Re: Proposed Fedora packaging guideline: More Go packaging

[Jakub Cajka]

----- Original Message -----
> From: "Jason L Tibbitts III" 
> To: "nicolas mailhot" 
> Cc: [e-mail], "Development discussions related to Fedora" ,
> "Discussion of RPM packaging standards and practices for Fedora" 
> Sent: Tuesday, January 23, 2018 6:00:24 PM
> Subject: Re: Proposed Fedora packaging guideline: More Go packaging
>
> I wish this message wasn't crossposted everywhere, but I don't want to
> lose any discussion by trimming the CC list.  Sorry if replies generate
> bounces for some.
> > > > > > "nm" == nicolas mailhot  writes:
>
> nm> And the forge macros are now available since
> nm> redhat-rpm-config-73-1.fc28 (I had missed the push due to upstream
> nm> renaming the file). Heartfelt thanks to Jason Tibbitts !
>
> Please don't forget to let me know when it's time to start thinking
> about pushing this down to F27.  And maybe F26.  And as far as I can
> tell it should work with only minor modification in EPEL7 (via
> epel-rpm-macros).  I don't know about EPEL6, but we really should look
> at it given some of the other discussions about specfile compatibility.
> Some packagers wouldn't ever use it if it doesn't work everywhere.

I think that it would be great to land it also in the EPEL6/7.

JC
> Finally, we should also talk about whether there is any integration or
> automation possible between fedpkg and specfiles configured with these
> macros.
> J<
>
> devel mailing list -- [e-mail]
> To unsubscribe send an email to [e-mail]