golang July 2015

golang@lists.fedoraproject.org

2 participants
177 discussions

[Bug 1248654] New: Tracker for golang-github-armon-go-radix
by Red Hat Bugzilla 15 Jan '16

15 Jan '16

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1248654 Bug ID: 1248654 Summary: Tracker for golang-github-armon-go-radix Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: golang-github-armon-go-radix Assignee: fpokorny(a)redhat.com Reporter: fpokorny(a)redhat.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: fpokorny(a)redhat.com, golang(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, jchaloup(a)redhat.com, lsm5(a)redhat.com Tracker for async updates of golang-github-armon-go-radix for rawhide and other fedora distribution. As golang devel packages are used only as a build-time dependency at the moment, this tracker keeps updates and other information about this package, e.g. broken dependencies, exceptions, important pieces of information and other issues. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 13

[Bug 1243892] New: Tracker for golang-github-mitchellh-mapstructure
by Red Hat Bugzilla 15 Jan '16

15 Jan '16

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1243892 Bug ID: 1243892 Summary: Tracker for golang-github-mitchellh-mapstructure Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: golang-github-mitchellh-mapstructure Severity: low Priority: low Assignee: jchaloup(a)redhat.com Reporter: jchaloup(a)redhat.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: golang(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, jchaloup(a)redhat.com, lsm5(a)redhat.com, vbatts(a)redhat.com Tracker for async updates of golang-github-mitchellh-mapstructure for rawhide and other fedora distribution. As golang devel packages are used only as a build-time dependency at the moment, this tracker keeps updates and other information about this package, e.g. broken dependencies, exceptions, important pieces of information and other issues. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 23

[Bug 1227708] New: Provide an additional sub-package with a skydns binary
by Red Hat Bugzilla 08 Jan '16

08 Jan '16

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1227708 Bug ID: 1227708 Summary: Provide an additional sub-package with a skydns binary Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: golang-github-skynetservices-skydns Assignee: jchaloup(a)redhat.com Reporter: lemenkov(a)gmail.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: golang(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, jchaloup(a)redhat.com, lsm5(a)redhat.com Hello! This packagew right now provides only a devel-package, totally ignoring its one of the main purposes - skydns binary. Let's modify the package and introduce an additional sub-package - with skydns executable. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 10

[Bug 1145659] New: [PATCH] Support /etc/sysconfig/docker-storage
by Red Hat Bugzilla 07 Jan '16

07 Jan '16

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1145659 Bug ID: 1145659 Summary: [PATCH] Support /etc/sysconfig/docker-storage Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: docker-io Assignee: lsm5(a)fedoraproject.org Reporter: walters(a)redhat.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: admiller(a)redhat.com, dwalsh(a)redhat.com, golang(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, hushan.jia(a)gmail.com, jperrin(a)centos.org, lsm5(a)fedoraproject.org, mattdm(a)redhat.com, mgoldman(a)redhat.com, s(a)shk.io, thrcka(a)redhat.com, vbatts(a)redhat.com, virt-bugs(a)redhat.com Depends On: 1144206 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1144206 [Bug 1144206] [PATCH] Support /etc/sysconfig/docker-storage -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 2

[Bug 1096296] New: man page inaccuracy about --sig-proxy and --tty
by Red Hat Bugzilla 07 Jan '16

07 Jan '16

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1096296 Bug ID: 1096296 Summary: man page inaccuracy about --sig-proxy and --tty Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 Version: 7.1 Component: docker Assignee: lsm5(a)redhat.com Reporter: ldoktor(a)redhat.com QA Contact: virt-bugs(a)redhat.com CC: admiller(a)redhat.com, golang(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, lsm5(a)redhat.com, mattdm(a)redhat.com, mgoldman(a)redhat.com, skottler(a)redhat.com, vbatts(a)redhat.com, whenry(a)redhat.com Depends On: 1087697 +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #1087697 +++ Description of problem: Hi guys, the man page states: --sig-proxy=true: Proxify all received signal to the process (even in non-tty mode) But the real behavior is, that sig-proxy doesn't work when --tty=true. It should be mentioned in there, taht --sig-proxy is incompatible with --tty. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): docker-io-0.9.1-1.fc21.x86_64 How reproducible: always Steps to Reproduce: 1. man docker Actual results: man page says it works even in non-tty Expected results: man page warns that --tty can't be used with --sig-proxy How to verify: 1. docker run --tty=true -i --rm fedora bash -c 'for NUM in `seq 1 64`; do trap "echo Received $NUM, ignoring..." $NUM; done; while :; do sleep 1; done' 2. ps -ax | grep docker 3. kill -SIGUSR1 $PID 4. (with --tty=true no signals are received, when you try the same with --tty=false, signals are proxified and messages are displayed) --- Additional comment from Lokesh Mandvekar on 2014-04-15 02:11:48 EDT --- Copying William (he recently got per subcommand manpages merged upstream). this seems to be the case even in the latest manpage (I'm guessing this was inherited from the original manpage). William, was there any discussion about this in your PR? --- Additional comment from Lokesh Mandvekar on 2014-04-15 02:15:31 EDT --- btw, the 0.10 rpm includes the latest manpages (should be in yum soon) --- Additional comment from Lukas Doktor on 2014-04-15 04:45:55 EDT --- Thanks for a quick reply. I tried the docker-io-0.10.0-2.fc20.x86_64 which says: --sig-proxy=true|false: When set to true, proxify all received signals to the process (even in non-tty mode). The default is true. I'd really like to change it to "only in non-tty" with possible warning that --tty=true is incompatible with --sig-proxy. --- Additional comment from William Henry on 2014-04-30 15:54:25 EDT --- I go this text from upstream. I'll check. --- Additional comment from William Henry on 2014-04-30 16:02:22 EDT --- Lukas,according to the folks upstream, this is a bug in docker run and attach. It should be as the text suggests. Can you file a bug upstream with docker? Here: https://github.com/dotcloud/docker/issues Please just take the information you posted above and post it there. Thanks. Well spotted. Best, William --- Additional comment from Lukas Doktor on 2014-05-02 04:02:01 EDT --- Upstream tracer: https://github.com/dotcloud/docker/issues/5547 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1087697 [Bug 1087697] man page inaccuracy about --sig-proxy and --tty -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 21

[Bug 1096276] New: signal 27 (SIGPROF) not passed to container using --sig-proxy
by Red Hat Bugzilla 07 Jan '16

07 Jan '16

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1096276 Bug ID: 1096276 Summary: signal 27 (SIGPROF) not passed to container using --sig-proxy Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 Version: 7.1 Component: docker Assignee: lsm5(a)redhat.com Reporter: ldoktor(a)redhat.com QA Contact: virt-bugs(a)redhat.com CC: admiller(a)redhat.com, golang(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, lsm5(a)redhat.com, mattdm(a)redhat.com, mgoldman(a)redhat.com, skottler(a)redhat.com, vbatts(a)redhat.com Depends On: 1087720 +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #1087720 +++ Description of problem: When I send signal 27 to the docker process, which is running with --sig-proxy=true, it's not forwarded. Other signals are... Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): docker-0.10.0-8.el7.x86_64 docker-io-0.9.1-1.fc21.x86_64 upstream Docker version 0.10.0, build dc9c28f/0.10.0 How reproducible: always Steps to Reproduce: 1. /usr/bin/docker -D run --tty=false --rm -i --name test_eoly localhost:5000/ldoktor/fedora:latest bash -c 'for NUM in `seq 1 64`; do trap "echo Received $NUM, ignoring..." $NUM; done; while :; do sleep 1; done' 2. ps ax |grep docker 3. kill -27 $PID Actual results: nothing Expected results: Received 27, ignoring... Additional info: When you send any other signal (apart from 19 or 9) it works fine. --- Additional comment from Lukas Doktor on 2014-04-15 04:59:24 EDT --- The signal 17 is also ignored. --- Additional comment from Lukas Doktor on 2014-05-05 03:48:25 EDT --- The same bug is in upstream Docker version 0.10.0, build dc9c28f/0.10.0 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1087720 [Bug 1087720] signal 27 (SIGPROF) not passed to container using --sig-proxy -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 26

[Bug 1247656] New: Tracker for golang-github-BurntSushi-toml
by Red Hat Bugzilla 11 Dec '15

11 Dec '15

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1247656 Bug ID: 1247656 Summary: Tracker for golang-github-BurntSushi-toml Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: golang-github-BurntSushi-toml Severity: low Priority: low Assignee: fpokorny(a)redhat.com Reporter: fpokorny(a)redhat.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: fpokorny(a)redhat.com, golang(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, jchaloup(a)redhat.com, lsm5(a)redhat.com, vbatts(a)redhat.com Tracker for async updates for rawhide and other fedora distribution. As golang devel packages are used only as a build-time dependency at the moment, this tracker keeps updates and other information about this package, e.g. broken dependencies, exceptions, important pieces of information and other issues. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 7

[Bug 1217613] New: Cannot start container [8] System error: mountpoint for cpuset not found
by Red Hat Bugzilla 02 Dec '15

02 Dec '15

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1217613 Bug ID: 1217613 Summary: Cannot start container [8] System error: mountpoint for cpuset not found Product: Fedora Version: 21 Component: docker-io Assignee: ichavero(a)redhat.com Reporter: jiri.folta(a)centrum.cz QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: adimania(a)gmail.com, admiller(a)redhat.com, golang(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, hushan.jia(a)gmail.com, ichavero(a)redhat.com, jchaloup(a)redhat.com, jperrin(a)centos.org, lsm5(a)redhat.com, mattdm(a)redhat.com, mgoldman(a)redhat.com, miminar(a)redhat.com, s(a)shk.io, thrcka(a)redhat.com, vbatts(a)redhat.com Created attachment 1020711 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1020711&action=edit screenshot of the error Description of problem: when trying to run a container using Cockpit I get "System error: mountpoint for cpuset not found" error Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): cockpit: Version 0.27. Built on Wed Mar 25 12:53:20 UTC 2015. How reproducible: allways Steps to Reproduce: 1.Install minimal Fedora 21 for arm platform from http://www.digitaldreamtime.co.uk/images/Fidora/21/ 2.update the system 3.install cockpit and docker 4.login to the server using web interface https://ip:9090 5.download Image: docker.io/wordpress:latest 6. try running the image Actual results: you get an error message(attached) Expected results: actually running the image Additional info: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 9

[Bug 1212190] New: Unable to 'docker login' with 1.6.0-0.1.rc6.fc21
by Red Hat Bugzilla 02 Dec '15

02 Dec '15

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1212190 Bug ID: 1212190 Summary: Unable to 'docker login' with 1.6.0-0.1.rc6.fc21 Product: Fedora Version: 21 Component: docker-io Keywords: Extras Assignee: ichavero(a)redhat.com Reporter: agoldste(a)redhat.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: adimania(a)gmail.com, admiller(a)redhat.com, dwalsh(a)redhat.com, golang(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, hushan.jia(a)gmail.com, ichavero(a)redhat.com, jchaloup(a)redhat.com, jperrin(a)centos.org, lsm5(a)redhat.com, lsu(a)redhat.com, mattdm(a)redhat.com, mgoldman(a)redhat.com, miminar(a)redhat.com, s(a)shk.io, thrcka(a)redhat.com, vbatts(a)redhat.com Depends On: 1212188 The same issue reported below exists in 1.6.0-0.1.rc6.fc21 +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #1212188 +++ Description of problem: I'm unable to 'docker login' using 1.6.0-2.el7 Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): docker-1.6.0-2.el7 How reproducible: 100% Steps to Reproduce: 1. docker login -u <user> -p <pass> -e <email> Actual results: FATA[0001] Post http:///var/run/docker.sock/v1.18/auth: EOF. Are you trying to connect to a TLS-enabled daemon without TLS? Expected results: WARNING: login credentials saved in /home/vagrant/.dockercfg. Login Succeeded Additional info: >From journalctl: time="2015-04-15T13:18:12-04:00" level=info msg="POST /v1.18/auth" time="2015-04-15T13:18:12-04:00" level=info msg="+job auth()" time="2015-04-15T13:18:12-04:00" level=info msg="-job auth()" 2015/04/15 13:18:12 http: panic serving @: runtime error: invalid memory address or nil pointer dereference goroutine 2838 [running]: net/http.funcÂ·011() /usr/lib/golang/src/net/http/server.go:1130 +0xbb fp=0xc20810d4c8 sp=0xc20810d3e8 runtime.call16(0xc20810def0, 0xc209c32510, 0x0) /usr/lib/golang/src/runtime/asm_amd64.s:401 +0x45 fp=0xc20810d4e0 sp=0xc20810d4c8 runtime.gopanic(0xb15060, 0xc20802a050) /usr/lib/golang/src/runtime/panic.go:387 +0x3a8 fp=0xc20810d548 sp=0xc20810d4e0 runtime.panicmem() /usr/lib/golang/src/runtime/panic.go:42 +0x4e fp=0xc20810d570 sp=0xc20810d548 runtime.sigpanic() /usr/lib/golang/src/runtime/sigpanic_unix.go:26 +0x274 fp=0xc20810d5c0 sp=0xc20810d570 github.com/docker/docker/registry.NewEndpoint(0x0, 0xc1e1d0, 0x0, 0x0) /builddir/build/BUILD/docker-b27feb4ff804f335c80861b17a4e2bfc29fbbf45/_build/src/github.com/docker/docker/registry/endpoint.go:47 +0x31 fp=0xc20810d620 sp=0xc20810d5c0 github.com/docker/docker/registry.(*Service).Auth(0xc20802e340, 0xc208d91900, 0x2) /builddir/build/BUILD/docker-b27feb4ff804f335c80861b17a4e2bfc29fbbf45/_build/src/github.com/docker/docker/registry/service.go:64 +0x168 fp=0xc20810d730 sp=0xc20810d620 github.com/docker/docker/registry.*Service.AuthÂ·fm(0xc208d91900, 0x7fac53e860a0) /builddir/build/BUILD/docker-b27feb4ff804f335c80861b17a4e2bfc29fbbf45/_build/src/github.com/docker/docker/registry/service.go:33 +0x31 fp=0xc20810d750 sp=0xc20810d730 github.com/docker/docker/engine.(*Job).Run(0xc208d91900, 0x0, 0x0) /builddir/build/BUILD/docker-b27feb4ff804f335c80861b17a4e2bfc29fbbf45/_build/src/github.com/docker/docker/engine/job.go:90 +0x936 fp=0xc20810d8a0 sp=0xc20810d750 github.com/docker/docker/api/server.postAuth(0xc2080e20d0, 0xc208984c27, 0x4, 0x7fac53ead348, 0xc208d917c0, 0xc20893e000, 0xc20933a6c0, 0x0, 0x0) /builddir/build/BUILD/docker-b27feb4ff804f335c80861b17a4e2bfc29fbbf45/_build/src/github.com/docker/docker/api/server/server.go:189 +0x292 fp=0xc20810d9e0 sp=0xc20810d8a0 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1212188 [Bug 1212188] Unable to 'docker login' with 1.6.0-2.el7 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 15

[Bug 1174354] New: Missing Requires: cadvisor
by Red Hat Bugzilla 02 Dec '15

02 Dec '15

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1174354 Bug ID: 1174354 Summary: Missing Requires: cadvisor Product: Fedora Version: 21 Component: kubernetes Assignee: jchaloup(a)redhat.com Reporter: tstclair(a)redhat.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: eparis(a)redhat.com, golang(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, jchaloup(a)redhat.com, lsm5(a)redhat.com, nhorman(a)redhat.com, vbatts(a)redhat.com Description of problem: k8's has a missing run-time dependency on cadvisor that is not installed when k8's is installed. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 0.6-4.0.git993ef88.fc21 How reproducible: 100% Steps to Reproduce: 1. yum install kubernetes 2. check installation list Actual results: no cadvisor Expected results: install cadvisor -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 7

← Newer
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
...
18
Older →

Jump to page:

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

golang July 2015