[go-rpm-macros] PR #37: srpm/go.lua: fix handling of version numbers with multiple digits
jcajka commented on the pull-request: `srpm/go.lua: fix handling of version numbers with
multiple digits` that you are following:
``
I think this is wider issues that is caused by Go guidelines lagging behind the current
state of Go, especially use of the modules and the release/version tags there. I guess
the "v10" is actually correct if version/tag needs to be a part of the name of
the packages. It will be compat package(there is need to carry more version of the same
package in the distro) in a sense. IMHO general fix is to ignore [the versioning part of
the import path](https://golang.org/ref/mod#versions) in the go rpm macros magic and let
the version be defined by the rpm's version tag in spec. I'm aware that will most
probably will be rather bigger undertaking, I guess including the update of the packaging
guidelines.
@alexsaezm @ngompa @dbenoit What are your takes here?
``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/go-rpm-macros/pull-request/37