Re: [Fedora-legal-list] License of Go/Rust or any statically linked packages

[Igor Raits]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

On Fri, 2020-06-26 at 13:33 +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> Looking for example at git-lfs:
>
> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/git-lfs/blob/master/f/git-lfs.spec
>
> I am afraid that the license field is wrong. Since the Go packages
> are
> statically linked, that means also content of all the BR is part of
> the
> binary packages and therefore should include their licenses. This
> also
> applies to Rust and all other statically linked packages.

I think we already do it fine for Rust, no?

https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rust-ripgrep/blob/master/f/rust-ripgrep.s...
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rust-bat/blob/master/f/rust-bat.spec#_35
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rust-starship/blob/master/f/rust-starship...

and so on.
> I believe the guidelines should be amended to handle this scenario
> and
> all the packages fixed appropriately.

We've also discussed this here:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rust-rpick/pull-request/1
> Thoughts?

I think Pull Request is very welcomed in the packaging guidelines.
> Vít
>
> legal mailing list -- [e-mail]
> To unsubscribe send an email to [e-mail]
> Fedora Code of Conduct:   
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines:   
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:   
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[e-mail]

- -- 
Igor Raits
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
> iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEEcwgJ58gsbV5f5dMcEV1auJxcHh4FAl714H4ACgkQEV1auJxc
> Hh78ow//YSYs1uSZul0G4FZY5arc/Rxhsdsne5ENo8rFoltrebwfwHBxjOmfaD+9
> elPQcPb5P0kYljTt3c3+3m0nvpZPVFFycE+ZlHG+cFgQCSwQ8MBR0ggIJPFtPz6G
> 4HC5VBT7m8bmw/EFk5Gx9D+OZ+NYAlIxIMOQXSnUoZCZAe+YdIohhvVGXh3p+Czj
> WxYmFMqG9ECP6joXEiZE4O4pdA1S0wRL3w1AVMZTyqQSwIPqTOWuIcsb8xj6Dg++
> EfR56Z1L8vnbgajH/F6RzJow4CQJt7qaCnl/ncPUFw194W9gyij75HvtudfJLerb
> JoLXCqqa+kTC18RDjEaJTXFPbrticEMSGaHIWDV+KQU4kWAPlM00Qq2ikVPn01AM
> 23G1T40c8WO/H+jiUtRxBIebaC16BGGf8uMavLocCm0PtvzDExXbNKXsgiKZB9N5
> nl1DmeDHtoUpUUFkOCh6lbYfSZaz2no9W+wGgXMTwGYcpq2UYg0G3dY4gWwy1o+v
> AZbpgoSCyPobqmd54qRWKH7XGXbvTla4qWggL/VMU/jzxPRtnfnMkHmSULA57M36
> zDYs8ff6pUorM1qv/3MJ5BruN0y/QOwMq6dXdKItNm7mAEJ+95S+elh7SFOpQx69
> VnwYfBlWX6Fn93Ti1F7MEcouh9HXN+T1YBWpYBniInqLOny7n4s=
> =QPwA
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

[Fedora-legal-list] License of Go/Rust or any statically linked packages

[Igor Raits]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

On Fri, 2020-06-26 at 13:48 +0200, Igor Raits wrote:
> On Fri, 2020-06-26 at 13:33 +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> > Looking for example at git-lfs:
> >
> > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/git-lfs/blob/master/f/git-lfs.spec
> >
> > I am afraid that the license field is wrong. Since the Go packages
> > are
> > statically linked, that means also content of all the BR is part of
> > the
> > binary packages and therefore should include their licenses. This
> > also
> > applies to Rust and all other statically linked packages.
>
> I think we already do it fine for Rust, no?
>
> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rust-ripgrep/blob/master/f/rust-ripgrep.s...
> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rust-bat/blob/master/f/rust-bat.spec#_35
> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rust-starship/blob/master/f/rust-starship...
>
> and so on.

Forgot to mention that we even have script to generate those:
https://pagure.io/fedora-rust/rust2rpm/blob/master/f/tools/fedora-helper.py
> > I believe the guidelines should be amended to handle this scenario
> > and
> > all the packages fixed appropriately.
>
> We've also discussed this here:
> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rust-rpick/pull-request/1
> > Thoughts?
>
> I think Pull Request is very welcomed in the packaging guidelines.
> > Vít
> >
> > legal mailing list -- [e-mail]
> > To unsubscribe send an email to [e-mail]
> > Fedora Code of Conduct:   
> > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> > List Guidelines:   
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> > List Archives:   
> > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[e-mail]

- -- 
Igor Raits
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
> iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEEcwgJ58gsbV5f5dMcEV1auJxcHh4FAl714egACgkQEV1auJxc
> Hh6lBQ//UTR0h1YecxlcCLV52LdDYLtCb1YFB1GsSJgg5B7Veq8ACRqNy9QqbWxL
> mtluCHJpCM7dpdH5L4+xzKREI6eJHTSCQIRKopcA4bPy97g/0sRQ8+4xLGKJbh7l
> AEa9VAlkYHyqCDbmc2T+QEwXru7kXTNio14eNxIpwn3mOZpab9SYMlu7H6sHKPy6
> oWJF0HIROFW5vNwwsB6UW7IV044IJ72zYG2LN2tjNGsTFvqR5LTfaJImPPP4vWJT
> 8YJfcFCFdQXnwunj5Y1DJwgSLNBem31MOhS+Vq6E3nXjsTflNVEt4/UPB5HRrJcl
> vYoeaVHcE1Gbn2FUWvXTe9TRdujBpVVT4rgvxPh+cKh9x5FrS4Eg1Jj+WrIgszYn
> NWIrJW0e2iwZZN9P7ZTuefbdjKhKyDvqIghNKt16gcfzQ6L/yYfiKURKBOYiRtmA
> Q+KStJRogH6kwWMWlPlNpRpDr9rCpC5j+F+Jg9IfXFUP10DswN8zXwPsab39nSeA
> e51Ko5YqRPapSCe6gSWYbI1g4ngz4vwxpPw36UTOEiDuHR3BNKZvNeTNB/lzDuoh
> 6DIIXyWfeUmsuhSN6igc6j+CpQtnWtU94ESM6BbfjAnJgNahrY4pPkUQ3XzGU9yR
> ewl/fjyQAIkMNWV3RwMp5aCIypFNJDgRT0RQ9eFmYBqeOGs6/nY=
> =3AC1
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----