https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1215336
Bug ID: 1215336
Summary: godoc uses invalid path for documentation
Product: Fedora
Version: 21
Component: golang
Severity: low
Assignee: vbatts(a)redhat.com
Reporter: eugene.yudin(a)gmail.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: admiller(a)redhat.com, golang(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
lemenkov(a)gmail.com, renich(a)woralelandia.com, s(a)shk.io,
vbatts(a)redhat.com
Description of problem:
Command "godoc" doesn't show documentation.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
golang-godoc.x86_64 1:0-1.0.hgd32b5854c941.fc21
How reproducible:
Always.
Steps to Reproduce:
$ godoc fmt Println
2015/04/25 18:00:38 open /usr/lib/golang/src/pkg/fmt: no such file or directory
Workaround:
# cd /usr/lib/golang/src/
# ln -s . pkg
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1222416
Bug ID: 1222416
Summary: etcd-v2.0.11 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: etcd
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee: jchaloup(a)redhat.com
Reporter: jchaloup(a)redhat.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: avagarwa(a)redhat.com, eparis(a)redhat.com,
extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org,
golang(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, jchaloup(a)redhat.com,
lacypret(a)gmail.com, lemenkov(a)gmail.com,
lsm5(a)redhat.com,
upstream-release-monitoring(a)fedoraproject.org,
walters(a)redhat.com
Latest upstream release: v2.0.11
Current version/release in rawhide: 2.0.10-1.fc23
URL: https://github.com/coreos/etcd
Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a
stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy
More information about the service that created this bug can be found at:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring
Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging
changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your
responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still
correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added
upstream.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1160833
Bug ID: 1160833
Summary: Fedora 21 Beta Atomic Image: broken links, incomplete
documentation, missing "docker" executable
Product: Fedora
Version: 21
Component: docker-io
Severity: high
Assignee: lsm5(a)fedoraproject.org
Reporter: znmeb(a)znmeb.net
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: admiller(a)redhat.com, golang(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
hushan.jia(a)gmail.com, jperrin(a)centos.org,
lsm5(a)fedoraproject.org, mattdm(a)redhat.com,
mgoldman(a)redhat.com, miminar(a)redhat.com, s(a)shk.io,
thrcka(a)redhat.com, vbatts(a)redhat.com
Description of problem: Multiple problems with Fedora 21 Beta Atomic Image:
broken links, incomplete documentation, missing "docker" executable
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): Atomic Images
beta
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Browse to http://fedoraproject.org/en/get-prerelease#cloud.
2. Attempt to download and discover broken link to qcow2 and raw disk images on
the beta release page.
3. Find, download, verify checksum of images at
http://mirror.pnl.gov/fedora/linux/releases/test/21-Beta/Cloud/Images/x86_6…
4. Prepare an initialization ISO file as described in
http://www.projectatomic.io/docs/quickstart/ and
https://www.technovelty.org//linux/running-cloud-images-locally.html. Note that
said documentation
a. Is *not* part of the Fedora documentation, which is something I expect
for something carrying the "Fedora Cloud" brand, and
b. Nowhere is it *explicitly* stated that the username is "fedora" or that
once you log in as "fedora", "sudo su -" works to get you into "root" on the
console.
5. Log in as "fedora", type "sudo su -" and type "docker ps".
Actual results: '-bash: docker: command not found'
Expected results:
1. Working links on the beta release page
2. Fedora-branded documentation with the username and how to obtain root.
3. Docker installed and ready to create images and containers.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1187649
Bug ID: 1187649
Summary: Fedora:latest docker image d-bus unknown error -1
Product: Fedora
Version: 21
Component: docker-io
Assignee: lsm5(a)redhat.com
Reporter: cyborg101010(a)gmail.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: adimania(a)gmail.com, admiller(a)redhat.com,
golang(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, hushan.jia(a)gmail.com,
jchaloup(a)redhat.com, jperrin(a)centos.org,
lsm5(a)redhat.com, mattdm(a)redhat.com,
mgoldman(a)redhat.com, miminar(a)redhat.com, s(a)shk.io,
thrcka(a)redhat.com, vbatts(a)redhat.com
Description of problem:
When trying to use anything that relies on D-Bus, on Fedora:latest, you get the
error: Failed to get D-Bus connection: Unknown error -1
How reproducible:
100%
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Attach to Fedora:latest
2. yum install postgresql-server -y
3. systemctl start postgresql
Actual results:
Failed to get D-Bus connection: Unknown error -1
Expected results:
Systemd starts postgres
Additional info:
It's not just postgres, I've tried with others.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1216153
Bug ID: 1216153
Summary: Docker daemon runs in shared mount namespace
Product: Fedora EPEL
Version: el6
Component: docker-io
Assignee: ichavero(a)redhat.com
Reporter: michaeljameswells+redhatbugzilla(a)gmail.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: adimania(a)gmail.com, admiller(a)redhat.com,
golang(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, hushan.jia(a)gmail.com,
ichavero(a)redhat.com, jchaloup(a)redhat.com,
jperrin(a)centos.org, lsm5(a)redhat.com,
mattdm(a)redhat.com, mgoldman(a)redhat.com,
miminar(a)redhat.com, s(a)shk.io, thrcka(a)redhat.com,
vbatts(a)redhat.com
Description of problem:
The docker daemon is run in a shared mount namespace, causing problems when
restarting the docker service. This prevents starting up containers where
mounts remain in place.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
1.5.0-1.el6
How reproducible:
Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1. docker run -d --name test centos sleep infinity
2. service docker restart
3. docker start test
Actual results:
Error response from daemon: Cannot start container test: Error getting
container 0412d5cce356ff269bd85b2096eb8bc0b2cc58a67096c6c6587a85f7e82f0b77 from
driver devicemapper: Error mounting
'/dev/mapper/docker-253:0-2097716-0412d5cce356ff269bd85b2096eb8bc0b2cc58a67096c6c6587a85f7e82f0b77'
on
'/var/lib/docker/devicemapper/mnt/0412d5cce356ff269bd85b2096eb8bc0b2cc58a67096c6c6587a85f7e82f0b77':
device or resource busy
FATA[0000] Error: failed to start one or more containers
Expected results:
Container to start.
Additional info:
A merged pull request containing updated sysvinit script is found here:
https://github.com/docker/docker/pull/10225
It was merged prior to the 1.5.0 release and involves running "unshare -m" when
starting the docker daemon to place it into its own mount namespace.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1216265
Bug ID: 1216265
Summary: docker exec -it bash cannot start a shell session
Product: Fedora
Version: 22
Component: docker-io
Severity: high
Assignee: ichavero(a)redhat.com
Reporter: robberphex(a)gmail.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: adimania(a)gmail.com, admiller(a)redhat.com,
golang(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, hushan.jia(a)gmail.com,
ichavero(a)redhat.com, jchaloup(a)redhat.com,
jperrin(a)centos.org, lsm5(a)redhat.com,
mattdm(a)redhat.com, mgoldman(a)redhat.com,
miminar(a)redhat.com, s(a)shk.io, thrcka(a)redhat.com,
vbatts(a)redhat.com
Description of problem:
`docker exec -it <name> /bin/bash` cannot work
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
$ uname -a
Linux rp.fedora 4.0.0-0.rc5.git4.1.fc22.x86_64 #1 SMP Fri Mar 27 13:51:23 UTC
2015 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
$ sudo docker version
Client version: 1.6.0
Client API version: 1.18
Go version (client): go1.4.2
Git commit (client): 0591dce/1.6.0
OS/Arch (client): linux/amd64
Server version: 1.6.0
Server API version: 1.18
Go version (server): go1.4.2
Git commit (server): 0591dce/1.6.0
OS/Arch (server): linux/amd64
How reproducible:
Steps to Reproduce:
1. `sudo docker run --name some-nginx -d nginx:1.7`
2. `sudo docker exec -it some-nginx /bin/bash`
Actual results:
<no output>
Expected results:
start a bash session
Additional info:
`sudo docker exec -it some-nginx echo hello` also have no ouput.
but `sudo docker exec some-nginx echo hello` get the output('hello').
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1224417
Bug ID: 1224417
Summary: add selinux label for /var/lib/kubelet
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: docker-io
Assignee: ichavero(a)redhat.com
Reporter: eparis(a)redhat.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: adimania(a)gmail.com, admiller(a)redhat.com,
golang(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, hushan.jia(a)gmail.com,
ichavero(a)redhat.com, jchaloup(a)redhat.com,
jperrin(a)centos.org, lsm5(a)redhat.com,
mattdm(a)redhat.com, mgoldman(a)redhat.com,
miminar(a)redhat.com, s(a)shk.io, thrcka(a)redhat.com,
vbatts(a)redhat.com
can we get system_u:object_r:svirt_sandbox_file_t:s0 added as the filecontext
for /var/lib/kubelet to the docker-selinux package?
can/should we maybe break docker-selinux into it's own package?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1096286
Bug ID: 1096286
Summary: "docker top all" doesn't show processes when
--tty=false
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7
Version: 7.1
Component: docker
Assignee: lsm5(a)redhat.com
Reporter: ldoktor(a)redhat.com
QA Contact: virt-bugs(a)redhat.com
CC: admiller(a)redhat.com, golang(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
lsm5(a)redhat.com, mattdm(a)redhat.com,
mgoldman(a)redhat.com, skottler(a)redhat.com,
vbatts(a)redhat.com
Depends On: 1088259
+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #1088259 +++
After using the same magic required for the upstream docker 0.10 this behaves
the same on RHEL docker-0.10.0-8.el7.x86_64
Description of problem:
Hi guys, when I run docker with --tty=false, the `docker top $NAME all` doesn't
show any processes (just headers). When using only `docker top $NAME` it shows
them...
Also the `ps` command inside container works, but `ps all` does not.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
docker-0.10.0-8.el7.x86_64
docker-io-0.9.0-3.fc20.x86_64
How reproducible:
always
Steps to Reproduce:
1. docker run -i --tty=false fedora bash
2. docker logs $NAME
Actual results:
F UID PID PPID
PRI NI VSZ RSS
WCHAN STAT TTY TIME
COMMAND
Expected results:
F UID PID PPID
PRI NI VSZ RSS
WCHAN STAT TTY TIME
COMMAND
1 0 24006 23954
20 0 11732 540
- R pts/14 0:00
bash
--- Additional comment from Lukas Doktor on 2014-05-05 03:41:35 EDT ---
Can't reproduce with the upstream Docker version 0.10.0, build dc9c28f/0.10.0
top doesn't work at all (due of
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1088125 )
--- Additional comment from Lukas Doktor on 2014-05-05 03:46:07 EDT ---
OK I moved it to the old cgroup location and the results are the same. So
booth, fedora docker-io-0.9.0-3.fc20.x86_64 and upstream dc9c28f/0.10.0 are
unable to list processes using `all` argument in non-tty mode.
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1088259
[Bug 1088259] "docker top all" doesn't show processes when --tty=false
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1088259
Bug ID: 1088259
Summary: "docker top all" doesn't show processes when
--tty=false
Product: Fedora
Version: 20
Component: docker-io
Assignee: lsm5(a)redhat.com
Reporter: ldoktor(a)redhat.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: admiller(a)redhat.com, golang(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
lsm5(a)redhat.com, mattdm(a)redhat.com,
mgoldman(a)redhat.com, skottler(a)redhat.com,
vbatts(a)redhat.com
Description of problem:
Hi guys, when I run docker with --tty=false, the `docker top $NAME all` doesn't
show any processes (just headers). When using only `docker top $NAME` it shows
them...
Also the `ps` command inside container works, but `ps all` does not.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
docker-io-0.9.0-3.fc20.x86_64
How reproducible:
always
Steps to Reproduce:
1. docker run -i --tty=false fedora bash
2. docker logs $NAME
Actual results:
F UID PID PPID
PRI NI VSZ RSS
WCHAN STAT TTY TIME
COMMAND
Expected results:
F UID PID PPID
PRI NI VSZ RSS
WCHAN STAT TTY TIME
COMMAND
1 0 24006 23954
20 0 11732 540
- R pts/14 0:00
bash
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1226810
Bug ID: 1226810
Summary: golang-vim package removed? (go syntax highlighting in
vim)
Product: Fedora
Version: 22
Component: golang
Severity: low
Assignee: vbatts(a)redhat.com
Reporter: keesdejong+bugs(a)gmail.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: admiller(a)redhat.com, golang(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
lemenkov(a)gmail.com, renich(a)woralelandia.com, s(a)shk.io,
vbatts(a)redhat.com
Description of problem:
In Fedora 21 the package 'golang-vim' was available:
http://rpmfind.net/linux/rpm2html/search.php?query=golang-vim
How reproducible: `dnf search golang | grep vi` returns no results.
Additional info: If the package is orphaned or something like that then I would
like to know. Then I will package and maintain it.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.