Go rpm macroses in rhel8 and epel
by Denis Fateyev
Hello all,
Originally posted to go-sig@, but haven't got any answer, maybe here will
be better luck.
I have recently tried to rebuild some Golang modules packages against
epel8, and found out that there were build issues at "%goprep".
Could anybody provide some more info: are Go rpm macroses not fully
backported to RHEL8 currently? Any kind of blockers, perhaps?
--
wbr, Denis.
2 years, 8 months
RPM error: following noarch package built differently on different
architectures
by Germano Massullo
Good day everybody. As some from #fedora-golang channel may know, Fabian
Affolter and I, we are releasing for the first time Bettercap to Fedora
repository. By the way we are getting this build error and we have no
idea about how to fix it
FAILED: BuildError: The following noarch package built differently on
different architectures:
golang-github-bettercap-devel-2.28-4.fc34.noarch.rpm
Since the problem seemed to be s390x architecture, we tried using
"ExcludeArch: s390x" but it did not work.
What should we do? If you want, feel free to use your proven packager
super powers to fix it
Thank you for your time
2 years, 8 months
[RFC] Should I retire or keep "dep"?
by Robert-André Mauchin
Hi,
dep is FTBFS, and I wonder if this is still useful to package it? It's not
maintained upstream and I think it has been obsoleted by Go modules.
Do we still have customers for it?
Please give me your opinions.
Best regards,
Robert-André
2 years, 9 months