EnvironmentFile=/etc/sysconfig/etcd ExecStart=/usr/bin/etcd $OPTIONS -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 4

[Bug 1166950] New: Unable to run "mysql" docker image on Fedora atomic due to selinux
by Red Hat Bugzilla 13 Apr '15

13 Apr '15

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1166950 Bug ID: 1166950 Summary: Unable to run "mysql" docker image on Fedora atomic due to selinux Product: Fedora Version: 21 Component: docker-io Assignee: lsm5(a)fedoraproject.org Reporter: lars(a)redhat.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: admiller(a)redhat.com, golang(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, hushan.jia(a)gmail.com, jchaloup(a)redhat.com, jperrin(a)centos.org, lsm5(a)fedoraproject.org, mattdm(a)redhat.com, mgoldman(a)redhat.com, miminar(a)redhat.com, s(a)shk.io, thrcka(a)redhat.com, vbatts(a)redhat.com The "mysql" Docker image creates a volume on /var/lib/mysql inside the container. At runtime, the entrypoint script attempts to chown this directory to the mysql user, which leads to the following error: # docker run -e MYSQL_ROOT_PASSWORD=secret mysql FATAL ERROR: Could not chown directory /var/lib/mysql And the following AVC: type=AVC msg=audit(1416629737.562:201): avc: denied { setattr } for pid=22615 comm="mysql_install_d" name="d27cb6010a47942d7dc4826ebfe138ea62888fc9a5dedcaf14ebb3a1f45781c2" dev="dm-0" ino=6329484 scontext=system_u:system_r:svirt_lxc_net_t:s0:c190,c586 tcontext=system_u:object_r:docker_var_lib_t:s0 tclass=dir permissive=0 Which translates to: module docker 1.0; require { type svirt_lxc_net_t; type docker_var_lib_t; class dir setattr; } #============= svirt_lxc_net_t ============== allow svirt_lxc_net_t docker_var_lib_t:dir setattr; A simple reproducer is to create a Dockerfile with the following: FROM fedora VOLUME /var/lib/myvolume RUN chown nobody /var/lib/myvolume And attempt to "docker build .": Sending build context to Docker daemon 2.56 kB Sending build context to Docker daemon Step 0 : FROM fedora ---> 7d3f07f8de5f Step 1 : VOLUME /var/lib/myvolume ---> Running in 5f2e6a9a51e0 ---> ea49c8d042b2 Removing intermediate container 5f2e6a9a51e0 Step 2 : RUN chown nobody /var/lib/myvolume ---> Running in d1083d0ccc68 chown: changing ownership of '/var/lib/myvolume': Permission denied 2014/11/22 04:27:19 The command [/bin/sh -c chown nobody /var/lib/myvolume] returned a non-zero code: 1 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 5

Broken dependencies: golang-github-google-gofuzz
by Fedora Koji Build System 11 Apr '15

11 Apr '15

golang-github-google-gofuzz has broken dependencies in the epel-6 tree: On ppc64: golang-github-google-gofuzz-devel-0-0.5.gitbbcb9da.el6.noarch requires golang >= 0:1.2.1-3 Please resolve this as soon as possible.

1 0

Broken dependencies: golang-github-google-gofuzz
by Fedora Koji Build System 11 Apr '15

11 Apr '15

1 0

[Bug 1085881] Review Request: golang-github-spf13-cobra - A Commander for modern go CLI interactions
by Red Hat Bugzilla 11 Apr '15

11 Apr '15

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1085881 Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|golang-github-spf13-cobra-0 |golang-github-spf13-cobra-0 |-0.7.git79bd93d.fc21 |-0.7.git79bd93d.fc20 --- Comment #31 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> --- golang-github-spf13-cobra-0-0.7.git79bd93d.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1082734] Review Request: golang-github-godbus-dbus - Go client bindings for D-Bus
by Red Hat Bugzilla 11 Apr '15

11 Apr '15

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1082734 Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|golang-github-godbus-dbus-2 |golang-github-godbus-dbus-2 |-0.1.git939230d.fc21 |-0.1.git939230d.fc20 --- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> --- golang-github-godbus-dbus-2-0.1.git939230d.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

golang April 2015