[Bug 1308656] New: docker-distribution should obsolete
docker-registry
by Red Hat Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1308656
Bug ID: 1308656
Summary: docker-distribution should obsolete docker-registry
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: docker-distribution
Assignee: lsm5(a)redhat.com
Reporter: lsm5(a)redhat.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: admiller(a)redhat.com, dwalsh(a)redhat.com,
extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org,
golang(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, jchaloup(a)redhat.com,
lsm5(a)redhat.com, marianne(a)tuxette.fr,
mgoldman(a)redhat.com, ttomecek(a)redhat.com
Depends On: 1305595
+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #1305595 +++
docker-distribution package has replaced it.
docker-distribution should have a obsoletes docker-registry and maybe a
provides docker-registry add to it.
Docker Inc will not longer be shipping any updates to the docker-registry
package.
--- Additional comment from Lokesh Mandvekar on 2016-02-08 10:37:38 CST ---
I'll retire this.
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305595
[Bug 1305595] The docker-registry package should be retired
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
7 years, 11 months
[Bug 1091538] New: golang crashing on ARMv7
by Red Hat Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1091538
Bug ID: 1091538
Summary: golang crashing on ARMv7
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: golang
Assignee: adam(a)spicenitz.org
Reporter: pbrobinson(a)gmail.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: adam(a)spicenitz.org, admiller(a)redhat.com,
golang(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, lemenkov(a)gmail.com,
lsm5(a)redhat.com, renich(a)woralelandia.com, s(a)shk.io,
vbatts(a)redhat.com
Blocks: 245418 (ARMTracker)
We're getting an crash with go when I try and enable go support for ARM in the
swig package.
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6780663
It's currently just a scratch build as I obviously can't push it if it fails.
checking Examples/go/callback
checking Examples/go/class
unexpected fault address 0x40440000
fatal error: fault
[signal 0xb code=0x1 addr=0x40440000 pc=0x40440000]
goroutine 1 [running]:
runtime.throw(0x15691f)
/usr/lib/golang/src/pkg/runtime/panic.c:464 +0x5c fp=0xb6ba5f7c
runtime: unexpected return pc for runtime.sigpanic called from 0x40440000
runtime.sigpanic()
/usr/lib/golang/src/pkg/runtime/os_linux.c:237 +0xa8 fp=0xb6ba5f88
goroutine 3 [syscall]:
runtime.goexit()
/usr/lib/golang/src/pkg/runtime/proc.c:1394
checking Examples/go/constants
make[3]: *** [go_run] Error 2
make[2]: *** [check] Error 2
make[1]: *** [class.actionexample] Error 2
checking Examples/go/enum
checking Examples/go/extend
checking Examples/go/funcptr
checking Examples/go/multimap
checking Examples/go/pointer
checking Examples/go/reference
checking Examples/go/simple
checking Examples/go/template
checking Examples/go/variables
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=245418
[Bug 245418] Tracker for ARM support
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
7 years, 11 months
[Bug 1211266] New: Tracking bugzilla for kubernetes updates
by Red Hat Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1211266
Bug ID: 1211266
Summary: Tracking bugzilla for kubernetes updates
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: kubernetes
Assignee: jchaloup(a)redhat.com
Reporter: jchaloup(a)redhat.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: eparis(a)redhat.com, golang(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
jchaloup(a)redhat.com, lsm5(a)redhat.com,
nhorman(a)redhat.com, vbatts(a)redhat.com
Tracker used for kubernetes updates.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
7 years, 11 months
[Bug 1306214] New: kubernetes for powerpc arches
by Red Hat Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1306214
Bug ID: 1306214
Summary: kubernetes for powerpc arches
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: kubernetes
Assignee: jchaloup(a)redhat.com
Reporter: menantea(a)linux.vnet.ibm.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: eparis(a)redhat.com, golang(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
jcajka(a)redhat.com, jchaloup(a)redhat.com,
nhorman(a)redhat.com, vbatts(a)redhat.com
It seems that kubernetes have been tested upstream for powerpc64le secondary
arch: https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/18417
Could you please update kubernetes version to have a chance to get it built on
secondary arches for f24 ?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
7 years, 11 months
[Bug 1265860] New: atomicapp-0.1.11 is available
by Red Hat Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1265860
Bug ID: 1265860
Summary: atomicapp-0.1.11 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: atomicapp
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee: vpavlin(a)redhat.com
Reporter: upstream-release-monitoring(a)fedoraproject.org
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: golang(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, jchaloup(a)redhat.com,
lmohanty(a)redhat.com, vpavlin(a)redhat.com
Latest upstream release: 0.1.11
Current version/release in rawhide: 0.1.10-1.fc24
URL: https://github.com/projectatomic/atomicapp
Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a
stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy
More information about the service that created this bug can be found at:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring
Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging
changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your
responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still
correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added
upstream.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
7 years, 11 months
[Bug 1265029] New: atomicapp-0.1.10 is available
by Red Hat Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1265029
Bug ID: 1265029
Summary: atomicapp-0.1.10 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: atomicapp
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee: vpavlin(a)redhat.com
Reporter: upstream-release-monitoring(a)fedoraproject.org
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: golang(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, jchaloup(a)redhat.com,
vpavlin(a)redhat.com
Latest upstream release: 0.1.10
Current version/release in rawhide: 0.1.3-2.fc24
URL: https://github.com/projectatomic/atomicapp
Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a
stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy
More information about the service that created this bug can be found at:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring
Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging
changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your
responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still
correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added
upstream.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
7 years, 11 months
[Bug 1292635] New: atomicapp-0.3.0 is available
by Red Hat Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1292635
Bug ID: 1292635
Summary: atomicapp-0.3.0 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: atomicapp
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee: vpavlin(a)redhat.com
Reporter: upstream-release-monitoring(a)fedoraproject.org
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: golang(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, jchaloup(a)redhat.com,
lmohanty(a)redhat.com, vpavlin(a)redhat.com
Latest upstream release: 0.3.0
Current version/release in rawhide: 0.2.3-1.fc24
URL: https://github.com/projectatomic/atomicapp
Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a
stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy
More information about the service that created this bug can be found at:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring
Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging
changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your
responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still
correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added
upstream.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
7 years, 11 months
[Bug 1250675] New: please build golang-googlecode-go-crypto for epel7
by Red Hat Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1250675
Bug ID: 1250675
Summary: please build golang-googlecode-go-crypto for epel7
Product: Fedora EPEL
Version: epel7
Component: golang-googlecode-go-crypto
Assignee: fpokorny(a)redhat.com
Reporter: carl.george(a)rackspace.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: fpokorny(a)redhat.com, golang(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
jchaloup(a)redhat.com, lsm5(a)redhat.com,
vbatts(a)redhat.com
Description of problem:
I would like to see asciinema in epel7. The latest version requires this go
package. Please build it for epel7.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
7 years, 11 months
[Bug 1200612] New: Package rocksdb binary for Fedora
by Red Hat Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1200612
Bug ID: 1200612
Summary: Package rocksdb binary for Fedora
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: golang-github-influxdb-rocksdb
Assignee: jchaloup(a)redhat.com
Reporter: ggillies(a)redhat.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: golang(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, jchaloup(a)redhat.com,
lsm5(a)redhat.com
Hi,
With influxdb version 0.9 moving to completely utilise rocksdb, we probably
want to look at expanding this package to fully provide a rocksdb compiled
binary.
That is, a rocksdb package that has /usr/bin/rocksdb, as well as the devel
package with the raw go code for deps (which this package currently provides)
Regards,
Graeme
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
7 years, 11 months
[Bug 1268206] New: golang-bin-1.5.1-0 file conflict with golang-vet-0.2.0
by Red Hat Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1268206
Bug ID: 1268206
Summary: golang-bin-1.5.1-0 file conflict with golang-vet-0.2.0
Product: Fedora
Version: 22
Component: golang
Assignee: vbatts(a)redhat.com
Reporter: maciek.borzecki(a)gmail.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: admiller(a)redhat.com, golang(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
jcajka(a)redhat.com, lemenkov(a)gmail.com,
renich(a)woralelandia.com, s(a)shk.io, vbatts(a)redhat.com
Description of problem:
When upgrading golang-bin from 1.4.2 to 1.5.1:
Running transaction check
Transaction check succeeded.
Running transaction test
The downloaded packages were saved in cache till the next successful
transaction.
You can remove cached packages by executing 'dnf clean packages'.
Error: Transaction check error:
file /usr/lib/golang/pkg/tool/linux_amd64/vet from install of
golang-bin-1.5.1-0.fc22.x86_64 conflicts with file from package
golang-vet-0-2.0.hga7e14835e46b.fc22.x86_64
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
How reproducible:
Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Have golang-bin-1.4.2-3 installed
2. Have golang-vet-0-2.0.hga7e14835e46b installed
3. Upgrade golang-bin to 1.5.1-0
Actual results:
File conflict between golang-bin-1.5.1 and golang-vet
Additional info:
golang-bin-1.5.1 should be replacing golang-vet
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
8 years